From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: lvivier@redhat.com, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
aik@ozlabs.ru, farosas@linux.ibm.com,
Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, clg@kaod.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/18] target/ppc: Introduce ppc_hash64_use_vrma() helper
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:30:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200225113044.06fb16b7@bahia.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224233724.46415-6-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:37:11 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> When running guests under a hypervisor, the hypervisor obviously needs to
> be protected from guest accesses even if those are in what the guest
> considers real mode (translation off). The POWER hardware provides two
> ways of doing that: The old way has guest real mode accesses simply offset
> and bounds checked into host addresses. It works, but requires that a
> significant chunk of the guest's memory - the RMA - be physically
> contiguous in the host, which is pretty inconvenient. The new way, known
> as VRMA, has guest real mode accesses translated in roughly the normal way
> but with some special parameters.
>
> In POWER7 and POWER8 the LPCR[VPM0] bit selected between the two modes, but
> in POWER9 only VRMA mode is supported and LPCR[VPM0] no longer exists. We
> handle that difference in behaviour in ppc_hash64_set_isi().. but not in
> other places that we blindly check LPCR[VPM0].
>
> Correct those instances with a new helper to tell if we should be in VRMA
> mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> index 392f90e0ae..e372c42add 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> @@ -668,6 +668,21 @@ unsigned ppc_hash64_hpte_page_shift_noslb(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool ppc_hash64_use_vrma(CPUPPCState *env)
> +{
> + switch (env->mmu_model) {
> + case POWERPC_MMU_3_00:
> + /*
> + * ISAv3.0 (POWER9) always uses VRMA, the VPM0 field and RMOR
> + * register no longer exist
> + */
> + return true;
> +
> + default:
> + return !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void ppc_hash64_set_isi(CPUState *cs, uint64_t error_code)
> {
> CPUPPCState *env = &POWERPC_CPU(cs)->env;
> @@ -676,15 +691,7 @@ static void ppc_hash64_set_isi(CPUState *cs, uint64_t error_code)
> if (msr_ir) {
> vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM1);
> } else {
> - switch (env->mmu_model) {
> - case POWERPC_MMU_3_00:
> - /* Field deprecated in ISAv3.00 - interrupts always go to hyperv */
> - vpm = true;
> - break;
> - default:
> - vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0);
> - break;
> - }
> + vpm = ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env);
> }
> if (vpm && !msr_hv) {
> cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_HISI;
> @@ -702,15 +709,7 @@ static void ppc_hash64_set_dsi(CPUState *cs, uint64_t dar, uint64_t dsisr)
> if (msr_dr) {
> vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM1);
> } else {
> - switch (env->mmu_model) {
> - case POWERPC_MMU_3_00:
> - /* Field deprecated in ISAv3.00 - interrupts always go to hyperv */
> - vpm = true;
> - break;
> - default:
> - vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0);
> - break;
> - }
> + vpm = ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env);
> }
> if (vpm && !msr_hv) {
> cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_HDSI;
> @@ -799,7 +798,7 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
> if (!(eaddr >> 63)) {
> raddr |= env->spr[SPR_HRMOR];
> }
> - } else if (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0) {
> + } else if (ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env)) {
> /* Emulated VRMA mode */
> slb = &env->vrma_slb;
> if (!slb->sps) {
> @@ -967,7 +966,7 @@ hwaddr ppc_hash64_get_phys_page_debug(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong addr)
> } else if ((msr_hv || !env->has_hv_mode) && !(addr >> 63)) {
> /* In HV mode, add HRMOR if top EA bit is clear */
> return raddr | env->spr[SPR_HRMOR];
> - } else if (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0) {
> + } else if (ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env)) {
> /* Emulated VRMA mode */
> slb = &env->vrma_slb;
> if (!slb->sps) {
> @@ -1056,8 +1055,7 @@ static void ppc_hash64_update_vrma(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
> slb->sps = NULL;
>
> /* Is VRMA enabled ? */
> - lpcr = env->spr[SPR_LPCR];
> - if (!(lpcr & LPCR_VPM0)) {
> + if (!ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env)) {
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -1065,6 +1063,7 @@ static void ppc_hash64_update_vrma(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
> * Make one up. Mostly ignore the ESID which will not be needed
> * for translation
> */
> + lpcr = env->spr[SPR_LPCR];
> vsid = SLB_VSID_VRMA;
> vrmasd = (lpcr & LPCR_VRMASD) >> LPCR_VRMASD_SHIFT;
> vsid |= (vrmasd << 4) & (SLB_VSID_L | SLB_VSID_LP);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-25 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 23:37 [PATCH v6 00/18] target/ppc: Correct some errors with real mode handling David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] pseries: Update SLOF firmware image David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] ppc: Remove stub support for 32-bit hypervisor mode David Gibson
2020-02-25 6:31 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] ppc: Remove stub of PPC970 HID4 implementation David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] target/ppc: Correct handling of real mode accesses with vhyp on hash MMU David Gibson
2020-02-25 10:29 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] target/ppc: Introduce ppc_hash64_use_vrma() helper David Gibson
2020-02-25 0:12 ` Fabiano Rosas
2020-02-25 10:30 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] spapr, ppc: Remove VPM0/RMLS hacks for POWER9 David Gibson
2020-02-25 11:29 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-25 15:58 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-26 1:00 ` David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] target/ppc: Remove RMOR register from POWER9 & POWER10 David Gibson
2020-02-25 11:30 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] target/ppc: Use class fields to simplify LPCR masking David Gibson
2020-02-25 15:48 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] target/ppc: Streamline calculation of RMA limit from LPCR[RMLS] David Gibson
2020-02-25 17:05 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-25 22:47 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-26 1:04 ` David Gibson
2020-02-26 7:56 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-27 4:25 ` David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] target/ppc: Correct RMLS table David Gibson
2020-02-26 8:23 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] target/ppc: Only calculate RMLS derived RMA limit on demand David Gibson
2020-02-26 13:24 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-27 4:33 ` David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] target/ppc: Don't store VRMA SLBE persistently David Gibson
2020-02-25 0:25 ` Fabiano Rosas
2020-02-26 13:29 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] spapr: Don't use weird units for MIN_RMA_SLOF David Gibson
2020-02-25 7:49 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-02-26 13:32 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] spapr,ppc: Simplify signature of kvmppc_rma_size() David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] spapr: Don't attempt to clamp RMA to VRMA constraint David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] spapr: Don't clamp RMA to 16GiB on new machine types David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] spapr: Clean up RMA size calculation David Gibson
2020-02-25 11:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-26 1:08 ` David Gibson
2020-02-26 13:37 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-27 6:04 ` David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] spapr: Fold spapr_node0_size() into its only caller David Gibson
2020-02-26 14:47 ` Greg Kurz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200225113044.06fb16b7@bahia.home \
--to=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=farosas@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).