* [PATCH v2 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use
@ 2020-03-05 8:31 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [MERGED PATCH v2 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-05 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
David Gibson
This series fixes a dangerous zero-length array use.
Simples patches first to clean the issue in the last patch:
dissociate the buffer holding DMA requests with pointer to
SRP Information Unit packets.
v2: Addressed David Gibson review comments
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (5):
hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible
array
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_iu() helper
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size
hw/scsi/viosrp.h | 3 ++-
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [MERGED PATCH v2 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include
2020-03-05 8:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05 8:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [MERGED PATCH v2 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-05 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
David Gibson
This header use the srp_* structures declared in "hw/scsi/srp.h".
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
Patch already applied to ppc-for-5.0.
hw/scsi/viosrp.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
index d8e365db1e..25676c2383 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
+++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
#ifndef PPC_VIOSRP_H
#define PPC_VIOSRP_H
+#include "hw/scsi/srp.h"
+
#define SRP_VERSION "16.a"
#define SRP_MAX_IU_LEN 256
#define SRP_MAX_LOC_LEN 32
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [MERGED PATCH v2 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array
2020-03-05 8:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [MERGED PATCH v2 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05 8:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [MERGED PATCH v2 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-05 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
David Gibson
Replace sizeof() flexible arrays union srp_iu/viosrp_iu by the
SRP_MAX_IU_LEN definition, which is what this code actually meant
to use.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
Patch already applied to ppc-for-5.0.
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 7d584e7732..7e397ed797 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -671,8 +671,8 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
*/
rsp->req_lim_delta = cpu_to_be32(VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT-2);
rsp->tag = tag;
- rsp->max_it_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(sizeof(union srp_iu));
- rsp->max_ti_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(sizeof(union srp_iu));
+ rsp->max_it_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(SRP_MAX_IU_LEN);
+ rsp->max_ti_iu_len = cpu_to_be32(SRP_MAX_IU_LEN);
/* direct and indirect */
rsp->buf_fmt = cpu_to_be16(SRP_BUF_FORMAT_DIRECT | SRP_BUF_FORMAT_INDIRECT);
@@ -1088,7 +1088,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq *crq)
* in our 256 bytes IUs. If not we'll have to increase the size
* of the structure.
*/
- if (crq->s.IU_length > sizeof(union viosrp_iu)) {
+ if (crq->s.IU_length > SRP_MAX_IU_LEN) {
fprintf(stderr, "VSCSI: SRP IU too long (%d bytes) !\n",
crq->s.IU_length);
vscsi_put_req(req);
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [MERGED PATCH v2 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit
2020-03-05 8:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [MERGED PATCH v2 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [MERGED PATCH v2 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05 8:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_iu() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-05 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
David Gibson
We already have a ui pointer, use it (to simplify the next commit).
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
Patch already applied to ppc-for-5.0.
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 7e397ed797..3cb5a38181 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -261,9 +261,9 @@ static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
if (status) {
iu->srp.rsp.sol_not = (sol_not & 0x04) >> 2;
if (req->senselen) {
- req->iu.srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
- req->iu.srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
- memcpy(req->iu.srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
+ iu->srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID;
+ iu->srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(req->senselen);
+ memcpy(iu->srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
total_len += req->senselen;
}
} else {
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_iu() helper
2020-03-05 8:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [MERGED PATCH v2 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05 8:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 10:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Paolo Bonzini
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-05 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
David Gibson
Introduce the req_iu() helper which returns a pointer to
the viosrp_iu union held in the vscsi_req structure.
