* [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use
@ 2020-03-04 15:33 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
David Gibson
This series fixes a dangerous zero-length array use.
Simples patches first to clean the issue in the last patch:
dissociate the buffer holding DMA requests with pointer to
SRP Information Unit packets.
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (5):
hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible
array
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size
hw/scsi/viosrp.h | 4 ++-
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include
2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-04 15:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:39 ` David Gibson
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
David Gibson
This header use the srp_* structures declared in "hw/scsi/srp.h".
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
hw/scsi/viosrp.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
index d8e365db1e..25676c2383 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
+++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
#ifndef PPC_VIOSRP_H
#define PPC_VIOSRP_H
+#include "hw/scsi/srp.h"
+
#define SRP_VERSION "16.a"
#define SRP_MAX_IU_LEN 256
#define SRP_MAX_LOC_LEN 32
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array
2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-04 15:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:40 ` David Gibson
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
David Gibson
Replace sizeof() flexible arrays union srp_iu/viosrp_iu by the
SRP_MAX_IU_LEN definition, which is what this code actually meant
to use.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 7d584e7732..7e397ed797 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -671,8 +671,8 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
*/
rsp->req_lim_delta = cpu_to_be32(VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT-2);
rsp->tag = tag;
- rsp->max_it_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(sizeof(union srp_iu));
- rsp->max_ti_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(sizeof(union srp_iu));
+ rsp->max_it_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(SRP_MAX_IU_LEN);
+ rsp->max_ti_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(SRP_MAX_IU_LEN);
/* direct and indirect */
rsp->buf_fmt = cpu_to_be16(SRP_BUF_FORMAT_DIRECT | SRP_BUF_FORMAT_INDIRECT);
@@ -1088,7 +1088,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq *crq)
* in our 256 bytes IUs. If not we'll have to increase the size
* of the structure.
*/
- if (crq->s.IU_length > sizeof(union viosrp_iu)) {
+ if (crq->s.IU_length > SRP_MAX_IU_LEN) {
fprintf(stderr, "VSCSI: SRP IU too long (%d bytes) !\n",
crq->s.IU_length);
vscsi_put_req(req);
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit
2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-04 15:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:40 ` David Gibson
2020-03-05 10:21 ` Greg Kurz
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
4 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
David Gibson
We already have a ui pointer, use it (to simplify the next commit).
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 7e397ed797..3cb5a38181 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -261,9 +261,9 @@ static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
if (status) {
iu->srp.rsp.sol_not = (sol_not & 0x04) >> 2;
if (req->senselen) {
- req->iu.srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
- req->iu.srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
- memcpy(req->iu.srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
+ iu->srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
+ iu->srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
+ memcpy(iu->srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
total_len += req->senselen;
}
} else {
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper
2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-04 15:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:41 ` David Gibson
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
David Gibson
Introduce the req_ui() helper which returns a pointer to
the viosrp_iu union held in the vscsi_req structure.
This simplifies the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 3cb5a38181..f1a0bbdc31 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ typedef struct {
vscsi_req reqs[VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT];
} VSCSIState;
+static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
+{
+ return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
+}
+
+
static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_get_req(VSCSIState *s)
{
vscsi_req *req;
@@ -121,7 +127,7 @@ static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_find_req(VSCSIState *s, uint64_t srp_tag)
for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
req = &s->reqs[i];
- if (req->iu.srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
+ if (req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
return req;
}
}
@@ -188,7 +194,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
req->crq.s.reserved = 0x00;
req->crq.s.timeout = cpu_to_be16(0x0000);
req->crq.s.IU_length = cpu_to_be16(length);
