qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: "Chenqun (kuhn)" <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Cc: "peter.maydell@linaro.org" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
	"qemu-trivial@nongnu.org" <qemu-trivial@nongnu.org>,
	Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
	Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] block/iscsi:Remove redundant statement in iscsi_open()
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:30:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227103054.GB7493@linux.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7412CDE03601674DA8197E2EBD8937E83B6638BE@dggemm531-mbx.china.huawei.com>

Am 27.02.2020 um 02:49 hat Chenqun (kuhn) geschrieben:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Kevin Wolf [mailto:kwolf@redhat.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 5:55 PM
> >To: Chenqun (kuhn) <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
> >Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-trivial@nongnu.org;
> >peter.maydell@linaro.org; Zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>;
> >Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>; Ronnie Sahlberg
> ><ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>; Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>; Peter
> >Lieven <pl@kamp.de>; Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] block/iscsi:Remove redundant statement in
> >iscsi_open()
> >
> >Am 26.02.2020 um 09:46 hat kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com geschrieben:
> >> From: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Clang static code analyzer show warning:
> >>   block/iscsi.c:1920:9: warning: Value stored to 'flags' is never read
> >>         flags &= ~BDRV_O_RDWR;
> >>         ^        ~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
> >
> >Hmm, I'm not so sure about this one because if we remove the line, flags will
> >be inconsistent with bs->open_flags. It feels like setting a trap for anyone
> >who wants to add code using flags in the future.
> Hi Kevin,  
> I find it exists since 8f3bf50d34037266.   :  )  

Yes, it has existed from the start with auto-read-only.

> It's not a big deal,  just upset clang static code analyzer. 
> As you said, it could be a trap for the future. 

What's interesting is that we do have one user of the flags later in the
function, but it uses bs->open_flags instead:

    ret = iscsi_allocmap_init(iscsilun, bs->open_flags);

Maybe this should be using flags? (The value of the bits we're
interested in is the same, but when flags is passed as a parameter, I
would expect it to be used.)

Kevin



  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-27 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-26  8:46 [PATCH v2 00/13] redundant code: Fix warnings reported by Clang static code analyzer kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] block/stream: Remove redundant statement in stream_run() kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-26  9:51   ` Kevin Wolf
2020-02-26 10:21     ` Chenqun (kuhn)
2020-02-26 10:36       ` Kevin Wolf
2020-02-26 10:41         ` Chenqun (kuhn)
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] block/iscsi:Remove redundant statement in iscsi_open() kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-26  9:54   ` Kevin Wolf
2020-02-27  1:49     ` Chenqun (kuhn)
2020-02-27 10:30       ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2020-02-27 11:28         ` Chenqun (kuhn)
2020-02-28  7:30         ` Chenqun (kuhn)
2020-02-28 10:55           ` Kevin Wolf
2020-02-29  2:21             ` Chenqun (kuhn)
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] block/file-posix: Remove redundant statement in raw_handle_perm_lock() kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-26 10:37   ` Kevin Wolf
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] scsi/esp-pci: Remove redundant statement in esp_pci_io_write() kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] scsi/scsi-disk: Remove redundant statement in scsi_disk_emulate_command() kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] display/pxa2xx_lcd: Remove redundant statement in pxa2xx_palette_parse() kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] display/exynos4210_fimd: Remove redundant statement in exynos4210_fimd_update() kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] display/blizzard: Remove redundant statement in blizzard_draw_line16_32() kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] dma/xlnx-zdma: Remove redundant statement in zdma_write_dst() kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-26  8:51   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-26 14:15   ` Francisco Iglesias
2020-02-26 17:56   ` Alistair Francis
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] migration/vmstate: Remove redundant statement in vmstate_save_state_v() kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-27 18:01   ` Juan Quintela
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] timer/exynos4210_mct: Remove redundant statement in exynos4210_mct_write() kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] usb/hcd-ehci: Remove redundant statements kuhn.chenqun
2020-03-09 10:13   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-02-26  8:46 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] monitor/hmp-cmds: Remove redundant statement in hmp_rocker_of_dpa_groups() kuhn.chenqun
2020-02-26  8:52   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200227103054.GB7493@linux.fritz.box \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=euler.robot@huawei.com \
    --cc=kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).