From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/17] target/arm: Add isar_feature_aa64_fp_simd, isar_feature_aa32_vfp
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:22:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200224222232.13807-5-richard.henderson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224222232.13807-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
We cannot easily create "any" functions for these, because the
ID_AA64PFR0 fields for FP and SIMD signal "enabled" with zero.
Which means that an aarch32-only cpu will return incorrect results
when testing the aarch64 registers.
To use these, we must either have context or additionally test
vs ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/cpu.h | 11 +++++++++++
target/arm/cpu.c | 9 ++++++---
target/arm/machine.c | 5 +++--
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index f7a90f512e..b94d2a5ace 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -3494,6 +3494,11 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa32_fpdp_v3(const ARMISARegisters *id)
return FIELD_EX32(id->mvfr0, MVFR0, FPDP) >= 2;
}
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa32_vfp(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ return isar_feature_aa32_fpsp_v2(id) || isar_feature_aa32_fpdp_v2(id);
+}
+
/*
* We always set the FP and SIMD FP16 fields to indicate identical
* levels of support (assuming SIMD is implemented at all), so
@@ -3696,6 +3701,12 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_dcpodp(const ARMISARegisters *id)
return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64isar1, ID_AA64ISAR1, DPB) >= 2;
}
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_fp_simd(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ /* We always set the AdvSIMD and FP fields identically. */
+ return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64pfr0, ID_AA64PFR0, FP) != 0xf;
+}
+
static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_fp16(const ARMISARegisters *id)
{
/* We always set the AdvSIMD and FP fields identically wrt FP16. */
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index be4c2a1253..5be4c25809 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -1260,7 +1260,9 @@ void arm_cpu_post_init(Object *obj)
* KVM does not currently allow us to lie to the guest about its
* ID/feature registers, so the guest always sees what the host has.
*/
- if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_VFP)) {
+ if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)
+ ? cpu_isar_feature(aa64_fp_simd, cpu)
+ : cpu_isar_feature(aa32_vfp, cpu)) {
cpu->has_vfp = true;
if (!kvm_enabled()) {
qdev_property_add_static(DEVICE(obj), &arm_cpu_has_vfp_property);
@@ -1636,8 +1638,9 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
* We rely on no XScale CPU having VFP so we can use the same bits in the
* TB flags field for VECSTRIDE and XSCALE_CPAR.
*/
- assert(!(arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_VFP) &&
- arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_XSCALE)));
+ assert(arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64) ||
+ !cpu_isar_feature(aa32_vfp_simd, cpu) ||
+ !arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_XSCALE));
if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V7) &&
!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M) &&
diff --git a/target/arm/machine.c b/target/arm/machine.c
index 241890ac8c..c5a2114f51 100644
--- a/target/arm/machine.c
+++ b/target/arm/machine.c
@@ -9,9 +9,10 @@
static bool vfp_needed(void *opaque)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = opaque;
- CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
- return arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_VFP);
+ return (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)
+ ? cpu_isar_feature(aa64_fp_simd, cpu)
+ : cpu_isar_feature(aa32_vfp_simd, cpu));
}
static int get_fpscr(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, size_t size,
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-24 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 22:22 [PATCH v2 00/17] target/arm: vfp feature and decodetree cleanup Richard Henderson
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] target/arm: Add isar_feature_aa32_vfp_simd Richard Henderson
2020-02-25 13:18 ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] target/arm: Rename isar_feature_aa32_fpdp_v2 Richard Henderson
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] target/arm: Add isar_feature_aa32_{fpsp_v2, fpsp_v3, fpdp_v3} Richard Henderson
2020-02-24 22:22 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2020-02-25 13:20 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] target/arm: Add isar_feature_aa64_fp_simd, isar_feature_aa32_vfp Peter Maydell
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] target/arm: Improve ID_AA64PFR0 FP/SIMD validation Richard Henderson
2020-02-25 13:24 ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-25 15:55 ` Richard Henderson
2020-02-25 15:58 ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-25 16:00 ` Richard Henderson
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] target/arm: Perform fpdp_v2 check first Richard Henderson
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] target/arm: Replace ARM_FEATURE_VFP3 checks with fp{sp, dp}_v3 Richard Henderson
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] target/arm: Add missing checks for fpsp_v2 Richard Henderson
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] target/arm: Replace ARM_FEATURE_VFP4 with isar_feature_aa32_simdfmac Richard Henderson
2020-02-25 13:25 ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] target/arm: Remove ARM_FEATURE_VFP check from disas_vfp_insn Richard Henderson
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] target/arm: Move VLLDM and VLSTM to vfp.decode Richard Henderson
2020-02-25 13:26 ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] target/arm: Move the vfp decodetree calls next to the base isa Richard Henderson
2020-02-25 13:29 ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] linux-user/arm: Replace ARM_FEATURE_VFP* tests for HWCAP Richard Henderson
2020-02-25 13:30 ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] target/arm: Remove ARM_FEATURE_VFP* Richard Henderson
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] target/arm: Add formats for some vfp 2 and 3-register insns Richard Henderson
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] target/arm: Split VFM decode Richard Henderson
2020-02-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] target/arm: Split VMINMAXNM decode Richard Henderson
2020-02-25 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/17] target/arm: vfp feature and decodetree cleanup Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200224222232.13807-5-richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).