- req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req->iu.srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
+ req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req_iu(req)->srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
if (rc == 0) {
req->crq.s.status = VIOSRP_OK;
@@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ static void vscsi_makeup_sense(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
uint8_t status, int32_t res_in, int32_t res_out)
{
- union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
+ union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
int total_len = sizeof(iu->srp.rsp);
uint8_t sol_not = iu->srp.cmd.sol_not;
@@ -285,7 +291,7 @@ static int vscsi_fetch_desc(VSCSIState *s, struct vscsi_req *req,
unsigned n, unsigned buf_offset,
struct srp_direct_buf *ret)
{
- struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
+ struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
switch (req->dma_fmt) {
case SRP_NO_DATA_DESC: {
@@ -473,7 +479,7 @@ static int data_out_desc_size(struct srp_cmd *cmd)
static int vscsi_preprocess_desc(vscsi_req *req)
{
- struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
+ struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
req->cdb_offset = cmd->add_cdb_len & ~3;
@@ -655,7 +661,7 @@ static void *vscsi_load_request(QEMUFile *f, SCSIRequest *sreq)
static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
- union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
+ union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
struct srp_login_rsp *rsp = &iu->srp.login_rsp;
uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
@@ -681,7 +687,7 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
static void vscsi_inquiry_no_target(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
- uint8_t *cdb = req->iu.srp.cmd.cdb;
+ uint8_t *cdb = req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.cdb;
uint8_t resp_data[36];
int rc, len, alen;
@@ -770,7 +776,7 @@ static void vscsi_report_luns(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
- union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
+ union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
SCSIDevice *sdev;
int n, lun;
@@ -821,7 +827,7 @@ static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
- union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
+ union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
vscsi_req *tmpreq;
int i, lun = 0, resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_COMPLETE;
SCSIDevice *d;
@@ -831,7 +837,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt %02x\n",
iu->srp.tsk_mgmt.tsk_mgmt_func);
- d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus, be64_to_cpu(req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
+ d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus,
+ be64_to_cpu(req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
if (!d) {
resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
} else {
@@ -842,7 +849,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
break;
}
- tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
+ tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
if (tmpreq && tmpreq->sreq) {
assert(tmpreq->sreq->hba_private);
scsi_req_cancel(tmpreq->sreq);
@@ -867,7 +874,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
tmpreq = &s->reqs[i];
- if (tmpreq->iu.srp.cmd.lun != req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
+ if (req_iu(tmpreq)->srp.cmd.lun
+ != req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
continue;
}
if (!tmpreq->active || !tmpreq->sreq) {
@@ -911,7 +919,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
static int vscsi_handle_srp_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
- union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
+ union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
int done = 1;
uint8_t opcode = srp->rsp.opcode;
@@ -948,7 +956,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_adapter_info(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
struct mad_adapter_info_data info;
int rc;
- sinfo = &req->iu.mad.adapter_info;
+ sinfo = &req_iu(req)->mad.adapter_info;
#if 0 /* What for ? */
rc = spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, be64_to_cpu(sinfo->buffer),
@@ -984,7 +992,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
uint64_t buffer;
int rc;
- vcap = &req->iu.mad.capabilities;
+ vcap = &req_iu(req)->mad.capabilities;
req_len = len = be16_to_cpu(vcap->common.length);
buffer = be64_to_cpu(vcap->buffer);
if (len > sizeof(cap)) {
@@ -1029,7 +1037,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
static int vscsi_handle_mad_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
- union mad_iu *mad = &req->iu.mad;
+ union mad_iu *mad = &req_iu(req)->mad;
bool request_handled = false;
uint64_t retlen = 0;
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size
2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-04 15:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:43 ` David Gibson
4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-04 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
David Gibson
The 'union srp_iu' is meant as a pointer to any SRP Information
Unit type, it is not related to the size of a VIO DMA buffer.
Use a plain buffer for the VIO DMA read/write calls.
We can remove the reserved buffer from the 'union srp_iu'.
