qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use
@ 2020-03-04 15:33 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel
  Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
	David Gibson

This series fixes a dangerous zero-length array use.
Simples patches first to clean the issue in the last patch:
dissociate the buffer holding DMA requests with pointer to
SRP Information Unit packets.

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (5):
  hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include
  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible
    array
  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit
  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper
  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size

 hw/scsi/viosrp.h      |  4 ++-
 hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

-- 
2.21.1



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include
  2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-04 15:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2020-03-05  0:39   ` David Gibson
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel
  Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
	David Gibson

This header use the srp_* structures declared in "hw/scsi/srp.h".

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 hw/scsi/viosrp.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
index d8e365db1e..25676c2383 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
+++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
 #ifndef PPC_VIOSRP_H
 #define PPC_VIOSRP_H
 
+#include "hw/scsi/srp.h"
+
 #define SRP_VERSION "16.a"
 #define SRP_MAX_IU_LEN    256
 #define SRP_MAX_LOC_LEN 32
-- 
2.21.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array
  2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-04 15:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2020-03-05  0:40   ` David Gibson
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel
  Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
	David Gibson

Replace sizeof() flexible arrays union srp_iu/viosrp_iu by the
SRP_MAX_IU_LEN definition, which is what this code actually meant
to use.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 7d584e7732..7e397ed797 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -671,8 +671,8 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
      */
     rsp->req_lim_delta = cpu_to_be32(VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT-2);
     rsp->tag = tag;
-    rsp->max_it_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(sizeof(union srp_iu));
-    rsp->max_ti_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(sizeof(union srp_iu));
+    rsp->max_it_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(SRP_MAX_IU_LEN);
+    rsp->max_ti_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(SRP_MAX_IU_LEN);
     /* direct and indirect */
     rsp->buf_fmt = cpu_to_be16(SRP_BUF_FORMAT_DIRECT | SRP_BUF_FORMAT_INDIRECT);
 
@@ -1088,7 +1088,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq *crq)
      * in our 256 bytes IUs. If not we'll have to increase the size
      * of the structure.
      */
-    if (crq->s.IU_length > sizeof(union viosrp_iu)) {
+    if (crq->s.IU_length > SRP_MAX_IU_LEN) {
         fprintf(stderr, "VSCSI: SRP IU too long (%d bytes) !\n",
                 crq->s.IU_length);
         vscsi_put_req(req);
-- 
2.21.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit
  2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-04 15:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2020-03-05  0:40   ` David Gibson
  2020-03-05 10:21   ` Greg Kurz
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  4 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel
  Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
	David Gibson

We already have a ui pointer, use it (to simplify the next commit).

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 7e397ed797..3cb5a38181 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -261,9 +261,9 @@ static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
     if (status) {
         iu->srp.rsp.sol_not = (sol_not & 0x04) >> 2;
         if (req->senselen) {
-            req->iu.srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
-            req->iu.srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
-            memcpy(req->iu.srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
+            iu->srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
+            iu->srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
+            memcpy(iu->srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
             total_len += req->senselen;
         }
     } else {
-- 
2.21.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper
  2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-04 15:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2020-03-05  0:41   ` David Gibson
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel
  Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
	David Gibson

Introduce the req_ui() helper which returns a pointer to
the viosrp_iu union held in the vscsi_req structure.
This simplifies the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 3cb5a38181..f1a0bbdc31 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ typedef struct {
     vscsi_req reqs[VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT];
 } VSCSIState;
 
+static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
+{
+    return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
+}
+
+
 static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_get_req(VSCSIState *s)
 {
     vscsi_req *req;
@@ -121,7 +127,7 @@ static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_find_req(VSCSIState *s, uint64_t srp_tag)
 
     for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
         req = &s->reqs[i];
-        if (req->iu.srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
+        if (req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
             return req;
         }
     }
@@ -188,7 +194,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
     req->crq.s.reserved = 0x00;
     req->crq.s.timeout = cpu_to_be16(0x0000);
     req->crq.s.IU_length = cpu_to_be16(length);
-    req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req->iu.srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
+    req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req_iu(req)->srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
 
