From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Joaquin de Andres" <me@xcancerberox.com.ar>,
"Alistair Francis" <alistair@alistair23.me>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Andrew Baumann" <Andrew.Baumann@microsoft.com>,
"Esteban Bosse" <estebanbosse@gmail.com>,
"Niek Linnenbank" <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] hw/arm/raspi: Make board_rev a field of RaspiMachineClass
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 10:50:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200210105042.7e76e4e6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200208165645.15657-9-f4bug@amsat.org>
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 17:56:40 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
> We want to have a common class_init(). The only value that
> matters (and changes) is the board revision.
> Pass the board_rev as class_data to class_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> hw/arm/raspi.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/raspi.c b/hw/arm/raspi.c
> index 62b8df3c2e..fbfcd29732 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/raspi.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/raspi.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ typedef struct RaspiMachineClass {
> /*< private >*/
> MachineClass parent_obj;
> /*< public >*/
> + uint32_t board_rev;
> } RaspiMachineClass;
>
> #define TYPE_RASPI_MACHINE MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("raspi-common")
> @@ -227,9 +228,11 @@ static void setup_boot(MachineState *machine, int version, size_t ram_size)
> arm_load_kernel(ARM_CPU(first_cpu), machine, &binfo);
> }
>
> -static void raspi_init(MachineState *machine, uint32_t board_rev)
> +static void raspi_init(MachineState *machine)
> {
> + RaspiMachineClass *mc = RASPI_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> RaspiMachineState *s = RASPI_MACHINE(machine);
> + uint32_t board_rev = mc->board_rev;
> int version = board_version(board_rev);
> uint64_t ram_size = board_ram_size(board_rev);
> uint32_t vcram_size;
> @@ -279,13 +282,16 @@ static void raspi_init(MachineState *machine, uint32_t board_rev)
>
> static void raspi2_init(MachineState *machine)
> {
> - raspi_init(machine, 0xa21041);
> + raspi_init(machine);
> }
>
> static void raspi2_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> {
> MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
> + RaspiMachineClass *rmc = RASPI_MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
> + uint32_t board_rev = (uint32_t)(uintptr_t)data;
>
> + rmc->board_rev = board_rev;
instead of doing a bit obscure ".class_data = (void *)0xa21041," and
using it here, I'd just do
rmc->board_rev = 0xa21041;
using value specific for each leaf class
with this change
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> mc->desc = "Raspberry Pi 2B";
> mc->init = raspi2_init;
> mc->block_default_type = IF_SD;
> @@ -302,13 +308,16 @@ static void raspi2_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> #ifdef TARGET_AARCH64
> static void raspi3_init(MachineState *machine)
> {
> - raspi_init(machine, 0xa02082);
> + raspi_init(machine);
> }
>
> static void raspi3_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> {
> MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
> + RaspiMachineClass *rmc = RASPI_MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
> + uint32_t board_rev = (uint32_t)(uintptr_t)data;
>
> + rmc->board_rev = board_rev;
> mc->desc = "Raspberry Pi 3B";
> mc->init = raspi3_init;
> mc->block_default_type = IF_SD;
> @@ -327,11 +336,13 @@ static const TypeInfo raspi_machine_types[] = {
> .name = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("raspi2"),
> .parent = TYPE_RASPI_MACHINE,
> .class_init = raspi2_machine_class_init,
> + .class_data = (void *)0xa21041,
> #ifdef TARGET_AARCH64
> }, {
> .name = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("raspi3"),
> .parent = TYPE_RASPI_MACHINE,
> .class_init = raspi3_machine_class_init,
> + .class_data = (void *)0xa02082,
> #endif
> }, {
> .name = TYPE_RASPI_MACHINE,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-10 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-08 16:56 [PATCH v3 00/13] hw/arm/raspi: Dynamically create machines based on the board revision Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] hw/arm/raspi: Use BCM2708 machine type with pre Device Tree kernels Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-09 22:53 ` Niek Linnenbank
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] hw/arm/raspi: Correct the board descriptions Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-09 22:51 ` Niek Linnenbank
2020-02-09 23:02 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] hw/arm/raspi: Extract the version from the board revision Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-13 13:40 ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-13 13:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] hw/arm/raspi: Extract the RAM size " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] hw/arm/raspi: Extract the processor type " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] hw/arm/raspi: Trivial code movement Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-10 9:58 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] hw/arm/raspi: Make machines children of abstract RaspiMachineClass Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-10 9:45 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] hw/arm/raspi: Make board_rev a field of RaspiMachineClass Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-10 9:50 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2020-02-10 10:03 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-10 13:09 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] hw/arm/raspi: Let class_init() directly call raspi_machine_init() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-10 9:55 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] hw/arm/raspi: Set default RAM size to size encoded in board revision Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] hw/arm/raspi: Extract the board model from the " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] hw/arm/raspi: Use a unique raspi_machine_class_init() method Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-10 10:01 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-13 13:59 ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-13 14:15 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-13 14:32 ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-13 15:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-15 17:45 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-08 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] hw/arm/raspi: Extract the cores count from the board revision Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-10 10:03 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-13 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] hw/arm/raspi: Dynamically create machines based on " Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200210105042.7e76e4e6@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=Andrew.Baumann@microsoft.com \
--cc=alistair@alistair23.me \
--cc=estebanbosse@gmail.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=me@xcancerberox.com.ar \
--cc=nieklinnenbank@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).