From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/18] s390x: protvirt: Inhibit balloon when switching to protected mode
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:24:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227132402.67a38047.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58a51f40-21c7-5737-4f4c-568fdd2477fa@linux.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5678 bytes --]
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:11:03 +0100
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 2/26/20 3:59 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 26.02.20 13:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
> >> Ballooning in protected VMs can only be done when the guest shares the
> >> pages it gives to the host. Hence, until we have a solution for this
> >> in the guest kernel, we inhibit ballooning when switching into
> >> protected mode and reverse that once we move out of it.
> >
> > I don't understand what you mean here, sorry. zapping a page will mean
> > that a fresh one will be faulted in when accessed. And AFAIK, that means
> > it will be encrypted again when needed.
>
> Yes, as soon as the host alters non-shared memory we'll run into
> integrity issues.
>
>
> I've been talking to Halil after I sent this out and it looks like we'll
> rather try to automatically enable the IOMMU for all devices when
> switching into protected mode. He said that if the IOMMU is set the
> balloon code will do an early exit on feature negotiation.
>
I have a discussion starter RFC for you.
--------------------------8<----------------------------------------------
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:48:21 +0100
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/1] virtio-ccw: auto-manage VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM
The virtio specification tells that the device is to present
VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM (a.k.a. VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM) when the
device "can only access certain memory addresses with said access
specified and/or granted by the platform". This is the case for a
protected VM, as the device can access only memory addresses that are in
pages that are currently shared (only the guest can share/unsare its
page).
No VM however starts out as a protected VM, but some VMs may be
converted to protected VMs if the guest decides so.
Making the end user explicitly manage the VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM via
the property iommu_on is a minor disaster. If the correctness of the
paravirtualized virtio devices depends (and thus in a sense the
correctness of the hypervisor), then the hypervisor should have the last
word about whether VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM is to be presented or not.
Let's manage the VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM virtio feature automatically
for virtio-ccw devices, so that we set it before we start the protected
configuration, and unset it when our VM is not protected.
Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
---
NOTES:
* I wanted to have a discussion starter fast, there are multiple open
questions.
* Doing more than one system_resets() is hackish. We
should look into this.
* The user interface implications of this patch are also an ugly can of
worms. Needs to be discussed.
* We should consider keeping the original value if !pv and restoring it
on pv --> !pv, instead of forcing to unset when leaving pv, and actually
not forcing unset when !pv.
* It might make sense to do something like this in virtio core, but I
decided start the discussion with a ccw-only change.
* Maybe we need a machine option that enables this sort of behavior,
especially if we decide not to do the conserving/restoring.
* Lightly tested.
---
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 4 ++--
hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 13 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index 0f4455d1df..996124f152 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static void s390_machine_unprotect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
ms->pv = false;
}
migrate_del_blocker(pv_mig_blocker);
- qemu_balloon_inhibit(false);
+ subsystem_reset();
}
static int s390_machine_protect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
@@ -346,7 +346,6 @@ static int s390_machine_protect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
CPUState *t;
int rc;
- qemu_balloon_inhibit(true);
if (!pv_mig_blocker) {
error_setg(&pv_mig_blocker,
"protected VMs are currently not migrateable.");
@@ -384,6 +383,7 @@ static int s390_machine_protect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
if (rc) {
goto out_err;
}
+ subsystem_reset();
return rc;
out_err:
diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
index 13f57e7b67..48bb54f68e 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
@@ -869,12 +869,24 @@ static void virtio_ccw_notify(DeviceState *d, uint16_t vector)
}
}
+static inline void virtio_ccw_pv_enforce_features(VirtIODevice *vdev)
+{
+ S390CcwMachineState *ms = S390_CCW_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
+
+ if (ms->pv) {
+ virtio_add_feature(&vdev->host_features, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
+ } else {
+ virtio_clear_feature(&vdev->host_features, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
+ }
+}
+
static void virtio_ccw_reset(DeviceState *d)
{
VirtioCcwDevice *dev = VIRTIO_CCW_DEVICE(d);
VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&dev->bus);
VirtIOCCWDeviceClass *vdc = VIRTIO_CCW_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(dev);
+ virtio_ccw_pv_enforce_features(vdev);
virtio_ccw_reset_virtio(dev, vdev);
if (vdc->parent_reset) {
vdc->parent_reset(d);
@@ -1103,6 +1115,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_pre_plugged(DeviceState *d, Error **errp)
if (dev->max_rev >= 1) {
virtio_add_feature(&vdev->host_features, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
}
+ virtio_ccw_pv_enforce_features(vdev);
}
/* This is called by virtio-bus just after the device is plugged. */
base-commit: 8665f2475f5999d4c9f33598f1360f0b0797c489
--
2.17.1
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-26 12:20 [PATCH v5 00/18] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] s390x: Use constant for ESA PSW address Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 13:46 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-26 13:47 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 14:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-26 17:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-26 17:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-27 7:53 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-27 8:09 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-27 9:06 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-27 9:23 ` [PATCH v6] s390x: Rename and use constants for short PSW address and mask Janosch Frank
2020-02-27 9:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-27 10:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] Sync pv Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 14:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-26 14:08 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 15:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-26 15:11 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] s390x: protvirt: Inhibit balloon when switching to protected mode Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 14:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-26 15:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-26 15:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-26 15:30 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 15:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-26 18:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-03-03 12:42 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-26 15:11 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 15:13 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-26 15:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-27 12:24 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2020-03-19 13:42 ` Halil Pasic
2020-03-19 13:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-19 15:40 ` Halil Pasic
2020-03-19 17:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-20 18:43 ` Halil Pasic
2020-03-24 21:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2020-03-27 10:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-19 17:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-03-20 9:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-29 14:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-03-31 8:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1 Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] docs: Add protvirt docs Janosch Frank
2020-02-26 20:09 ` [PATCH v5 00/18] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Cornelia Huck
2020-02-27 8:32 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-03 15:50 ` [PATCH] pc-bios: s390x: Save iplb location in lowcore Janosch Frank
2020-03-03 16:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 8:59 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200227132402.67a38047.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).