     if (rc == 0) {
         req->crq.s.status = VIOSRP_OK;
@@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ static void vscsi_makeup_sense(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
 static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
                           uint8_t status, int32_t res_in, int32_t res_out)
 {
-    union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
+    union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
     uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
     int total_len = sizeof(iu->srp.rsp);
     uint8_t sol_not = iu->srp.cmd.sol_not;
@@ -285,7 +291,7 @@ static int vscsi_fetch_desc(VSCSIState *s, struct vscsi_req *req,
                             unsigned n, unsigned buf_offset,
                             struct srp_direct_buf *ret)
 {
-    struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
+    struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
 
     switch (req->dma_fmt) {
     case SRP_NO_DATA_DESC: {
@@ -473,7 +479,7 @@ static int data_out_desc_size(struct srp_cmd *cmd)
 
 static int vscsi_preprocess_desc(vscsi_req *req)
 {
-    struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
+    struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
 
     req->cdb_offset = cmd->add_cdb_len & ~3;
 
@@ -655,7 +661,7 @@ static void *vscsi_load_request(QEMUFile *f, SCSIRequest *sreq)
 
 static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
 {
-    union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
+    union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
     struct srp_login_rsp *rsp = &iu->srp.login_rsp;
     uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
 
@@ -681,7 +687,7 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
 
 static void vscsi_inquiry_no_target(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
 {
-    uint8_t *cdb = req->iu.srp.cmd.cdb;
+    uint8_t *cdb = req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.cdb;
     uint8_t resp_data[36];
     int rc, len, alen;
 
@@ -770,7 +776,7 @@ static void vscsi_report_luns(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
 
 static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
 {
-    union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
+    union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
     SCSIDevice *sdev;
     int n, lun;
 
@@ -821,7 +827,7 @@ static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
 
 static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
 {
-    union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
+    union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
     vscsi_req *tmpreq;
     int i, lun = 0, resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_COMPLETE;
     SCSIDevice *d;
@@ -831,7 +837,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
     fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt %02x\n",
             iu->srp.tsk_mgmt.tsk_mgmt_func);
 
-    d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus, be64_to_cpu(req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
+    d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus,
+                          be64_to_cpu(req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
     if (!d) {
         resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
     } else {
@@ -842,7 +849,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
                 break;
             }
 
-            tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
+            tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
             if (tmpreq && tmpreq->sreq) {
                 assert(tmpreq->sreq->hba_private);
                 scsi_req_cancel(tmpreq->sreq);
@@ -867,7 +874,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
 
             for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
                 tmpreq = &s->reqs[i];
-                if (tmpreq->iu.srp.cmd.lun != req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
+                if (req_iu(tmpreq)->srp.cmd.lun
+                        != req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
                     continue;
                 }
                 if (!tmpreq->active || !tmpreq->sreq) {
@@ -911,7 +919,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
 
 static int vscsi_handle_srp_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
 {
-    union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
+    union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
     int done = 1;
     uint8_t opcode = srp->rsp.opcode;
 
@@ -948,7 +956,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_adapter_info(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
     struct mad_adapter_info_data info;
     int rc;
 
-    sinfo = &req->iu.mad.adapter_info;
+    sinfo = &req_iu(req)->mad.adapter_info;
 
 #if 0 /* What for ? */
     rc = spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, be64_to_cpu(sinfo->buffer),
@@ -984,7 +992,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
     uint64_t buffer;
     int rc;
 
-    vcap = &req->iu.mad.capabilities;
+    vcap = &req_iu(req)->mad.capabilities;
     req_len = len = be16_to_cpu(vcap->common.length);
     buffer = be64_to_cpu(vcap->buffer);
     if (len > sizeof(cap)) {
@@ -1029,7 +1037,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
 
 static int vscsi_handle_mad_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
 {
-    union mad_iu *mad = &req->iu.mad;
+    union mad_iu *mad = &req_iu(req)->mad;
     bool request_handled = false;
     uint64_t retlen = 0;
 
-- 
2.21.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size
  2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-04 15:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2020-03-05  0:43   ` David Gibson
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel
  Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
	David Gibson

The 'union srp_iu' is meant as a pointer to any SRP Information
Unit type, it is not related to the size of a VIO DMA buffer.

