From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: pasic@linux.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: correctly turn on VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:12:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200226030945-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <344493874.10686339.1582701636434.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 02:20:36AM -0500, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 03:06:47PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > We turn on device IOTLB via VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM unconditionally on
> > > platform without IOMMU support. This can lead unnecessary IOTLB
> > > transactions which will damage the performance.
> > >
> > > Fixing this by check whether the device is backed by IOMMU and disable
> > > device IOTLB.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > > Fixes: c471ad0e9bd46 ("vhost_net: device IOTLB support")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > hw/virtio/vhost.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> > > index 9edfadc81d..6e12c3d2de 100644
> > > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> > > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> > > @@ -290,7 +290,14 @@ static int vhost_dev_has_iommu(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > > {
> > > VirtIODevice *vdev = dev->vdev;
> > >
> > > - return virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
> > > + /*
> > > + * For vhost, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM means the backend support
> > > + * incremental memory mapping API via IOTLB API. For platform that
> > > + * does not have IOMMU, there's no need to enable this feature
> > > + * which may cause unnecessary IOTLB miss/update trnasactions.
> > > + */
> > > + return vdev->dma_as != &address_space_memory &&
> > > + virtio_has_feature(dev->acked_features,
> > > VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void *vhost_memory_map(struct vhost_dev *dev, hwaddr addr,
> >
> > Why check acked_features and not host features here?
> > I'd worry that if we do it like this, userspace driver
> > within guest can clear the feature and make device access
> > memory directly.
>
> Right, host_features should be more than enough.
>
> >
> > > @@ -765,6 +772,9 @@ static int vhost_dev_set_features(struct vhost_dev
> > > *dev,
> > > if (enable_log) {
> > > features |= 0x1ULL << VHOST_F_LOG_ALL;
> > > }
> > > + if (dev->vdev->dma_as == &address_space_memory) {
> > > + features &= ~(0x1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
> > > + }
> >
> >
> > That's a guest visible change. Which seems at best unnecessary.
> >
>
> I don't get how this can be visible from guest? It works as F_LOG_ALL.
>
> Thanks
Oh you are right.
So just call vhost_dev_has_iommu here too?
> > > r = dev->vhost_ops->vhost_set_features(dev, features);
> > > if (r < 0) {
> > > VHOST_OPS_DEBUG("vhost_set_features failed");
> > > --
> > > 2.19.1
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-26 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-26 7:06 [PATCH] vhost: correctly turn on VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM Jason Wang
2020-02-26 7:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-26 7:20 ` Jason Wang
2020-02-26 8:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-02-26 9:09 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200226030945-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).