From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0575AC43331 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8E5020784 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="iuuUiIZS" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C8E5020784 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:43304 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJMNE-000322-QM for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:16:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJMMa-0002dU-OH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:15:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJMMY-0006DN-Cf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:15:51 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:59587 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJMMY-0006Cm-95 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:15:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1585682149; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qkAVqUAWrxnIaS4ZIGuL832+xxu7v+rbaa9kj5GjiV8=; b=iuuUiIZSN8G0n8XJuGYdbGv4qRcIsu6h50lIIl16xGu2ZnvRkPiub9vQB7LrIyhMa9dxTu rd3gtjguWdlgy2FMAU3X7NgTmTY7RzA4ZBhLLgR/imPyq2OAUjsovV+wyOHXuKrrC8qiId pHAXpm9klPU2JVwPFaIAIHP4/hCkbFE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-159-aPivUx9GPEGR0mZe-nW1nA-1; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:15:45 -0400 X-MC-Unique: aPivUx9GPEGR0mZe-nW1nA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B67B1005509; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from w520.home (ovpn-112-162.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.162]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A0E5C1BB; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:15:39 -0600 From: Alex Williamson To: Kirti Wankhede Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 Kernel 6/7] vfio iommu: Adds flag to indicate dirty pages tracking capability support Message-ID: <20200331131539.390259e1@w520.home> In-Reply-To: <6c6e6625-6dfd-d885-23fe-511744816d5b@nvidia.com> References: <1585587044-2408-1-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com> <1585587044-2408-7-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com> <20200330145814.32d9b652@w520.home> <6c6e6625-6dfd-d885-23fe-511744816d5b@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Zhengxiao.zx@Alibaba-inc.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, cjia@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, eskultet@redhat.com, ziye.yang@intel.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, cohuck@redhat.com, shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, zhi.a.wang@intel.com, mlevitsk@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, eauger@redhat.com, felipe@nutanix.com, jonathan.davies@nutanix.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com, changpeng.liu@intel.com, Ken.Xue@amd.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 00:38:49 +0530 Kirti Wankhede wrote: > On 3/31/2020 2:28 AM, Alex Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 22:20:43 +0530 > > Kirti Wankhede wrote: > > > >> Flag VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_DIRTY_PGS in VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO indicates that driver > >> support dirty pages tracking. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede > >> Reviewed-by: Neo Jia > >> --- > >> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 3 ++- > >> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 5 +++-- > >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > >> index 266550bd7307..9fe12b425976 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > >> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > >> @@ -2390,7 +2390,8 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data, > >> info.cap_offset = 0; /* output, no-recopy necessary */ > >> } > >> > >> - info.flags = VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_PGSIZES; > >> + info.flags = VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_PGSIZES | > >> + VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_DIRTY_PGS; > >> > >> info.iova_pgsizes = vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu); > >> > >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > >> index e3cbf8b78623..0fe7c9a6f211 100644 > >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > >> @@ -985,8 +985,9 @@ struct vfio_device_feature { > >> struct vfio_iommu_type1_info { > >> __u32 argsz; > >> __u32 flags; > >> -#define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_PGSIZES (1 << 0) /* supported page sizes info */ > >> -#define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_CAPS (1 << 1) /* Info supports caps */ > >> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_PGSIZES (1 << 0) /* supported page sizes info */ > >> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_CAPS (1 << 1) /* Info supports caps */ > >> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_DIRTY_PGS (1 << 2) /* supports dirty page tracking */ > >> __u64 iova_pgsizes; /* Bitmap of supported page sizes */ > >> __u32 cap_offset; /* Offset within info struct of first cap */ > >> }; > > > > > > As I just mentioned in my reply to Yan, I'm wondering if > > VFIO_CHECK_EXTENSION would be a better way to expose this. The > > difference is relatively trivial, but currently the only flag > > set by VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO is to indicate the presence of a field in > > the returned structure. I think this is largely true of other INFO > > ioctls within vfio as well and we're already using the > > VFIO_CHECK_EXTENSION ioctl to check supported IOMMU models, and IOMMU > > cache coherency. We'd simply need to define a VFIO_DIRTY_PGS_IOMMU > > value (9) and return 1 for that case. Then when we enable support for > > dirt pages that can span multiple mappings, we can add a v2 extensions, > > or "MULTI" variant of this extension, since it should be backwards > > compatible. > > > > The v2/multi version will again require that the user provide a zero'd > > bitmap, but I don't think that should be a problem as part of the > > definition of that version (we won't know if the user is using v1 or > > v2, but a v1 user should only retrieve bitmaps that exactly match > > existing mappings, where all bits will be written). Thanks, > > > > Alex > > > > I look at these two ioctls as : VFIO_CHECK_EXTENSION is used to get > IOMMU type, while VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO is used to get properties of a > particular IOMMU type, right? Not exclusively, see for example VFIO_DMA_CC_IOMMU, > Then I think VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_DIRTY_PGS should be part of > VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO and when we add code for v2/multi, a flag should be > added to VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO. Which burns through flags, which is a far more limited resource than our 32bit extension address space, especially when we're already planning for one or more extensions to this support. Thanks, Alex