Use a plain buffer for the VIO DMA read/write calls.
We can remove the reserved buffer from the 'union srp_iu'.

This issue was noticed when replacing the zero-length arrays
from hw/scsi/srp.h with flexible array member,
'clang -fsanitize=undefined' reported:

  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c:69:29: error: field 'iu' with variable sized type 'union viosrp_iu' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU extension [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
       union viosrp_iu         iu;
                               ^

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 hw/scsi/viosrp.h      |  2 +-
 hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
index 25676c2383..aba3203028 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
+++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ union srp_iu {
     struct srp_tsk_mgmt tsk_mgmt;
     struct srp_cmd cmd;
     struct srp_rsp rsp;
-    uint8_t reserved[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
 };
+_Static_assert(sizeof(union srp_iu) <= SRP_MAX_IU_LEN, "srp_iu size incorrect");
 
 enum viosrp_crq_formats {
     VIOSRP_SRP_FORMAT = 0x01,
diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index f1a0bbdc31..f9be68e44e 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ typedef union vscsi_crq {
 
 typedef struct vscsi_req {
     vscsi_crq               crq;
-    union viosrp_iu         iu;
+    uint8_t                 viosrp_iu_buf[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
 
     /* SCSI request tracking */
     SCSIRequest             *sreq;
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ typedef struct {
 
 static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
 {
-    return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
+    return (union viosrp_iu *)req->viosrp_iu_buf;
 }
 
 
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
 
     /* First copy the SRP */
     rc = spapr_vio_dma_write(&s->vdev, req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr,
-                             &req->iu, length);
+                             &req->viosrp_iu_buf, length);
     if (rc) {
         fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_send_iu: DMA write failure !\n");
     }
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_vscsi_req = {
     .minimum_version_id = 1,
     .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
         VMSTATE_BUFFER(crq.raw, vscsi_req),
-        VMSTATE_BUFFER(iu.srp.reserved, vscsi_req),
+        VMSTATE_BUFFER(viosrp_iu_buf, vscsi_req),
         VMSTATE_UINT32(qtag, vscsi_req),
         VMSTATE_BOOL(active, vscsi_req),
         VMSTATE_UINT32(data_len, vscsi_req),
@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq *crq)
     }
 
     /* XXX Handle failure differently ? */
-    if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->iu,
+    if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->viosrp_iu_buf,
                            crq->s.IU_length)) {
         fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_got_payload: DMA read failure !\n");
         vscsi_put_req(req);
-- 
2.21.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05  0:39   ` David Gibson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2020-03-05  0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 856 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:07PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> This header use the srp_* structures declared in "hw/scsi/srp.h".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>

Applied to ppc-for-5.0.

> ---
>  hw/scsi/viosrp.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
> index d8e365db1e..25676c2383 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
> +++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
>  #ifndef PPC_VIOSRP_H
>  #define PPC_VIOSRP_H
>  
> +#include "hw/scsi/srp.h"
> +
>  #define SRP_VERSION "16.a"
>  #define SRP_MAX_IU_LEN    256
>  #define SRP_MAX_LOC_LEN 32

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05  0:40   ` David Gibson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2020-03-05  0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1768 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:08PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Replace sizeof() flexible arrays union srp_iu/viosrp_iu by the
> SRP_MAX_IU_LEN definition, which is what this code actually meant
> to use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>

Applied to ppc-for-5.0

> ---
>  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> index 7d584e7732..7e397ed797 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> @@ -671,8 +671,8 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>       */
>      rsp->req_lim_delta = cpu_to_be32(VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT-2);
>      rsp->tag = tag;
> -    rsp->max_it_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(sizeof(union srp_iu));
> -    rsp->max_ti_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(sizeof(union srp_iu));
> +    rsp->max_it_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(SRP_MAX_IU_LEN);
> +    rsp->max_ti_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(SRP_MAX_IU_LEN);
>      /* direct and indirect */
>      rsp->buf_fmt = cpu_to_be16(SRP_BUF_FORMAT_DIRECT | SRP_BUF_FORMAT_INDIRECT);
>  
> @@ -1088,7 +1088,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq *crq)
>       * in our 256 bytes IUs. If not we'll have to increase the size
>       * of the structure.
>       */
> -    if (crq->s.IU_length > sizeof(union viosrp_iu)) {
> +    if (crq->s.IU_length > SRP_MAX_IU_LEN) {
>          fprintf(stderr, "VSCSI: SRP IU too long (%d bytes) !\n",
>                  crq->s.IU_length);
>          vscsi_put_req(req);

