qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Subject: [PULL for-5.0 1/1] aio-posix: fix test-aio /aio/event/wait with fdmon-io_uring
Date: Fri,  3 Apr 2020 12:52:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200403115209.145810-2-stefanha@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200403115209.145810-1-stefanha@redhat.com>

When a file descriptor becomes ready we must re-arm POLL_ADD.  This is
done by adding an sqe to the io_uring sq ring.  The ->need_wait()
function wasn't taking pending sqes into account and therefore
io_uring_submit_and_wait() was not being called.  Polling for cqes
failed to detect fd readiness since we hadn't submitted the sqe to
io_uring.

This patch fixes the following tests/test-aio -p /aio/event/wait
failure:

  ok 11 /aio/event/wait
  **
  ERROR:tests/test-aio.c:374:test_flush_event_notifier: assertion failed: (aio_poll(ctx, false))

Reported-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200402145434.99349-1-stefanha@redhat.com
Fixes: 73fd282e7b6dd4e4ea1c3bbb3d302c8db51e4ccf
       ("aio-posix: add io_uring fd monitoring implementation")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 util/fdmon-io_uring.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/util/fdmon-io_uring.c b/util/fdmon-io_uring.c
index 7e143ef515..b4d6109f20 100644
--- a/util/fdmon-io_uring.c
+++ b/util/fdmon-io_uring.c
@@ -295,7 +295,12 @@ static bool fdmon_io_uring_need_wait(AioContext *ctx)
         return true;
     }
 
-    /* Do we need to submit new io_uring sqes? */
+    /* Are there pending sqes to submit? */
+    if (io_uring_sq_ready(&ctx->fdmon_io_uring)) {
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    /* Do we need to process AioHandlers for io_uring changes? */
     if (!QSLIST_EMPTY_RCU(&ctx->submit_list)) {
         return true;
     }
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-03 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-03 11:52 [PULL for-5.0 0/1] Block patches Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-04-03 11:52 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2020-04-03 15:18 ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200403115209.145810-2-stefanha@redhat.com \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=crobinso@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).