This simplifies the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
v2: Simplify req_iu, rename 'ui -> iu' in commit description (dgibson)
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 3cb5a38181..70547f98ac 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -97,6 +97,11 @@ typedef struct {
vscsi_req reqs[VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT];
} VSCSIState;
+static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
+{
+ return &req->iu;
+}
+
static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_get_req(VSCSIState *s)
{
vscsi_req *req;
@@ -121,7 +126,7 @@ static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_find_req(VSCSIState *s, uint64_t srp_tag)
for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
req = &s->reqs[i];
- if (req->iu.srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
+ if (req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
return req;
}
}
@@ -188,7 +193,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
req->crq.s.reserved = 0x00;
req->crq.s.timeout = cpu_to_be16(0x0000);
req->crq.s.IU_length = cpu_to_be16(length);
- req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req->iu.srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
+ req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req_iu(req)->srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
if (rc == 0) {
req->crq.s.status = VIOSRP_OK;
@@ -224,7 +229,7 @@ static void vscsi_makeup_sense(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
uint8_t status, int32_t res_in, int32_t res_out)
{
- union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
+ union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
int total_len = sizeof(iu->srp.rsp);
uint8_t sol_not = iu->srp.cmd.sol_not;
@@ -285,7 +290,7 @@ static int vscsi_fetch_desc(VSCSIState *s, struct vscsi_req *req,
unsigned n, unsigned buf_offset,
struct srp_direct_buf *ret)
{
- struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
+ struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
switch (req->dma_fmt) {
case SRP_NO_DATA_DESC: {
@@ -473,7 +478,7 @@ static int data_out_desc_size(struct srp_cmd *cmd)
static int vscsi_preprocess_desc(vscsi_req *req)
{
- struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
+ struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
req->cdb_offset = cmd->add_cdb_len & ~3;
@@ -655,7 +660,7 @@ static void *vscsi_load_request(QEMUFile *f, SCSIRequest *sreq)
static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
- union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
+ union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
struct srp_login_rsp *rsp = &iu->srp.login_rsp;
uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
@@ -681,7 +686,7 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
static void vscsi_inquiry_no_target(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
- uint8_t *cdb = req->iu.srp.cmd.cdb;
+ uint8_t *cdb = req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.cdb;
uint8_t resp_data[36];
int rc, len, alen;
@@ -770,7 +775,7 @@ static void vscsi_report_luns(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
- union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
+ union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
SCSIDevice *sdev;
int n, lun;
@@ -821,7 +826,7 @@ static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
- union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
+ union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
vscsi_req *tmpreq;
int i, lun = 0, resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_COMPLETE;
SCSIDevice *d;
@@ -831,7 +836,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt %02x\n",
iu->srp.tsk_mgmt.tsk_mgmt_func);
- d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus, be64_to_cpu(req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
+ d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus,
+ be64_to_cpu(req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), &lun);
if (!d) {
resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
} else {
@@ -842,7 +848,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
break;
}
- tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
+ tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
if (tmpreq && tmpreq->sreq) {
assert(tmpreq->sreq->hba_private);
scsi_req_cancel(tmpreq->sreq);
@@ -867,7 +873,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
tmpreq = &s->reqs[i];
- if (tmpreq->iu.srp.cmd.lun != req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
+ if (req_iu(tmpreq)->srp.cmd.lun
+ != req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
continue;
}
if (!tmpreq->active || !tmpreq->sreq) {
@@ -911,7 +918,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
static int vscsi_handle_srp_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
- union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
+ union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
int done = 1;
uint8_t opcode = srp->rsp.opcode;
@@ -948,7 +955,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_adapter_info(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
struct mad_adapter_info_data info;
int rc;
- sinfo = &req->iu.mad.adapter_info;
+ sinfo = &req_iu(req)->mad.adapter_info;
#if 0 /* What for ? */
rc = spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, be64_to_cpu(sinfo->buffer),
@@ -984,7 +991,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
uint64_t buffer;
int rc;
- vcap = &req->iu.mad.capabilities;
+ vcap = &req_iu(req)->mad.capabilities;
req_len = len = be16_to_cpu(vcap->common.length);
buffer = be64_to_cpu(vcap->buffer);
if (len > sizeof(cap)) {
@@ -1029,7 +1036,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
static int vscsi_handle_mad_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
- union mad_iu *mad = &req->iu.mad;
+ union mad_iu *mad = &req_iu(req)->mad;
bool request_handled = false;
uint64_t retlen = 0;
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size
2020-03-05 8:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_iu() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05 8:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 10:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Paolo Bonzini
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-03-05 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
David Gibson
The 'union srp_iu' is meant as a pointer to any SRP Information
Unit type, it is not related to the size of a VIO DMA buffer.
