From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:41:37 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200305004137.GJ593957@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304153311.22959-5-philmd@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7279 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:10PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Introduce the req_ui() helper which returns a pointer to
> the viosrp_iu union held in the vscsi_req structure.
> This simplifies the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> index 3cb5a38181..f1a0bbdc31 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ typedef struct {
> vscsi_req reqs[VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT];
> } VSCSIState;
>
> +static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
> +{
> + return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
I guess it doesn't really matter since you remove it in the next
patch, but this seems a really weird way of expressing
return &req->iu;
> +}
> +
> +
> static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_get_req(VSCSIState *s)
> {
> vscsi_req *req;
> @@ -121,7 +127,7 @@ static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_find_req(VSCSIState *s, uint64_t srp_tag)
>
> for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
> req = &s->reqs[i];
> - if (req->iu.srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
> + if (req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
> return req;
> }
> }
> @@ -188,7 +194,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> req->crq.s.reserved = 0x00;
> req->crq.s.timeout = cpu_to_be16(0x0000);
> req->crq.s.IU_length = cpu_to_be16(length);
> - req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req->iu.srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
> + req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req_iu(req)->srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
>
> if (rc == 0) {
> req->crq.s.status = VIOSRP_OK;
> @@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ static void vscsi_makeup_sense(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> uint8_t status, int32_t res_in, int32_t res_out)
> {
> - union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> + union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
> int total_len = sizeof(iu->srp.rsp);
> uint8_t sol_not = iu->srp.cmd.sol_not;
> @@ -285,7 +291,7 @@ static int vscsi_fetch_desc(VSCSIState *s, struct vscsi_req *req,
> unsigned n, unsigned buf_offset,
> struct srp_direct_buf *ret)
> {
> - struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
> + struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
>
> switch (req->dma_fmt) {
> case SRP_NO_DATA_DESC: {
> @@ -473,7 +479,7 @@ static int data_out_desc_size(struct srp_cmd *cmd)
>
> static int vscsi_preprocess_desc(vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
> + struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
>
> req->cdb_offset = cmd->add_cdb_len & ~3;
>
> @@ -655,7 +661,7 @@ static void *vscsi_load_request(QEMUFile *f, SCSIRequest *sreq)
>
> static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> + union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> struct srp_login_rsp *rsp = &iu->srp.login_rsp;
> uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
>
> @@ -681,7 +687,7 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>
> static void vscsi_inquiry_no_target(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - uint8_t *cdb = req->iu.srp.cmd.cdb;
> + uint8_t *cdb = req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.cdb;
> uint8_t resp_data[36];
> int rc, len, alen;
>
> @@ -770,7 +776,7 @@ static void vscsi_report_luns(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>
> static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
> + union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
> SCSIDevice *sdev;
> int n, lun;
>
> @@ -821,7 +827,7 @@ static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>
> static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> + union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> vscsi_req *tmpreq;
> int i, lun = 0, resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_COMPLETE;
> SCSIDevice *d;
> @@ -831,7 +837,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt %02x\n",
> iu->srp.tsk_mgmt.tsk_mgmt_func);
>
> - d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus, be64_to_cpu(req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
> + d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus,
> + be64_to_cpu(req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
> if (!d) {
> resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
> } else {
> @@ -842,7 +849,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> break;
> }
>
> - tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
> + tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
> if (tmpreq && tmpreq->sreq) {
> assert(tmpreq->sreq->hba_private);
> scsi_req_cancel(tmpreq->sreq);
> @@ -867,7 +874,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>
> for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
> tmpreq = &s->reqs[i];
> - if (tmpreq->iu.srp.cmd.lun != req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
> + if (req_iu(tmpreq)->srp.cmd.lun
> + != req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
> continue;
> }
> if (!tmpreq->active || !tmpreq->sreq) {
> @@ -911,7 +919,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>
> static int vscsi_handle_srp_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
> + union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
> int done = 1;
> uint8_t opcode = srp->rsp.opcode;
>
> @@ -948,7 +956,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_adapter_info(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> struct mad_adapter_info_data info;
> int rc;
>
> - sinfo = &req->iu.mad.adapter_info;
> + sinfo = &req_iu(req)->mad.adapter_info;
>
> #if 0 /* What for ? */
> rc = spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, be64_to_cpu(sinfo->buffer),
> @@ -984,7 +992,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> uint64_t buffer;
> int rc;
>
> - vcap = &req->iu.mad.capabilities;
> + vcap = &req_iu(req)->mad.capabilities;
> req_len = len = be16_to_cpu(vcap->common.length);
> buffer = be64_to_cpu(vcap->buffer);
> if (len > sizeof(cap)) {
> @@ -1029,7 +1037,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>
> static int vscsi_handle_mad_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> {
> - union mad_iu *mad = &req->iu.mad;
> + union mad_iu *mad = &req_iu(req)->mad;
> bool request_handled = false;
> uint64_t retlen = 0;
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-04 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:39 ` David Gibson
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:40 ` David Gibson
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:40 ` David Gibson
2020-03-05 10:21 ` Greg Kurz
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:41 ` David Gibson [this message]
2020-03-05 0:42 ` David Gibson
2020-03-04 15:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 0:43 ` David Gibson
2020-03-05 6:47 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200305004137.GJ593957@umbus.fritz.box \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).