This issue was noticed when replacing the zero-length arrays
from hw/scsi/srp.h with flexible array member,
'clang -fsanitize=undefined' reported:
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c:69:29: error: field 'iu' with variable sized type 'union viosrp_iu' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU extension [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
union viosrp_iu iu;
^
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
hw/scsi/viosrp.h | 2 +-
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
index 25676c2383..aba3203028 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
+++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ union srp_iu {
struct srp_tsk_mgmt tsk_mgmt;
struct srp_cmd cmd;
struct srp_rsp rsp;
- uint8_t reserved[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
};
+_Static_assert(sizeof(union srp_iu) <= SRP_MAX_IU_LEN, "srp_iu size incorrect");
enum viosrp_crq_formats {
VIOSRP_SRP_FORMAT = 0x01,
diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index f1a0bbdc31..f9be68e44e 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ typedef union vscsi_crq {
typedef struct vscsi_req {
vscsi_crq crq;
- union viosrp_iu iu;
+ uint8_t viosrp_iu_buf[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
/* SCSI request tracking */
SCSIRequest *sreq;
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ typedef struct {
static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
{
- return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
+ return (union viosrp_iu *)req->viosrp_iu_buf;
}
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
/* First copy the SRP */
rc = spapr_vio_dma_write(&s->vdev, req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr,
- &req->iu, length);
+ &req->viosrp_iu_buf, length);
if (rc) {
fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_send_iu: DMA write failure !\n");
}
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_vscsi_req = {
.minimum_version_id = 1,
.fields = (VMStateField[]) {
VMSTATE_BUFFER(crq.raw, vscsi_req),
- VMSTATE_BUFFER(iu.srp.reserved, vscsi_req),
+ VMSTATE_BUFFER(viosrp_iu_buf, vscsi_req),
VMSTATE_UINT32(qtag, vscsi_req),
VMSTATE_BOOL(active, vscsi_req),
VMSTATE_UINT32(data_len, vscsi_req),
@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq *crq)
}
/* XXX Handle failure differently ? */
- if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->iu,
+ if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->viosrp_iu_buf,
crq->s.IU_length)) {
fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_got_payload: DMA read failure !\n");
vscsi_put_req(req);
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05 0:39 ` David Gibson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2020-03-05 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 856 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:07PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> This header use the srp_* structures declared in "hw/scsi/srp.h".
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Applied to ppc-for-5.0.
> ---
> hw/scsi/viosrp.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
> index d8e365db1e..25676c2383 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
> +++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
> #ifndef PPC_VIOSRP_H
> #define PPC_VIOSRP_H
>
> +#include "hw/scsi/srp.h"
> +
> #define SRP_VERSION "16.a"
> #define SRP_MAX_IU_LEN 256
> #define SRP_MAX_LOC_LEN 32
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05 0:40 ` David Gibson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2020-03-05 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1768 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:08PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Replace sizeof() flexible arrays union srp_iu/viosrp_iu by the
> SRP_MAX_IU_LEN definition, which is what this code actually meant
> to use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Applied to ppc-for-5.0
> ---
> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> index 7d584e7732..7e397ed797 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> @@ -671,8 +671,8 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> */
> rsp->req_lim_delta = cpu_to_be32(VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT-2);
> rsp->tag = tag;
> - rsp->max_it_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(sizeof(union srp_iu));
> - rsp->max_ti_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(sizeof(union srp_iu));
> + rsp->max_it_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(SRP_MAX_IU_LEN);
> + rsp->max_ti_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(SRP_MAX_IU_LEN);
> /* direct and indirect */
> rsp->buf_fmt = cpu_to_be16(SRP_BUF_FORMAT_DIRECT | SRP_BUF_FORMAT_INDIRECT);
>
> @@ -1088,7 +1088,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq *crq)
> * in our 256 bytes IUs. If not we'll have to increase the size
> * of the structure.
> */
> - if (crq->s.IU_length > sizeof(union viosrp_iu)) {
> + if (crq->s.IU_length > SRP_MAX_IU_LEN) {
> fprintf(stderr, "VSCSI: SRP IU too long (%d bytes) !\n",
> crq->s.IU_length);
> vscsi_put_req(req);
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05 0:40 ` David Gibson
2020-03-05 10:21 ` Greg Kurz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2020-03-05 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1380 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:09PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> We already have a ui pointer, use it (to simplify the next commit).
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Applied to ppc-for-5.0.
> ---
> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> index 7e397ed797..3cb5a38181 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> @@ -261,9 +261,9 @@ static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> if (status) {
> iu->srp.rsp.sol_not = (sol_not & 0x04) >> 2;
> if (req->senselen) {
> - req->iu.srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
> - req->iu.srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
> - memcpy(req->iu.srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
> + iu->srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
> + iu->srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
> + memcpy(iu->srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
> total_len += req->senselen;
> }
> } else {
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05 0:41 ` David Gibson
2020-03-05 0:42 ` David Gibson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2020-03-05 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7279 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:10PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Introduce the req_ui() helper which returns a pointer to
> the viosrp_iu union held in the vscsi_req structure.
