From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: "Lukáš Doktor" <ldoktor@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"Halil Pasic" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 17:16:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200402171659.1ba57efc.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200401123754.109602-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:37:54 -0400
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Older QEMU versions did fixup the ram size to match what can be reported
> via sclp. We need to mimic this behaviour for machine types 4.2 and
> older to not fail on inbound migration for memory sizes that do not fit.
> Old machines with proper aligned memory sizes are not affected.
>
> Alignment table:
> VM size (<=) | Alignment
> --------------------------
> 1020M | 1M
> 2040M | 2M
> 4080M | 4M
> 8160M | 8M
> 16320M | 16M
> 32640M | 32M
> 65280M | 64M
> 130560M | 128M
> 261120M | 256M
> 522240M | 512M
> 1044480M | 1G
> 2088960M | 2G
> 4177920M | 4G
> 8355840M | 8G
>
> Suggested action is to replace unaligned -m value with a suitable
> aligned one or if a change to a newer machine type is possible, use a
> machine version >= 5.0.
>
> A future versions might remove the compatibility handling.
s/versions/version/ (fixed it up)
>
> For machine types >= 5.0 we can simply use an increment size of 1M and
> use the full range of increment number which allows for all possible
> memory sizes. The old limitation of having a maximum of 1020 increments
> was added for standby memory, which we no longer support. With that we
> can now support even weird memory sizes like 10001234 MB.
>
> As we no longer fixup maxram_size as well, make other users use ram_size
> instead. Keep using maxram_size when setting the maximum ram size in KVM,
> as that will come in handy in the future when supporting memory hotplug
> (in contrast, storage keys and storage attributes for hotplugged memory
> will have to be migrated per RAM block in the future).
>
> Fixes: 3a12fc61af5c ("390x/s390-virtio-ccw: use memdev for RAM")
> Reported-by: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com>
> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-skeys.c | 2 +-
> hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c | 4 ++--
> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/s390x/sclp.c | 17 +++++------------
> include/hw/boards.h | 7 +++++++
> softmmu/vl.c | 3 +++
> 6 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Thanks, applied to s390-fixes (with the fixup message fixed up.)
[I plan to send a pull request for s390-fixes tomorrow, so please let
me know if there are any further concerns.]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-02 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-01 12:37 [PATCH v3 1/1] vl/s390x: fixup ram sizes for compat machines Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-01 12:46 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-01 13:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-02 9:22 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-02 9:25 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-02 10:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-02 10:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-01 16:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-04-02 9:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-02 9:39 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-02 9:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-02 11:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-02 11:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-02 11:39 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-04-02 11:42 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-02 12:05 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-04-02 12:09 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-02 12:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-02 14:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-02 15:01 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-04-02 17:48 ` Peter Xu
2020-04-02 15:16 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200402171659.1ba57efc.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=ldoktor@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).