qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: lvivier@redhat.com, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	aik@ozlabs.ru, farosas@linux.ibm.com,
	Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, clg@kaod.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
	paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/18] target/ppc: Streamline calculation of RMA limit from LPCR[RMLS]
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:05:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200225180531.6551ce59@bahia.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224233724.46415-10-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:37:15 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

> Currently we use a big switch statement in ppc_hash64_update_rmls() to work
> out what the right RMA limit is based on the LPCR[RMLS] field.  There's no
> formula for this - it's just an arbitrary mapping defined by the existing
> CPU implementations - but we can make it a bit more readable by using a
> lookup table rather than a switch.  In addition we can use the MiB/GiB
> symbols to make it a bit clearer.
> 
> While there we add a bit of clarity and rationale to the comment about
> what happens if the LPCR[RMLS] doesn't contain a valid value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
> ---
>  target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> index 0ef330a614..4f082d775d 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>   * License along with this library; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>   */
>  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "qemu/units.h"
>  #include "cpu.h"
>  #include "exec/exec-all.h"
>  #include "exec/helper-proto.h"This tool was originally developed to fix Linux CPU throttling issues affecting Lenovo T480 / T480s / X1C6 as described here.
> @@ -757,6 +758,39 @@ static void ppc_hash64_set_c(PowerPCCPU *cpu, hwaddr ptex, uint64_t pte1)
>      stb_phys(CPU(cpu)->as, base + offset, (pte1 & 0xff) | 0x80);
>  }
>  
> +static target_ulong rmls_limit(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
> +{
> +    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> +    /*
> +     * This is the full 4 bits encoding of POWER8. Previous
> +     * CPUs only support a subset of these but the filtering
> +     * is done when writing LPCR
> +     */
> +    const target_ulong rma_sizes[] = {
> +        [0] = 0,
> +        [1] = 16 * GiB,
> +        [2] = 1 * GiB,
> +        [3] = 64 * MiB,
> +        [4] = 256 * MiB,
> +        [5] = 0,
> +        [6] = 0,
> +        [7] = 128 * MiB,
> +        [8] = 32 * MiB,
> +    };
> +    target_ulong rmls = (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_RMLS) >> LPCR_RMLS_SHIFT;
> +
> +    if (rmls < ARRAY_SIZE(rma_sizes)) {

This condition is always true since the RMLS field is 4-bit long... I guess
you want to check that RMLS encodes a valid RMA size instead.

    if (rma_sizes[rmls]) {

> +        return rma_sizes[rmls];
> +    } else {
> +        /*
> +         * Bad value, so the OS has shot itself in the foot.  Return a
> +         * 0-sized RMA which we expect to trigger an immediate DSI or
> +         * ISI
> +         */
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
>                                  int rwx, int mmu_idx)
>  {
> @@ -1006,41 +1040,6 @@ void ppc_hash64_tlb_flush_hpte(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong ptex,
>      cpu->env.tlb_need_flush = TLB_NEED_GLOBAL_FLUSH | TLB_NEED_LOCAL_FLUSH;
>  }
>  
> -static void ppc_hash64_update_rmls(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
> -{
> -    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> -    uint64_t lpcr = env->spr[SPR_LPCR];
> -
> -    /*
> -     * This is the full 4 bits encoding of POWER8. Previous
> -     * CPUs only support a subset of these but the filtering
> -     * is done when writing LPCR
> -     */
> -    switch ((lpcr & LPCR_RMLS) >> LPCR_RMLS_SHIFT) {
> -    case 0x8: /* 32MB */
> -        env->rmls = 0x2000000ull;
> -        break;
> -    case 0x3: /* 64MB */
> -        env->rmls = 0x4000000ull;
> -        break;
> -    case 0x7: /* 128MB */
> -        env->rmls = 0x8000000ull;
> -        break;
> -    case 0x4: /* 256MB */
> -        env->rmls = 0x10000000ull;
> -        break;
> -    case 0x2: /* 1GB */
> -        env->rmls = 0x40000000ull;
> -        break;
> -    case 0x1: /* 16GB */
> -        env->rmls = 0x400000000ull;
> -        break;
> -    default:
> -        /* What to do here ??? */
> -        env->rmls = 0;
> -    }
> -}
> -
>  static void ppc_hash64_update_vrma(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>  {
>      CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> @@ -1099,7 +1098,7 @@ void ppc_store_lpcr(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong val)
>      CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
>  
>      env->spr[SPR_LPCR] = val & pcc->lpcr_mask;
> -    ppc_hash64_update_rmls(cpu);
> +    env->rmls = rmls_limit(cpu);
>      ppc_hash64_update_vrma(cpu);
>  }
>  



  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-25 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-24 23:37 [PATCH v6 00/18] target/ppc: Correct some errors with real mode handling David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] pseries: Update SLOF firmware image David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] ppc: Remove stub support for 32-bit hypervisor mode David Gibson
2020-02-25  6:31   ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] ppc: Remove stub of PPC970 HID4 implementation David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] target/ppc: Correct handling of real mode accesses with vhyp on hash MMU David Gibson
2020-02-25 10:29   ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] target/ppc: Introduce ppc_hash64_use_vrma() helper David Gibson
2020-02-25  0:12   ` Fabiano Rosas
2020-02-25 10:30   ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] spapr, ppc: Remove VPM0/RMLS hacks for POWER9 David Gibson
2020-02-25 11:29   ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-25 15:58     ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-26  1:00       ` David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] target/ppc: Remove RMOR register from POWER9 & POWER10 David Gibson
2020-02-25 11:30   ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] target/ppc: Use class fields to simplify LPCR masking David Gibson
2020-02-25 15:48   ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] target/ppc: Streamline calculation of RMA limit from LPCR[RMLS] David Gibson
2020-02-25 17:05   ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2020-02-25 22:47     ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-26  1:04       ` David Gibson
2020-02-26  7:56         ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-27  4:25           ` David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] target/ppc: Correct RMLS table David Gibson
2020-02-26  8:23   ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] target/ppc: Only calculate RMLS derived RMA limit on demand David Gibson
2020-02-26 13:24   ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-27  4:33     ` David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] target/ppc: Don't store VRMA SLBE persistently David Gibson
2020-02-25  0:25   ` Fabiano Rosas
2020-02-26 13:29   ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] spapr: Don't use weird units for MIN_RMA_SLOF David Gibson
2020-02-25  7:49   ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-02-26 13:32   ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] spapr,ppc: Simplify signature of kvmppc_rma_size() David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] spapr: Don't attempt to clamp RMA to VRMA constraint David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] spapr: Don't clamp RMA to 16GiB on new machine types David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] spapr: Clean up RMA size calculation David Gibson
2020-02-25 11:07   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-26  1:08     ` David Gibson
2020-02-26 13:37   ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-27  6:04     ` David Gibson
2020-02-24 23:37 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] spapr: Fold spapr_node0_size() into its only caller David Gibson
2020-02-26 14:47   ` Greg Kurz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200225180531.6551ce59@bahia.home \
    --to=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
    --cc=farosas@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).