> This simplifies the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> index 3cb5a38181..f1a0bbdc31 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ typedef struct {
> vscsi_req reqs[VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT];
> } VSCSIState;
>
> +static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
> +{
> + return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
I guess it doesn't really matter since you remove it in the next
patch, but this seems a really weird way of expressing
return &req->iu;
> +}
> +
> +
> static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_get_req(VSCSIState *s)
> {
> vscsi_req *req;
> @@ -121,7 +127,7 @@ static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_find_req(VSCSIState *s, uint64_t srp_tag)
>
> for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
> req = &s->reqs[i];
> - if (req->iu.srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
> + if (req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
> return req;
> }
> }
> @@ -188,7 +194,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> req->crq.s.reserved = 0x00;
> req->crq.s.timeout = cpu_to_be16(0x0000);
> req->crq.s.IU_length = cpu_to_be16(length);
> - req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req->iu.srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
> + req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req_iu(req)->srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
>
> if (rc == 0) {
> req->crq.s.status = VIOSRP_OK;
> @@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ static void vscsi_makeup_sense(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> uint8_t status, int32_t res_in, int32_t res_out)
> {
> - union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> + union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
> int total_len = sizeof(iu->srp.rsp);
> uint8_t sol_not = iu->srp.cmd.sol_not;
> @@ -285,7 +291,7 @@ static int vscsi_fetch_desc(VSCSIState *s, struct vscsi_req *req,
> unsigned n, unsigned buf_offset,
> struct srp_direct_buf *ret)
> {
> - struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
> + struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
>
> switch (req->dma_fmt) {
> case SRP_NO_DATA_DESC: {
> @@ -473,7 +479,7 @@ static int data_out_desc_size(struct srp_cmd *cmd)
>
> static int vscsi_preprocess_desc(vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
> + struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
>
> req->cdb_offset = cmd->add_cdb_len & ~3;
>
> @@ -655,7 +661,7 @@ static void *vscsi_load_request(QEMUFile *f, SCSIRequest *sreq)
>
> static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> + union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> struct srp_login_rsp *rsp = &iu->srp.login_rsp;
> uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
>
> @@ -681,7 +687,7 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>
> static void vscsi_inquiry_no_target(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - uint8_t *cdb = req->iu.srp.cmd.cdb;
> + uint8_t *cdb = req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.cdb;
> uint8_t resp_data[36];
> int rc, len, alen;
>
> @@ -770,7 +776,7 @@ static void vscsi_report_luns(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>
> static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
> + union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
> SCSIDevice *sdev;
> int n, lun;
>
> @@ -821,7 +827,7 @@ static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>
> static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> + union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> vscsi_req *tmpreq;
> int i, lun = 0, resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_COMPLETE;
> SCSIDevice *d;
> @@ -831,7 +837,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt %02x\n",
> iu->srp.tsk_mgmt.tsk_mgmt_func);
>
> - d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus, be64_to_cpu(req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
> + d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus,
> + be64_to_cpu(req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
> if (!d) {
> resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
> } else {
> @@ -842,7 +849,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> break;
> }
>
> - tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
> + tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
> if (tmpreq && tmpreq->sreq) {
> assert(tmpreq->sreq->hba_private);
> scsi_req_cancel(tmpreq->sreq);
> @@ -867,7 +874,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>
> for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
> tmpreq = &s->reqs[i];
> - if (tmpreq->iu.srp.cmd.lun != req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
> + if (req_iu(tmpreq)->srp.cmd.lun
> + != req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
> continue;
> }
> if (!tmpreq->active || !tmpreq->sreq) {
> @@ -911,7 +919,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>
> static int vscsi_handle_srp_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
> + union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
> int done = 1;
> uint8_t opcode = srp->rsp.opcode;
>
> @@ -948,7 +956,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_adapter_info(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> struct mad_adapter_info_data info;
> int rc;
>
> - sinfo = &req->iu.mad.adapter_info;
> + sinfo = &req_iu(req)->mad.adapter_info;
>
> #if 0 /* What for ? */
> rc = spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, be64_to_cpu(sinfo->buffer),
> @@ -984,7 +992,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> uint64_t buffer;
> int rc;
>
> - vcap = &req->iu.mad.capabilities;
> + vcap = &req_iu(req)->mad.capabilities;
> req_len = len = be16_to_cpu(vcap->common.length);
> buffer = be64_to_cpu(vcap->buffer);
> if (len > sizeof(cap)) {
> @@ -1029,7 +1037,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>
> static int vscsi_handle_mad_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - union mad_iu *mad = &req->iu.mad;
> + union mad_iu *mad = &req_iu(req)->mad;
> bool request_handled = false;
> uint64_t retlen = 0;
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper
2020-03-05 0:41 ` David Gibson
@ 2020-03-05 0:42 ` David Gibson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2020-03-05 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7761 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 11:41:37AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:10PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Introduce the req_ui() helper which returns a pointer to
> > the viosrp_iu union held in the vscsi_req structure.
