From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAAAC35242 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 19:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76E820708 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 19:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="h5krVA33" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D76E820708 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=roeck-us.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56402 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j1bJP-0008Mg-1j for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:35:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46348) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j1bHh-0007SC-Fn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:33:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1bHg-0008HU-7m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:33:25 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x641.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::641]:40638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1bHg-0008AP-0F; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:33:24 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-x641.google.com with SMTP id y1so4668328plp.7; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:33:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=aWltyIygR++XQS2oU6s22u496QY3iyGDI8+SIrPN/Hk=; b=h5krVA33bDfDvq6NC/JdJUgDRcr487HpZfEyN9ddRmqHVdtIm8LwNQGyvqweFR8O4t JSc3aLCK1Y6jXyUHqUYt9VJT6JogWXiAGxQnZjfr7kRoJfkscBUR8AGStfo13CTPFv86 G6KHD/iHaj1ttmv0M2RYh/UaRoZqBfj0XAURm820F8CVh+tZaPJPtg9m4scSLPWoKEpg Lg5mlHLsf34aNDbJtNqwQjdf2XOvX2tPQjjouywvJCB6O5xvtL4M2DYphAKM87XkbuwM X71Vf7no2Tiq1HXzv2EM++RB7Spw58ozE2CI/V42etPTl4rTngXuU6PbucnXgX/KoSqw zgiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=aWltyIygR++XQS2oU6s22u496QY3iyGDI8+SIrPN/Hk=; b=Vxvs9Q8diACGPzR+j3wRAmm/gfFkNHxKJXjwBw8MBwj1cbgk0rjIBtaFSeW/1/xrlP INXdW+tbH+RVxs6fKf+PCz69bg5o/f6SIud7+ZytzHpjdqwwvy5bgD1ai3QyQYdzzxqu EYAkai1n9RDuj+pjSgQ6nFI5m5C6t3O4NNAEZ59OknJqxrp13Uf1suplH/xWVSU55Stu FHYGNBJnZWk6sTXmyZaPPUbINcGB6qYVnT2BwmLoWILCihdCpAnAi5v1dCOPme2/ioy8 XQUj9TwicL4Js4tyTZ2ub+i+9DvHuOde8XC3IqaSqlJe4WUQ8w10yyCIUP/2bTyolw2v g4Yg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWmDN+LGkxokqmTdF2jY20rLypTtEQnhLJfurmVwzYX4iM9zj54 rjEwGXg508ns21GAWjbG7xU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzXm9c0gAT6ZeNFhgFrvBIRb0HLSHPqWYGcWLlX3ddfz3Xh2aQPkOgxteFyZujpzP7HpD0UOQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9416:: with SMTP id r22mr5519868pjo.2.1581449601037; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:33:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q21sm5034212pff.105.2020.02.11.11.33.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:33:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:33:18 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hw/arm: ast2600: Wire up EHCI controllers Message-ID: <20200211193318.GA11891@roeck-us.net> References: <20200207174548.9087-1-linux@roeck-us.net> <158111304888.591.9861885311267533100@a1bbccc8075a> <20200207224850.GA10890@roeck-us.net> <445cee18-5de3-3da4-fef4-2e3f4530d96b@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::641 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Andrew Jeffery , QEMU Developers , qemu-arm , Joel Stanley , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 07:13:48PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 08:12, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > > > On 2/7/20 11:48 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 02:04:09PM -0800, no-reply@patchew.org wrote: > > >> Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200207174548.9087-1-linux@roeck-us.net/ > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> This series failed the docker-mingw@fedora build test. Please find the testing commands and > > >> their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it > > >> locally. > > >> > > > I forgot to mention that the patch depends on the similar > > > patch for ast2400/ast2500. Sorry for that. Not sure though how > > > to tell that to the test build system. > > > > You mean the "Aspeed: machine extensions and fixes" series? > > Seems unlikely given that series is from 2019 and went into > master last year... Probably Guenter means > "ast2400/ast2500: Wire up EHCI controllers" > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200206183437.3979-1-linux@roeck-us.net/ > > (which I had dropped from my to-review queue because I'd > misunderstood Cedric's review and was expecting to see > a v2 of that which covered all of ast2400/2500/2600 -- > I'll put it back on my list to queue before this one) > Yes, that is correct; the patch for ast2600 depends on the patch for ast2400/ast2500. Please let me know if I need to resend both. Thanks, Guenter