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05  0:40   ` David Gibson
  2020-03-05 10:21   ` Greg Kurz
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2020-03-05  0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1380 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:09PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> We already have a ui pointer, use it (to simplify the next commit).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>

Applied to ppc-for-5.0.

> ---
>  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> index 7e397ed797..3cb5a38181 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> @@ -261,9 +261,9 @@ static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
>      if (status) {
>          iu->srp.rsp.sol_not = (sol_not & 0x04) >> 2;
>          if (req->senselen) {
> -            req->iu.srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
> -            req->iu.srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
> -            memcpy(req->iu.srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
> +            iu->srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
> +            iu->srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
> +            memcpy(iu->srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
>              total_len += req->senselen;
>          }
>      } else {

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05  0:41   ` David Gibson
  2020-03-05  0:42     ` David Gibson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2020-03-05  0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7279 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:10PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Introduce the req_ui() helper which returns a pointer to
> the viosrp_iu union held in the vscsi_req structure.
> This simplifies the next patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> index 3cb5a38181..f1a0bbdc31 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ typedef struct {
>      vscsi_req reqs[VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT];
>  } VSCSIState;
>  
> +static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
> +{
> +    return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;

I guess it doesn't really matter since you remove it in the next
patch, but this seems a really weird way of expressing
	return &req->iu;

