From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC83AC10F29 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9563620714 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="SRigaC6H" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9563620714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:34278 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEDnp-0006yz-Pd for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:06:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51739) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEDn0-0006O9-7C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:05:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEDmy-0000TH-DZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:05:53 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.74]:43272) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEDmy-0000Jj-6G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:05:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1584457551; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q6gBqZLiVimV9CLnIyWtDxz3f4ecQLAHyF1s5sDOSxU=; b=SRigaC6H17S/R2kvClTKVWOyHBn7e1RFA7KZAOvaX/d2GltesGH/zaQa/lUS/+l29sE6lw eeowX4/hM/q36/da7IfP9zyWl7Qr/jv7saIDbTDbmXQ40uJb4jMxAk7CO8FJKiY55eCnhD 5s1hzVrsLvI/kEgNo8BeO4ywuzUmWJw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-407-MMI4_85nPiKtEeCMDcu3GQ-1; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:05:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: MMI4_85nPiKtEeCMDcu3GQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5DB1084436; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.36.110.52]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07ACB8F34E; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:05:28 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches Message-ID: <20200317150528.GK2041016@redhat.com> References: <20200317043819.20197-1-jsnow@redhat.com> <5805273e-0a2f-850a-a07a-97dac0d7211e@redhat.com> <20200317145703.GH2041016@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.13.3 (2020-01-12) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 216.205.24.74 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Kevin Wolf , Fam Zheng , Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , Qemu-block , Juan Quintela , Libvirt , QEMU Developers , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Stefan Hajnoczi , Max Reitz , John Snow , Markus Armbruster Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 03:00:48PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 14:57, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: > > I don't feel like -Wno-unused-function looses anything significant, as > > the GCC builds will still be reporting unused functions which will > > catch majority of cases. >=20 > The most interesting difference is that clang will catch unused > static inline functions which gcc does not. That's mostly just about dead code cruft detection IIUC. That code won't make it into the binary if it isn't used. Regards, Daniel --=20 |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange= :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com= :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange= :|