From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/16] hw/i386: Update structures for nodes_per_pkg
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:34:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200224093439.5fda5656@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158161782489.48948.9328710425201785950.stgit@naples-babu.amd.com>
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:17:04 -0600
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com> wrote:
> Update structures X86CPUTopoIDs and CPUX86State to hold the nodes_per_pkg.
> This is required to build EPYC mode topology.
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/pc.c | 1 +
> hw/i386/x86.c | 2 ++
> include/hw/i386/topology.h | 2 ++
> include/hw/i386/x86.h | 1 +
> target/i386/cpu.c | 1 +
> target/i386/cpu.h | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index f13721ac43..02fdb3d506 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -1753,6 +1753,7 @@ static void pc_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> init_topo_info(&topo_info, x86ms);
>
> env->nr_dies = x86ms->smp_dies;
> + env->nr_nodes = ms->numa_state->num_nodes / ms->smp.sockets;
it would be better if calculation would result in valid result
so you won't have to later scatter MAX(env->nr_nodes, 1) everywhere.
also I'd use earlier intialized:
env->nr_nodes = topo_info->nodes_per_pkg
to avoid repeating calculation
> /*
> * If APIC ID is not set,
> diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c
> index 083effb2f5..3d944f68e6 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/x86.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c
> @@ -89,11 +89,13 @@ void x86_cpu_new(X86MachineState *x86ms, int64_t apic_id, Error **errp)
> Object *cpu = NULL;
> Error *local_err = NULL;
> CPUX86State *env = NULL;
> + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(x86ms);
>
> cpu = object_new(MACHINE(x86ms)->cpu_type);
>
> env = &X86_CPU(cpu)->env;
> env->nr_dies = x86ms->smp_dies;
> + env->nr_nodes = ms->numa_state->num_nodes / ms->smp.sockets;
Is this really necessary? (I think pc_cpu_pre_plug should take care of setting it)
> object_property_set_uint(cpu, apic_id, "apic-id", &local_err);
> object_property_set_bool(cpu, true, "realized", &local_err);
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/topology.h b/include/hw/i386/topology.h
> index ef0ab0b6a3..522c77e6a9 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/topology.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/topology.h
> @@ -41,12 +41,14 @@
>
> #include "qemu/bitops.h"
> #include "hw/i386/x86.h"
> +#include "sysemu/numa.h"
>
> static inline void init_topo_info(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info,
> const X86MachineState *x86ms)
> {
> MachineState *ms = MACHINE(x86ms);
>
> + topo_info->nodes_per_pkg = ms->numa_state->num_nodes / ms->smp.sockets;
> topo_info->dies_per_pkg = x86ms->smp_dies;
> topo_info->cores_per_die = ms->smp.cores;
> topo_info->threads_per_core = ms->smp.threads;
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/x86.h b/include/hw/i386/x86.h
> index ad62b01cf2..d76fd0bbb1 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/x86.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/x86.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ typedef struct X86CPUTopoIDs {
> } X86CPUTopoIDs;
>
> typedef struct X86CPUTopoInfo {
> + unsigned nodes_per_pkg;
> unsigned dies_per_pkg;
> unsigned cores_per_die;
> unsigned threads_per_core;
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index 7e630f47ac..5d6edfd09b 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -6761,6 +6761,7 @@ static void x86_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
> FeatureWord w;
>
> env->nr_dies = 1;
> + env->nr_nodes = 1;
> cpu_set_cpustate_pointers(cpu);
>
> object_property_add(obj, "family", "int",
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
> index af282936a7..627a8cb9be 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
> @@ -1603,6 +1603,7 @@ typedef struct CPUX86State {
> TPRAccess tpr_access_type;
>
> unsigned nr_dies;
> + unsigned nr_nodes;
> } CPUX86State;
>
> struct kvm_msrs;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-24 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-13 18:16 [PATCH v4 00/16] APIC ID fixes for AMD EPYC CPU model Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] hw/i386: Rename X86CPUTopoInfo structure to X86CPUTopoIDs Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] hw/i386: Introduce X86CPUTopoInfo to contain topology info Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] hw/i386: Consolidate topology functions Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] hw/i386: Introduce init_topo_info to initialize X86CPUTopoInfo Babu Moger
2020-02-21 17:05 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-21 17:51 ` Babu Moger
2020-02-24 8:18 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-24 16:54 ` Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] machine: Add SMP Sockets in CpuTopology Babu Moger
2020-02-24 8:37 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] hw/i386: Update structures for nodes_per_pkg Babu Moger
2020-02-24 8:34 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2020-02-24 17:12 ` Babu Moger
2020-02-25 7:42 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] hw/i386: Rename apicid_from_topo_ids to x86_apicid_from_topo_ids Babu Moger
2020-02-20 12:43 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] hw/386: Add EPYC mode topology decoding functions Babu Moger
2020-02-24 8:50 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-24 17:24 ` Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] target/i386: Cleanup and use the EPYC mode topology functions Babu Moger
2020-02-24 8:52 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-24 17:29 ` Babu Moger
2020-02-25 7:49 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-25 15:10 ` Babu Moger
2020-03-02 17:09 ` Babu Moger
2020-03-03 8:47 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] hw/i386: Introduce apicid functions inside X86MachineState Babu Moger
2020-02-24 17:01 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-24 17:30 ` Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] target/i386: Load apicid model specific handlers from X86CPUDefinition Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] hw/i386: Use the apicid handlers from X86MachineState Babu Moger
2020-02-24 17:19 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-24 17:58 ` Babu Moger
2020-02-24 22:31 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-02-24 23:13 ` Babu Moger
2020-02-25 15:32 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-02-25 15:41 ` Babu Moger
2020-02-25 8:16 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-25 15:26 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] target/i386: Add EPYC model specific handlers Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:17 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] hw/i386: Move arch_id decode inside x86_cpus_init Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] i386: Fix pkg_id offset for EPYC cpu models Babu Moger
2020-02-13 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] tests: Update the Unit tests Babu Moger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200224093439.5fda5656@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).