> > This simplifies the next patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> > index 3cb5a38181..f1a0bbdc31 100644
> > --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> > +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> > @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ typedef struct {
> > vscsi_req reqs[VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT];
> > } VSCSIState;
> >
> > +static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
> > +{
> > + return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
>
> I guess it doesn't really matter since you remove it in the next
> patch, but this seems a really weird way of expressing
> return &req->iu;
Oh, also s/req_ui/req_iu/g in the commit message.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_get_req(VSCSIState *s)
> > {
> > vscsi_req *req;
> > @@ -121,7 +127,7 @@ static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_find_req(VSCSIState *s, uint64_t srp_tag)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
> > req = &s->reqs[i];
> > - if (req->iu.srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
> > + if (req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
> > return req;
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -188,7 +194,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> > req->crq.s.reserved = 0x00;
> > req->crq.s.timeout = cpu_to_be16(0x0000);
> > req->crq.s.IU_length = cpu_to_be16(length);
> > - req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req->iu.srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
> > + req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req_iu(req)->srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
> >
> > if (rc == 0) {
> > req->crq.s.status = VIOSRP_OK;
> > @@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ static void vscsi_makeup_sense(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> > static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> > uint8_t status, int32_t res_in, int32_t res_out)
> > {
> > - union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> > + union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> > uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
> > int total_len = sizeof(iu->srp.rsp);
> > uint8_t sol_not = iu->srp.cmd.sol_not;
> > @@ -285,7 +291,7 @@ static int vscsi_fetch_desc(VSCSIState *s, struct vscsi_req *req,
> > unsigned n, unsigned buf_offset,
> > struct srp_direct_buf *ret)
> > {
> > - struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
> > + struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
> >
> > switch (req->dma_fmt) {
> > case SRP_NO_DATA_DESC: {
> > @@ -473,7 +479,7 @@ static int data_out_desc_size(struct srp_cmd *cmd)
> >
> > static int vscsi_preprocess_desc(vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
> > + struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
> >
> > req->cdb_offset = cmd->add_cdb_len & ~3;
> >
> > @@ -655,7 +661,7 @@ static void *vscsi_load_request(QEMUFile *f, SCSIRequest *sreq)
> >
> > static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> > + union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> > struct srp_login_rsp *rsp = &iu->srp.login_rsp;
> > uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
> >
> > @@ -681,7 +687,7 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >
> > static void vscsi_inquiry_no_target(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - uint8_t *cdb = req->iu.srp.cmd.cdb;
> > + uint8_t *cdb = req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.cdb;
> > uint8_t resp_data[36];
> > int rc, len, alen;
> >
> > @@ -770,7 +776,7 @@ static void vscsi_report_luns(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >
> > static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
> > + union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
> > SCSIDevice *sdev;
> > int n, lun;
> >
> > @@ -821,7 +827,7 @@ static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >
> > static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> > + union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> > vscsi_req *tmpreq;
> > int i, lun = 0, resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_COMPLETE;
> > SCSIDevice *d;
> > @@ -831,7 +837,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt %02x\n",
> > iu->srp.tsk_mgmt.tsk_mgmt_func);
> >
> > - d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus, be64_to_cpu(req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
> > + d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus,
> > + be64_to_cpu(req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
> > if (!d) {
> > resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
> > } else {
> > @@ -842,7 +849,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > - tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
> > + tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
> > if (tmpreq && tmpreq->sreq) {
> > assert(tmpreq->sreq->hba_private);
> > scsi_req_cancel(tmpreq->sreq);
> > @@ -867,7 +874,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
> > tmpreq = &s->reqs[i];
> > - if (tmpreq->iu.srp.cmd.lun != req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
> > + if (req_iu(tmpreq)->srp.cmd.lun
> > + != req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
