From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/16] target/i386: Load apicid model specific handlers from X86CPUDefinition
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:27:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200310092728.192c57c6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6fa5e13-3680-930f-2e0e-7651125ea309@amd.com>
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:04:39 -0500
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com> wrote:
> On 3/9/20 9:49 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Mar 2020 13:58:03 -0600
> > Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Load the model specific handlers if available or else default handlers
> >> will be loaded. Add the model specific handlers if apicid decoding
> >> differs from the standard sequential numbering.
> >>
> >
> > this is still the old version of the patch and hadn't addressed feedback from v4
>
> Yes. I was confused little bit about it. Will fix it.
>
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> >> ---
> >> target/i386/cpu.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> target/i386/cpu.h | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> >> index c75cf744ab..f33d8b77f5 100644
> >> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> >> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> >> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
> >> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> >> #include "sysemu/tcg.h"
> >> #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
> >> +#include "hw/i386/x86.h"
> > this dependency shouldn't be here, see below
>
> ok.
>
> >
> >> #include "hw/i386/topology.h"
> >> #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> >> #include "exec/address-spaces.h"
> > [...]
> >> +void cpu_x86_init_apicid_fns(MachineState *machine)
> > it should be something like:
> > x86_use_epyc_apic_id_encoding(char *cpu_type)
> > try to avoid pulling in unnecessary dependency on Machine into cpu.c
>
> Ok.
>
> >
> >> +{
> >> + X86CPUClass *xcc = X86_CPU_CLASS(object_class_by_name(machine->cpu_type));
> >> + X86CPUModel *model = xcc->model;
> >> + X86CPUDefinition *def = model->cpudef;
> >> + X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(machine);
> >> +
> >> + if (def) {
> >> + if (def->apicid_from_cpu_idx) {
> >> + x86ms->apicid_from_cpu_idx = def->apicid_from_cpu_idx;
> >> + }
> >> + if (def->topo_ids_from_apicid) {
> >> + x86ms->topo_ids_from_apicid = def->topo_ids_from_apicid;
> >> + }
> >> + if (def->apicid_from_topo_ids) {
> >> + x86ms->apicid_from_topo_ids = def->apicid_from_topo_ids;
> >> + }
> >> + if (def->apicid_pkg_offset) {
> >> + x86ms->apicid_pkg_offset = def->apicid_pkg_offset;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +}
> >
> > It was suggested to move defaults initialization to x86_machine_class_init()
>
> ok. We don't need the above changes. I will use the boolean as you
> suggested and call this function in x86_cpus_init() to initialize the EPYC
> specific handler. Something similar like this below..
>
> x86_use_epyc_apic_id_encoding(char *cpu_type)
> {
> X86CPUClass *xcc = ... cpu_type ...
> return xcc->model->cpudef->use_epyc_apic_id_encoding
> }
>
> x86_cpus_init()
> {
> if (x86_use_epyc_apic_id_encoding(ms->cpu_type)) {
> x86ms->apicid_from_cpu_idx = ...epyc...
> x86ms->topo_ids_from_apicid = ...epyc...
> x86ms->apicid_from_topo_ids = ...epyc...
> x86ms->apicid_pkg_offset = ...epyc...
> }
> }
>
> Sounds right?
yes, something like this
>
> >
> > as was suggested at
> > [PATCH v4 12/16] hw/i386: Use the apicid handlers from X86MachineState
> > and acked by Eduardo
> >
> >> +
> >> static CPUCaches epyc_cache_info = {
> >> .l1d_cache = &(CPUCacheInfo) {
> >> .type = DATA_CACHE,
> >> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
> >> index 20abbda647..34f0d994ef 100644
> >> --- a/target/i386/cpu.h
> >> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
> >> @@ -1895,6 +1895,7 @@ void cpu_clear_apic_feature(CPUX86State *env);
> >> void host_cpuid(uint32_t function, uint32_t count,
> >> uint32_t *eax, uint32_t *ebx, uint32_t *ecx, uint32_t *edx);
> >> void host_vendor_fms(char *vendor, int *family, int *model, int *stepping);
> >> +void cpu_x86_init_apicid_fns(MachineState *machine);
> >>
> >> /* helper.c */
> >> bool x86_cpu_tlb_fill(CPUState *cs, vaddr address, int size,
> >>
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-10 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-03 19:56 [PATCH v5 00/16] APIC ID fixes for AMD EPYC CPU model Babu Moger
2020-03-03 19:56 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] hw/i386: Rename X86CPUTopoInfo structure to X86CPUTopoIDs Babu Moger
2020-03-03 19:57 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] hw/i386: Introduce X86CPUTopoInfo to contain topology info Babu Moger
2020-03-09 14:10 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-10 23:04 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-03-03 19:57 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] hw/i386: Consolidate topology functions Babu Moger
2020-03-03 19:57 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] machine: Add SMP Sockets in CpuTopology Babu Moger
2020-03-09 14:17 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-09 18:01 ` Babu Moger
2020-03-03 19:57 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] hw/i386: Remove unnecessary initialization in x86_cpu_new Babu Moger
2020-03-09 14:18 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-03 19:57 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] hw/i386: Update structures to save the number of nodes per package Babu Moger
2020-03-09 14:26 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-03 19:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] hw/i386: Rename apicid_from_topo_ids to x86_apicid_from_topo_ids Babu Moger
2020-03-03 19:57 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] hw/386: Add EPYC mode topology decoding functions Babu Moger
2020-03-03 19:57 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] target/i386: Cleanup and use the EPYC mode topology functions Babu Moger
2020-03-03 19:57 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] hw/i386: Introduce apicid functions inside X86MachineState Babu Moger
2020-03-09 14:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] target/i386: Load apicid model specific handlers from X86CPUDefinition Babu Moger
2020-03-09 14:49 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-09 14:55 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-09 19:04 ` Babu Moger
2020-03-10 8:27 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2020-03-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] hw/i386: Use the apicid handlers from X86MachineState Babu Moger
2020-03-09 15:01 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-09 19:08 ` Babu Moger
2020-03-10 8:31 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] target/i386: Add EPYC model specific handlers Babu Moger
2020-03-09 15:03 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-09 19:12 ` Babu Moger
2020-03-10 8:25 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] hw/i386: Move arch_id decode inside x86_cpus_init Babu Moger
2020-03-09 15:21 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-09 19:31 ` Babu Moger
2020-03-10 8:35 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-10 20:05 ` Babu Moger
2020-03-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] i386: Fix pkg_id offset for EPYC cpu models Babu Moger
2020-03-09 15:22 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] tests: Update the Unit tests Babu Moger
2020-03-10 23:06 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-03-10 23:09 ` Moger, Babu
2020-03-08 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 00/16] APIC ID fixes for AMD EPYC CPU model Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-03-09 17:50 ` Babu Moger
2020-03-10 8:40 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-03-10 20:07 ` Babu Moger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200310092728.192c57c6@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).