From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, s.reiter@proxmox.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dietmar@proxmox.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
mreitz@redhat.com, t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.0 v2 2/3] block: Increase BB.in_flight for coroutine interfaces
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 11:48:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200407094814.GC7695@linux.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1a2cb59-7969-5bb7-f5ce-ec4ab51199cb@virtuozzo.com>
Am 07.04.2020 um 11:10 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> 07.04.2020 11:52, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 07.04.2020 um 08:41 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> > > 06.04.2020 20:14, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > External callers of blk_co_*() don't currently increase the
> > > > BlockBackend.in_flight counter, but calls from blk_aio_*() do, so there
> > > > is an inconsistency whether the counter has been increased or not.
> > > >
> > > > This patch moves the actual operations to static functions that can
> > > > later know they will always be called with in_flight increased exactly
> > > > once, even for external callers using the blk_co_*() coroutine
> > > > interfaces.
> > > >
> > > > If the public blk_co_*() interface is unused, remove it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> > >
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> > >
> > > Still, did you consider instead just move inc/dec to _co_ functions, like
> > > [...]
> > > (and same for write, ioctl, flush, discard). It seems more
> > > consistent.. Should it work?
> >
> > No, it would be wrong because it would be too late. The main purpose of
> > blk_inc_in_flight() is to keep the request covered during the first and
> > the last phase outside of blk_co_*(), which can potentially involve BHs
> > like blk_aio_complete_bh().
>
> OK, thanks, I see now, we want to caver possible completion BH.
> Hmm, not too late but too early (for decrement).. As nothing interesting
> happening between increment in blk_aio_prwv and entering the coroutine with
> _do_ function.
Basically it covers everything that isn't yet covered by
bdrv_inc/dec_in_flight() on the node level, but completion is probably
the most important part.
Start, too, because actually something very interesting is happening
between blk_aio_prwv() and blk_do_*(): It uses bdrv_coroutine_enter(),
which in some circumstances may end up only scheduling the coroutine
instead of immediately entering it.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-07 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-06 17:14 [PATCH for-5.0 v2 0/3] block: Fix blk->in_flight during blk_wait_while_drained() Kevin Wolf
2020-04-06 17:14 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 1/3] block-backend: Reorder flush/pdiscard function definitions Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 5:45 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-07 9:22 ` Max Reitz
2020-04-06 17:14 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 2/3] block: Increase BB.in_flight for coroutine interfaces Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 6:41 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-07 8:52 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 9:10 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-07 9:48 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2020-04-07 10:00 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-07 10:04 ` Max Reitz
2020-04-07 10:15 ` Max Reitz
2020-04-07 11:13 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 11:27 ` Max Reitz
2020-04-06 17:14 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 3/3] block: Fix blk->in_flight during blk_wait_while_drained() Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 6:52 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-07 8:59 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 9:15 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-07 10:12 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200407094814.GC7695@linux.fritz.box \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar@proxmox.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=s.reiter@proxmox.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).