From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB933C3F2CD for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A143D20842 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="TfETJPez" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A143D20842 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:47060 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j97O9-0004vc-Ml for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:15:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52715) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j97NM-0004Wj-Qt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:14:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j97NL-00026A-1X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:14:20 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:60003 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j97NK-00025M-TI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:14:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583241257; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sGX5weHl/srTQUTGPbW8ZIx0c6Lwp81l2kllP3d9uAY=; b=TfETJPezw9nqla7IQX/GpXZbEyvJ4eOn2AhcplHGLgHcxNt4RG51svz3mOrPS3SJBX2au+ o2lY6lE4NqfvioPhWXI08U/UwlnPERuhMIQzFQJhft2T8c+73DYCwNliP4tkp2xpzRFwne M9W7spx1zTLAgDAxmqCtDTTW7rNG9O4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-435-bsA30IFjNEGy_L7vbyPs2Q-1; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:14:12 -0500 X-MC-Unique: bsA30IFjNEGy_L7vbyPs2Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E53761005512; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-112-56.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.56]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ECDD73869; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:14:07 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Thorsten Glaser Subject: Re: qemu-system-x86_64: warning: Unknown X11 keycode mapping ''. Message-ID: <20200303131407.GF1773352@redhat.com> References: <20200302102841.GD1679990@redhat.com> <20200303104431.GB1773352@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.13.3 (2020-01-12) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.81 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 02:12:04PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: >=20 > > AFAICT, this is not the case. On both my Fedora & Debian installs, > > x11vnc is just a binary that attaches to an existing X11 server >=20 > Huh, weird. Perhaps this changed over the years and distro releases. >=20 > > $ ls -al /usr/bin/vncserver >=20 > $ realpath $(which vncserver) > /usr/bin/tightvncserver >=20 > This does surprise me, because I also have x11vnc installed and > vaguely remember using it in standalone server mode for a while. >=20 > But, yes, tightvncserver 1:1.3.9-9.1 is also installed, so I=E2=80=99m > apparently using that. Thanks, that gives me something to try to reproduce the problem now. Regards, Daniel --=20 |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange= :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com= :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange= :|