> > continue;
> > }
> > if (!tmpreq->active || !tmpreq->sreq) {
> > @@ -911,7 +919,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >
> > static int vscsi_handle_srp_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
> > + union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
> > int done = 1;
> > uint8_t opcode = srp->rsp.opcode;
> >
> > @@ -948,7 +956,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_adapter_info(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > struct mad_adapter_info_data info;
> > int rc;
> >
> > - sinfo = &req->iu.mad.adapter_info;
> > + sinfo = &req_iu(req)->mad.adapter_info;
> >
> > #if 0 /* What for ? */
> > rc = spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, be64_to_cpu(sinfo->buffer),
> > @@ -984,7 +992,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > uint64_t buffer;
> > int rc;
> >
> > - vcap = &req->iu.mad.capabilities;
> > + vcap = &req_iu(req)->mad.capabilities;
> > req_len = len = be16_to_cpu(vcap->common.length);
> > buffer = be64_to_cpu(vcap->buffer);
> > if (len > sizeof(cap)) {
> > @@ -1029,7 +1037,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> >
> > static int vscsi_handle_mad_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - union mad_iu *mad = &req->iu.mad;
> > + union mad_iu *mad = &req_iu(req)->mad;
> > bool request_handled = false;
> > uint64_t retlen = 0;
> >
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05 0:43 ` David Gibson
2020-03-05 6:47 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2020-03-05 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3769 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:11PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The 'union srp_iu' is meant as a pointer to any SRP Information
> Unit type, it is not related to the size of a VIO DMA buffer.
>
> Use a plain buffer for the VIO DMA read/write calls.
> We can remove the reserved buffer from the 'union srp_iu'.
>
> This issue was noticed when replacing the zero-length arrays
> from hw/scsi/srp.h with flexible array member,
> 'clang -fsanitize=undefined' reported:
>
> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c:69:29: error: field 'iu' with variable sized type 'union viosrp_iu' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU extension [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
> union viosrp_iu iu;
> ^
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/scsi/viosrp.h | 2 +-
> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
> index 25676c2383..aba3203028 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
> +++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ union srp_iu {
> struct srp_tsk_mgmt tsk_mgmt;
> struct srp_cmd cmd;
> struct srp_rsp rsp;
> - uint8_t reserved[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
> };
> +_Static_assert(sizeof(union srp_iu) <= SRP_MAX_IU_LEN, "srp_iu size incorrect");
Hrm. Given that srp_iu will be a variably sized type, is this
assertion actually testing anything meaningful?
Otherwise, LGTM.
>
> enum viosrp_crq_formats {
> VIOSRP_SRP_FORMAT = 0x01,
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> index f1a0bbdc31..f9be68e44e 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ typedef union vscsi_crq {
>
> typedef struct vscsi_req {
> vscsi_crq crq;
> - union viosrp_iu iu;
> + uint8_t viosrp_iu_buf[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
>
> /* SCSI request tracking */
> SCSIRequest *sreq;
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ typedef struct {
>
> static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
> + return (union viosrp_iu *)req->viosrp_iu_buf;
> }
>
>
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
>
> /* First copy the SRP */
> rc = spapr_vio_dma_write(&s->vdev, req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr,
> - &req->iu, length);
> + &req->viosrp_iu_buf, length);
> if (rc) {
> fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_send_iu: DMA write failure !\n");
> }
> @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_vscsi_req = {
> .minimum_version_id = 1,
> .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> VMSTATE_BUFFER(crq.raw, vscsi_req),
> - VMSTATE_BUFFER(iu.srp.reserved, vscsi_req),
> + VMSTATE_BUFFER(viosrp_iu_buf, vscsi_req),
> VMSTATE_UINT32(qtag, vscsi_req),
> VMSTATE_BOOL(active, vscsi_req),
> VMSTATE_UINT32(data_len, vscsi_req),
> @@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq *crq)
> }
>
> /* XXX Handle failure differently ? */
> - if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->iu,
> + if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->viosrp_iu_buf,
> crq->s.IU_length)) {
> fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_got_payload: DMA read failure !\n");
> vscsi_put_req(req);
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size
2020-03-05 0:43 ` David Gibson
@ 2020-03-05 6:47 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-05 6:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Gibson; +Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, Paolo Bonzini
On 3/5/20 1:43 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:11PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> The 'union srp_iu' is meant as a pointer to any SRP Information
>> Unit type, it is not related to the size of a VIO DMA buffer.