> +}
> +
> +
>  static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_get_req(VSCSIState *s)
>  {
>      vscsi_req *req;
> @@ -121,7 +127,7 @@ static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_find_req(VSCSIState *s, uint64_t srp_tag)
>  
>      for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
>          req = &s->reqs[i];
> -        if (req->iu.srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
> +        if (req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
>              return req;
>          }
>      }
> @@ -188,7 +194,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
>      req->crq.s.reserved = 0x00;
>      req->crq.s.timeout = cpu_to_be16(0x0000);
>      req->crq.s.IU_length = cpu_to_be16(length);
> -    req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req->iu.srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
> +    req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req_iu(req)->srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
>  
>      if (rc == 0) {
>          req->crq.s.status = VIOSRP_OK;
> @@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ static void vscsi_makeup_sense(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
>  static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
>                            uint8_t status, int32_t res_in, int32_t res_out)
>  {
> -    union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> +    union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
>      uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
>      int total_len = sizeof(iu->srp.rsp);
>      uint8_t sol_not = iu->srp.cmd.sol_not;
> @@ -285,7 +291,7 @@ static int vscsi_fetch_desc(VSCSIState *s, struct vscsi_req *req,
>                              unsigned n, unsigned buf_offset,
>                              struct srp_direct_buf *ret)
>  {
> -    struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
> +    struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
>  
>      switch (req->dma_fmt) {
>      case SRP_NO_DATA_DESC: {
> @@ -473,7 +479,7 @@ static int data_out_desc_size(struct srp_cmd *cmd)
>  
>  static int vscsi_preprocess_desc(vscsi_req *req)
>  {
> -    struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
> +    struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
>  
>      req->cdb_offset = cmd->add_cdb_len & ~3;
>  
> @@ -655,7 +661,7 @@ static void *vscsi_load_request(QEMUFile *f, SCSIRequest *sreq)
>  
>  static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>  {
> -    union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> +    union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
>      struct srp_login_rsp *rsp = &iu->srp.login_rsp;
>      uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
>  
> @@ -681,7 +687,7 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>  
>  static void vscsi_inquiry_no_target(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>  {
> -    uint8_t *cdb = req->iu.srp.cmd.cdb;
> +    uint8_t *cdb = req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.cdb;
>      uint8_t resp_data[36];
>      int rc, len, alen;
>  
> @@ -770,7 +776,7 @@ static void vscsi_report_luns(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>  
>  static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>  {
> -    union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
> +    union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
>      SCSIDevice *sdev;
>      int n, lun;
>  
> @@ -821,7 +827,7 @@ static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>  
>  static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>  {
> -    union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> +    union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
>      vscsi_req *tmpreq;
>      int i, lun = 0, resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_COMPLETE;
>      SCSIDevice *d;
> @@ -831,7 +837,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>      fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt %02x\n",
>              iu->srp.tsk_mgmt.tsk_mgmt_func);
>  
> -    d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus, be64_to_cpu(req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
> +    d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus,
> +                          be64_to_cpu(req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
>      if (!d) {
>          resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
>      } else {
> @@ -842,7 +849,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>                  break;
>              }
>  
> -            tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
> +            tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
>              if (tmpreq && tmpreq->sreq) {
>                  assert(tmpreq->sreq->hba_private);
>                  scsi_req_cancel(tmpreq->sreq);
> @@ -867,7 +874,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>  
>              for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
>                  tmpreq = &s->reqs[i];
> -                if (tmpreq->iu.srp.cmd.lun != req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
> +                if (req_iu(tmpreq)->srp.cmd.lun
> +                        != req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
>                      continue;
>                  }
>                  if (!tmpreq->active || !tmpreq->sreq) {
> @@ -911,7 +919,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>  
>  static int vscsi_handle_srp_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>  {
> -    union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
> +    union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
>      int done = 1;
>      uint8_t opcode = srp->rsp.opcode;
>  
> @@ -948,7 +956,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_adapter_info(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>      struct mad_adapter_info_data info;
>      int rc;
>  
> -    sinfo = &req->iu.mad.adapter_info;
> +    sinfo = &req_iu(req)->mad.adapter_info;
>  
>  #if 0 /* What for ? */
>      rc = spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, be64_to_cpu(sinfo->buffer),
> @@ -984,7 +992,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>      uint64_t buffer;
>      int rc;
>  
> -    vcap = &req->iu.mad.capabilities;
> +    vcap = &req_iu(req)->mad.capabilities;
>      req_len = len = be16_to_cpu(vcap->common.length);
>      buffer = be64_to_cpu(vcap->buffer);
>      if (len > sizeof(cap)) {
> @@ -1029,7 +1037,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>  
>  static int vscsi_handle_mad_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>  {
> -    union mad_iu *mad = &req->iu.mad;
> +    union mad_iu *mad = &req_iu(req)->mad;
>      bool request_handled = false;
>      uint64_t retlen = 0;
>  

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper
  2020-03-05  0:41   ` David Gibson
@ 2020-03-05  0:42     ` David Gibson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2020-03-05  0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7761 bytes --]

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 11:41:37AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:10PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Introduce the req_ui() helper which returns a pointer to
> > the viosrp_iu union held in the vscsi_req structure.
> > This simplifies the next patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> > index 3cb5a38181..f1a0bbdc31 100644
> > --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> > +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> > @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ typedef struct {
> >      vscsi_req reqs[VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT];
> >  } VSCSIState;
> >  
> > +static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
> > +{
> > +    return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
> 
> I guess it doesn't really matter since you remove it in the next
> patch, but this seems a really weird way of expressing
> 	return &req->iu;

Oh, also s/req_ui/req_iu/g in the commit message.

> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> >  static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_get_req(VSCSIState *s)
> >  {
> >      vscsi_req *req;
> > @@ -121,7 +127,7 @@ static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_find_req(VSCSIState *s, uint64_t srp_tag)
> >  
> >      for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
> >          req = &s->reqs[i];
> > -        if (req->iu.srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
> > +        if (req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
> >              return req;
> >          }
> >      }
> > @@ -188,7 +194,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> >      req->crq.s.reserved = 0x00;
> >      req->crq.s.timeout = cpu_to_be16(0x0000);
> >      req->crq.s.IU_length = cpu_to_be16(length);
> > -    req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req->iu.srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
> > +    req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req_iu(req)->srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
> >  
> >      if (rc == 0) {
> >          req->crq.s.status = VIOSRP_OK;
> > @@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ static void vscsi_makeup_sense(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> >  static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> >                            uint8_t status, int32_t res_in, int32_t res_out)
> >  {
> > -    union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> > +    union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> >      uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
> >      int total_len = sizeof(iu->srp.rsp);
> >      uint8_t sol_not = iu->srp.cmd.sol_not;
> > @@ -285,7 +291,7 @@ static int vscsi_fetch_desc(VSCSIState *s, struct vscsi_req *req,
> >                              unsigned n, unsigned buf_offset,
> >                              struct srp_direct_buf *ret)
> >  {
> > -    struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
> > +    struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
> >  
> >      switch (req->dma_fmt) {
> >      case SRP_NO_DATA_DESC: {
> > @@ -473,7 +479,7 @@ static int data_out_desc_size(struct srp_cmd *cmd)
> >  
> >  static int vscsi_preprocess_desc(vscsi_req *req)
> >  {
> > -    struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
> > +    struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
> >  
> >      req->cdb_offset = cmd->add_cdb_len & ~3;
> >  
> > @@ -655,7 +661,7 @@ static void *vscsi_load_request(QEMUFile *f, SCSIRequest *sreq)
> >  
> >  static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >  {
> > -    union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> > +    union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> >      struct srp_login_rsp *rsp = &iu->srp.login_rsp;
> >      uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
> >  
> > @@ -681,7 +687,7 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >  
> >  static void vscsi_inquiry_no_target(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >  {
> > -    uint8_t *cdb = req->iu.srp.cmd.cdb;
> > +    uint8_t *cdb = req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.cdb;
> >      uint8_t resp_data[36];
> >      int rc, len, alen;
> >  
> > @@ -770,7 +776,7 @@ static void vscsi_report_luns(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >  
> >  static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >  {
> > -    union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
> > +    union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
> >      SCSIDevice *sdev;
> >      int n, lun;
> >  
> > @@ -821,7 +827,7 @@ static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >  
> >  static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >  {
> > -    union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> > +    union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> >      vscsi_req *tmpreq;
> >      int i, lun = 0, resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_COMPLETE;
> >      SCSIDevice *d;
> > @@ -831,7 +837,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >      fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt %02x\n",
> >              iu->srp.tsk_mgmt.tsk_mgmt_func);
> >  
> > -    d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus, be64_to_cpu(req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
> > +    d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus,
> > +                          be64_to_cpu(req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
> >      if (!d) {
> >          resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
> >      } else {
> > @@ -842,7 +849,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >                  break;
> >              }
> >  
> > -            tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
> > +            tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
> >              if (tmpreq && tmpreq->sreq) {
> >                  assert(tmpreq->sreq->hba_private);
> >                  scsi_req_cancel(tmpreq->sreq);
> > @@ -867,7 +874,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >  
> >              for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
> >                  tmpreq = &s->reqs[i];
> > -                if (tmpreq->iu.srp.cmd.lun != req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
> > +                if (req_iu(tmpreq)->srp.cmd.lun
> > +                        != req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
> >                      continue;
> >                  }
> >                  if (!tmpreq->active || !tmpreq->sreq) {
> > @@ -911,7 +919,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >  
> >  static int vscsi_handle_srp_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >  {
> > -    union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
> > +    union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
> >      int done = 1;
> >      uint8_t opcode = srp->rsp.opcode;
> >  
> > @@ -948,7 +956,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_adapter_info(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >      struct mad_adapter_info_data info;
> >      int rc;
> >  
> > -    sinfo = &req->iu.mad.adapter_info;
> > +    sinfo = &req_iu(req)->mad.adapter_info;
> >  
> >  #if 0 /* What for ? */
> >      rc = spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, be64_to_cpu(sinfo->buffer),
> > @@ -984,7 +992,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >      uint64_t buffer;
> >      int rc;
> >  
> > -    vcap = &req->iu.mad.capabilities;
> > +    vcap = &req_iu(req)->mad.capabilities;
> >      req_len = len = be16_to_cpu(vcap->common.length);
> >      buffer = be64_to_cpu(vcap->buffer);
> >      if (len > sizeof(cap)) {
> > @@ -1029,7 +1037,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >  
> >  static int vscsi_handle_mad_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >  {
> > -    union mad_iu *mad = &req->iu.mad;
> > +    union mad_iu *mad = &req_iu(req)->mad;
> >      bool request_handled = false;
> >      uint64_t retlen = 0;
> >  
> 



