From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CCDC35254 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 19:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BF4F20661 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 19:34:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0BF4F20661 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:37814 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j1Eoz-0007Xm-1B for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:34:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52517) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j1Eo6-00077w-GD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:33:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1Eo4-0005WK-IR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:33:21 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:26962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1Eo4-0005RK-99 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:33:20 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01AJWhTn103084 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:33:15 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2y1u5693x8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:33:15 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 19:33:12 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 10 Feb 2020 19:33:09 -0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 01AJX8ib25428200 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 19:33:08 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FBAAE051; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 19:33:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A114DAE053; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 19:33:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc2783563651 (unknown [9.152.224.20]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 19:33:08 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:33:06 +0100 From: Halil Pasic To: Igor Mammedov Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 38/80] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: use memdev for RAM In-Reply-To: <20200206141553.706bc17b@redhat.com> References: <1580483390-131164-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <1580483390-131164-39-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20200205211123.43914b0c.pasic@linux.ibm.com> <20200206141553.706bc17b@redhat.com> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20021019-0008-0000-0000-000003519CE8 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20021019-0009-0000-0000-00004A723BCC Message-Id: <20200210203306.44a6696a.pasic@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-10_07:2020-02-10, 2020-02-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=876 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002100144 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 148.163.156.1 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:15:53 +0100 Igor Mammedov wrote: > > Tested-by: Halil Pasic > > Acked-by: Halil Pasic > Thanks, > > Could you also take a look at patches 3-7/8o that makes this possible? > (it never hurts to have second pair of eyes on a code that affects > everyone). Sorry, I'm in the middle of debugging something, and it does not look like I will be able to do a proper review on this soon. I did a quick scan through the code and I did not see anything fishy. Regards, Halil