Use a plain buffer for the VIO DMA read/write calls.
We can remove the reserved buffer from the 'union srp_iu'.
This issue was noticed when replacing the zero-length arrays
from hw/scsi/srp.h with flexible array member,
'clang -fsanitize=undefined' reported:
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c:69:29: error: field 'iu' with variable sized type 'union viosrp_iu' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU extension [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
union viosrp_iu iu;
^
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
v2: Removed unuseful _Static_assert (dgibson)
hw/scsi/viosrp.h | 1 -
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
index 25676c2383..e5f9768e8f 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
+++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ union srp_iu {
struct srp_tsk_mgmt tsk_mgmt;
struct srp_cmd cmd;
struct srp_rsp rsp;
- uint8_t reserved[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
};
enum viosrp_crq_formats {
diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 70547f98ac..acf9bb50bc 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ typedef union vscsi_crq {
typedef struct vscsi_req {
vscsi_crq crq;
- union viosrp_iu iu;
+ uint8_t viosrp_iu_buf[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
/* SCSI request tracking */
SCSIRequest *sreq;
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ typedef struct {
static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
{
- return &req->iu;
+ return (union viosrp_iu *)req->viosrp_iu_buf;
}
static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_get_req(VSCSIState *s)
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
/* First copy the SRP */
rc = spapr_vio_dma_write(&s->vdev, req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr,
- &req->iu, length);
+ &req->viosrp_iu_buf, length);
if (rc) {
fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_send_iu: DMA write failure !\n");
}
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_vscsi_req = {
.minimum_version_id = 1,
.fields = (VMStateField[]) {
VMSTATE_BUFFER(crq.raw, vscsi_req),
- VMSTATE_BUFFER(iu.srp.reserved, vscsi_req),
+ VMSTATE_BUFFER(viosrp_iu_buf, vscsi_req),
VMSTATE_UINT32(qtag, vscsi_req),
VMSTATE_BOOL(active, vscsi_req),
VMSTATE_UINT32(data_len, vscsi_req),
@@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq *crq)
}
/* XXX Handle failure differently ? */
- if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->iu,
+ if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->viosrp_iu_buf,
crq->s.IU_length)) {
fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_got_payload: DMA read failure !\n");
vscsi_put_req(req);
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use
2020-03-05 8:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-03-05 10:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-03-05 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, qemu-devel; +Cc: Fam Zheng, qemu-ppc, David Gibson
On 05/03/20 09:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> This series fixes a dangerous zero-length array use.
> Simples patches first to clean the issue in the last patch:
> dissociate the buffer holding DMA requests with pointer to
> SRP Information Unit packets.
>
> v2: Addressed David Gibson review comments
>
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (5):
> hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include
> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible
> array
> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit
> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_iu() helper
> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size
>
> hw/scsi/viosrp.h | 3 ++-
> hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
I think this is clearer than the "reserved" member, and it gets one
important thing right though by decoupling SRP_MAX_IU_LEN from
sizeof(union srp_iu).
However it doesn't fix the actual time bomb, which is that,
vscsi_send_rsp can overrun the buffer size here depending on the length
of sense data:
memcpy(req->iu.srp.rsp.data, req->sense, req->senselen);
But with this series in place we can fix that with just a couple of
asserts, like this:
/* This #define is why Phil's changes matter! */
#define SRP_MAX_IU_DATA_LEN (SRP_MAX_IU_LEN - sizeof(union srp_iu))
/* in vscsi_send_rsp */
int sense_data_len = MIN(req->senselen, SRP_MAX_IU_DATA_LEN);
req->iu.srp.rsp.sense_data_len = cpu_to_be32(sense_data_len);
memcpy(req->iu.srp.rsp.data, req->sense, sense_data_len);
/* in vscsi_send_iu */
assert(length < SRP_MAX_IU_LEN);
/* in vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt */
QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(SRP_MAX_IU_DATA_LEN < 4);
(Easier to write code than describe...).
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-05 10:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-05 8:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [MERGED PATCH v2 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [MERGED PATCH v2 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [MERGED PATCH v2 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_iu() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 8:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 10:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).