From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] spapr: Migrate SpaprDrc::unplug_requested
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:48:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200214124847.25ecfb9e@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200214022900.GK124369@umbus.fritz.box>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4376 bytes --]
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:29:00 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 11:36:22PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Hot unplugging a device is an asynchronous operation. If the guest is
> > migrated after the event was sent but before it could release the
> > device with RTAS, the destination QEMU doesn't know about the pending
> > unplug operation and doesn't actually remove the device when the guest
> > finally releases it. The device
> >
> > Migrate SpaprDrc::unplug_requested to fix the inconsistency. This is
> > done with a subsection that is only sent if an unplug request is
> > pending. This allows to preserve migration with older guests in the
> > case of a pending hotplug request. This will cause migration to fail
> > if the destination can't handle the subsection, but this is better
> > than ending with an inconsistency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> > ---
> > hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c
> > index d512ac6e1e7f..6f5cab70fc6b 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c
> > @@ -455,6 +455,22 @@ void spapr_drc_reset(SpaprDrc *drc)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static bool spapr_drc_unplug_requested_needed(void *opaque)
> > +{
> > + return spapr_drc_unplug_requested(opaque);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_drc_unplug_requested = {
> > + .name = "spapr_drc/unplug_requested",
> > + .version_id = 1,
> > + .minimum_version_id = 1,
> > + .needed = spapr_drc_unplug_requested_needed,
> > + .fields = (VMStateField []) {
> > + VMSTATE_BOOL(unplug_requested, SpaprDrc),
> > + VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> > + }
> > +};
> > +
> > static bool spapr_drc_needed(void *opaque)
> > {
> > SpaprDrc *drc = (SpaprDrc *)opaque;
> > @@ -467,8 +483,11 @@ static bool spapr_drc_needed(void *opaque)
> > /*
> > * We need to migrate the state if it's not equal to the expected
> > * long-term state, which is the same as the coldplugged initial
> > - * state */
> > - return !spapr_drc_device_ready(drc);
> > + * state, or if an unplug request is pending.
> > + */
> > + return
> > + spapr_drc_unplug_requested_needed(drc) ||
> > + !spapr_drc_device_ready(drc);
>
> Hrm. You start the series by splitting spapr_drc_device_ready() from
> spapr_drc_needed(). But at this point, I'm pretty sure you've now got
> all the callers of spapr_drc_device_ready() doing equivalent logic
> about them, so they might as well be one function again. That seems
> pretty roundabout.
>
Yeah... I did the split because an earlier draft of this series had
a separate path at some point for the plug and unplug cases... but
I agree these should be reunited.
> I don't think the rationale for not using the drc_ready function from
> the CAS path really makes sense. It's not just an accident that those
> use the same logic - in both cases what we're testing is "Is the DRC
> in a state other than that of a default cold-plugged device?".
>
"Is the DRC in a state other than that of a default cold-plugged device
or is an unplug request pending ?" since the DRC of the device to be
unplugged only transitions away from the "ready state" when the guest
asks to isolate the device with the "set-indicator" RTAS call.
> Changing the name might be sensible, but I still think we want a
> common function for the two cases.
>
I'll go for that. Maybe reverse the semantics, like if "the DRC has
no attached device or it has an attached device without pending unplug
request" then it is in a steady state that doesn't require anything
special at CAS or migration time, eg. spapr_drc_steady() ?
> > }
> >
> > static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_drc = {
> > @@ -479,6 +498,10 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_drc = {
> > .fields = (VMStateField []) {
> > VMSTATE_UINT32(state, SpaprDrc),
> > VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> > + },
> > + .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * []) {
> > + &vmstate_spapr_drc_unplug_requested,
> > + NULL
> > }
> > };
> >
> >
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-14 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 22:36 [PATCH 0/3] spapr: Fix device unplug vs CAS or migration Greg Kurz
2020-02-03 22:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] spapr: Don't use spapr_drc_needed() in CAS code Greg Kurz
2020-02-03 22:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] spapr: Detect hot unplugged devices during CAS Greg Kurz
2020-02-03 22:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] spapr: Migrate SpaprDrc::unplug_requested Greg Kurz
2020-02-14 2:29 ` David Gibson
2020-02-14 11:48 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2020-02-13 15:10 ` [PATCH 0/3] spapr: Fix device unplug vs CAS or migration Greg Kurz
2020-02-14 2:29 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200214124847.25ecfb9e@bahia.lan \
--to=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).