>>
>> Use a plain buffer for the VIO DMA read/write calls.
>> We can remove the reserved buffer from the 'union srp_iu'.
>>
>> This issue was noticed when replacing the zero-length arrays
>> from hw/scsi/srp.h with flexible array member,
>> 'clang -fsanitize=undefined' reported:
>>
>> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c:69:29: error: field 'iu' with variable sized type 'union viosrp_iu' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU extension [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
>> union viosrp_iu iu;
>> ^
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/scsi/viosrp.h | 2 +-
>> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
>> index 25676c2383..aba3203028 100644
>> --- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
>> +++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
>> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ union srp_iu {
>> struct srp_tsk_mgmt tsk_mgmt;
>> struct srp_cmd cmd;
>> struct srp_rsp rsp;
>> - uint8_t reserved[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
>> };
>> +_Static_assert(sizeof(union srp_iu) <= SRP_MAX_IU_LEN, "srp_iu size incorrect");
>
> Hrm. Given that srp_iu will be a variably sized type, is this
> assertion actually testing anything meaningful?
I wanted to assert that if another SRP IU is added, the DMA buffer will
be big enough to hold it. I'll simply remove the check.
> Otherwise, LGTM.
Thanks for reviewing the series,
Phil.
>
>>
>> enum viosrp_crq_formats {
>> VIOSRP_SRP_FORMAT = 0x01,
>> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
>> index f1a0bbdc31..f9be68e44e 100644
>> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
>> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
>> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ typedef union vscsi_crq {
>>
>> typedef struct vscsi_req {
>> vscsi_crq crq;
>> - union viosrp_iu iu;
>> + uint8_t viosrp_iu_buf[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
>>
>> /* SCSI request tracking */
>> SCSIRequest *sreq;
>> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ typedef struct {
>>
>> static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
>> {
>> - return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
>> + return (union viosrp_iu *)req->viosrp_iu_buf;
>> }
>>
>>
>> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
>>
>> /* First copy the SRP */
>> rc = spapr_vio_dma_write(&s->vdev, req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr,
>> - &req->iu, length);
>> + &req->viosrp_iu_buf, length);
>> if (rc) {
>> fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_send_iu: DMA write failure !\n");
>> }
>> @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_vscsi_req = {
>> .minimum_version_id = 1,
>> .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
>> VMSTATE_BUFFER(crq.raw, vscsi_req),
>> - VMSTATE_BUFFER(iu.srp.reserved, vscsi_req),
>> + VMSTATE_BUFFER(viosrp_iu_buf, vscsi_req),
>> VMSTATE_UINT32(qtag, vscsi_req),
>> VMSTATE_BOOL(active, vscsi_req),
>> VMSTATE_UINT32(data_len, vscsi_req),
>> @@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq *crq)
>> }
>>
>> /* XXX Handle failure differently ? */
>> - if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->iu,
>> + if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->viosrp_iu_buf,
>> crq->s.IU_length)) {
>> fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_got_payload: DMA read failure !\n");
>> vscsi_put_req(req);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:40 ` David Gibson
@ 2020-03-05 10:21 ` Greg Kurz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kurz @ 2020-03-05 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Cc: Fam Zheng, Paolo Bonzini, qemu-ppc, qemu-devel, David Gibson
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:33:09 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> We already have a ui pointer, use it (to simplify the next commit).
>
Small typo, s/ui/iu
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> index 7e397ed797..3cb5a38181 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> @@ -261,9 +261,9 @@ static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> if (status) {
> iu->srp.rsp.sol_not = (sol_not & 0x04) >> 2;
> if (req->senselen) {
> - req->iu.srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
> - req->iu.srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
> - memcpy(req->iu.srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
> + iu->srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
> + iu->srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
> + memcpy(iu->srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
> total_len += req->senselen;
> }
> } else {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-05 10:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:39 ` David Gibson
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:40 ` David Gibson
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:40 ` David Gibson
2020-03-05 10:21 ` Greg Kurz
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:41 ` David Gibson
2020-03-05 0:42 ` David Gibson
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:43 ` David Gibson
2020-03-05 6:47 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).