-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05  0:43   ` David Gibson
  2020-03-05  6:47     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2020-03-05  0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3769 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:11PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The 'union srp_iu' is meant as a pointer to any SRP Information
> Unit type, it is not related to the size of a VIO DMA buffer.
> 
> Use a plain buffer for the VIO DMA read/write calls.
> We can remove the reserved buffer from the 'union srp_iu'.
> 
> This issue was noticed when replacing the zero-length arrays
> from hw/scsi/srp.h with flexible array member,
> 'clang -fsanitize=undefined' reported:
> 
>   hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c:69:29: error: field 'iu' with variable sized type 'union viosrp_iu' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU extension [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
>        union viosrp_iu         iu;
>                                ^
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/scsi/viosrp.h      |  2 +-
>  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 10 +++++-----
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
> index 25676c2383..aba3203028 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
> +++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ union srp_iu {
>      struct srp_tsk_mgmt tsk_mgmt;
>      struct srp_cmd cmd;
>      struct srp_rsp rsp;
> -    uint8_t reserved[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
>  };
> +_Static_assert(sizeof(union srp_iu) <= SRP_MAX_IU_LEN, "srp_iu size incorrect");

Hrm.  Given that srp_iu will be a variably sized type, is this
assertion actually testing anything meaningful?


Otherwise, LGTM.

>  
>  enum viosrp_crq_formats {
>      VIOSRP_SRP_FORMAT = 0x01,
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> index f1a0bbdc31..f9be68e44e 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ typedef union vscsi_crq {
>  
>  typedef struct vscsi_req {
>      vscsi_crq               crq;
> -    union viosrp_iu         iu;
> +    uint8_t                 viosrp_iu_buf[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
>  
>      /* SCSI request tracking */
>      SCSIRequest             *sreq;
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ typedef struct {
>  
>  static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
>  {
> -    return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
> +    return (union viosrp_iu *)req->viosrp_iu_buf;
>  }
>  
>  
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
>  
>      /* First copy the SRP */
>      rc = spapr_vio_dma_write(&s->vdev, req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr,
> -                             &req->iu, length);
> +                             &req->viosrp_iu_buf, length);
>      if (rc) {
>          fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_send_iu: DMA write failure !\n");
>      }
> @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_vscsi_req = {
>      .minimum_version_id = 1,
>      .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
>          VMSTATE_BUFFER(crq.raw, vscsi_req),
> -        VMSTATE_BUFFER(iu.srp.reserved, vscsi_req),
> +        VMSTATE_BUFFER(viosrp_iu_buf, vscsi_req),
>          VMSTATE_UINT32(qtag, vscsi_req),
>          VMSTATE_BOOL(active, vscsi_req),
>          VMSTATE_UINT32(data_len, vscsi_req),
> @@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq *crq)
>      }
>  
>      /* XXX Handle failure differently ? */
> -    if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->iu,
> +    if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->viosrp_iu_buf,
>                             crq->s.IU_length)) {
>          fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_got_payload: DMA read failure !\n");
>          vscsi_put_req(req);

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size
  2020-03-05  0:43   ` David Gibson
@ 2020-03-05  6:47     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-05  6:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Gibson; +Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini

On 3/5/20 1:43 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:11PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> The 'union srp_iu' is meant as a pointer to any SRP Information
>> Unit type, it is not related to the size of a VIO DMA buffer.
>>
>> Use a plain buffer for the VIO DMA read/write calls.
>> We can remove the reserved buffer from the 'union srp_iu'.
>>
>> This issue was noticed when replacing the zero-length arrays
>> from hw/scsi/srp.h with flexible array member,
>> 'clang -fsanitize=undefined' reported:
>>
>>    hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c:69:29: error: field 'iu' with variable sized type 'union viosrp_iu' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU extension [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
>>         union viosrp_iu         iu;
>>                                 ^
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   hw/scsi/viosrp.h      |  2 +-
>>   hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 10 +++++-----
>>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
>> index 25676c2383..aba3203028 100644
>> --- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
>> +++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
>> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ union srp_iu {
>>       struct srp_tsk_mgmt tsk_mgmt;
>>       struct srp_cmd cmd;
>>       struct srp_rsp rsp;
>> -    uint8_t reserved[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
>>   };
>> +_Static_assert(sizeof(union srp_iu) <= SRP_MAX_IU_LEN, "srp_iu size incorrect");
> 
> Hrm.  Given that srp_iu will be a variably sized type, is this
> assertion actually testing anything meaningful?

I wanted to assert that if another SRP IU is added, the DMA buffer will 
be big enough to hold it. I'll simply remove the check.

> Otherwise, LGTM.

Thanks for reviewing the series,

Phil.

> 
>>   
>>   enum viosrp_crq_formats {
>>       VIOSRP_SRP_FORMAT = 0x01,
>> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
>> index f1a0bbdc31..f9be68e44e 100644
>> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
>> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
>> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ typedef union vscsi_crq {
>>   
>>   typedef struct vscsi_req {
>>       vscsi_crq               crq;
>> -    union viosrp_iu         iu;
>> +    uint8_t                 viosrp_iu_buf[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
>>   
>>       /* SCSI request tracking */
>>       SCSIRequest             *sreq;
>> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ typedef struct {
>>   
>>   static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
>>   {
>> -    return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
>> +    return (union viosrp_iu *)req->viosrp_iu_buf;
>>   }
>>   
>>   
>> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
>>   
>>       /* First copy the SRP */
>>       rc = spapr_vio_dma_write(&s->vdev, req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr,
>> -                             &req->iu, length);
>> +                             &req->viosrp_iu_buf, length);
>>       if (rc) {
>>           fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_send_iu: DMA write failure !\n");
>>       }
>> @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_vscsi_req = {
>>       .minimum_version_id = 1,
>>       .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
>>           VMSTATE_BUFFER(crq.raw, vscsi_req),
>> -        VMSTATE_BUFFER(iu.srp.reserved, vscsi_req),
>> +        VMSTATE_BUFFER(viosrp_iu_buf, vscsi_req),
>>           VMSTATE_UINT32(qtag, vscsi_req),
>>           VMSTATE_BOOL(active, vscsi_req),
>>           VMSTATE_UINT32(data_len, vscsi_req),
>> @@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq *crq)
>>       }
>>   
>>       /* XXX Handle failure differently ? */
>> -    if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->iu,
>> +    if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->viosrp_iu_buf,
>>                              crq->s.IU_length)) {
>>           fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_got_payload: DMA read failure !\n");
>>           vscsi_put_req(req);
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit
  2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2020-03-05  0:40   ` David Gibson
@ 2020-03-05 10:21   ` Greg Kurz
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kurz @ 2020-03-05 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  Cc: Fam Zheng, Paolo Bonzini, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, David Gibson

On Wed,  4 Mar 2020 16:33:09 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:

> We already have a ui pointer, use it (to simplify the next commit).
> 

Small typo, s/ui/iu 

> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> index 7e397ed797..3cb5a38181 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> @@ -261,9 +261,9 @@ static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
>      if (status) {
>          iu->srp.rsp.sol_not = (sol_not & 0x04) >> 2;
>          if (req->senselen) {
> -            req->iu.srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
> -            req->iu.srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
> -            memcpy(req->iu.srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
> +            iu->srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
> +            iu->srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
> +            memcpy(iu->srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
>              total_len += req->senselen;
>          }
>      } else {



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-05 10:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05  0:39   ` David Gibson
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05  0:40   ` David Gibson
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05  0:40   ` David Gibson
2020-03-05 10:21   ` Greg Kurz
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05  0:41   ` David Gibson
2020-03-05  0:42     ` David Gibson
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05  0:43   ` David Gibson
2020-03-05  6:47     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).