From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: fangying1@huawei.com, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] rcu: do not mention atomic_mb_read/set in documentation
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 10:07:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200407140746.8041-4-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200407140746.8041-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
docs/devel/rcu.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/devel/rcu.txt b/docs/devel/rcu.txt
index d83fed2f79..0ce15ba198 100644
--- a/docs/devel/rcu.txt
+++ b/docs/devel/rcu.txt
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ The core RCU API is small:
typeof(*p) atomic_rcu_read(p);
- atomic_rcu_read() is similar to atomic_mb_read(), but it makes
+ atomic_rcu_read() is similar to atomic_load_acquire(), but it makes
some assumptions on the code that calls it. This allows a more
optimized implementation.
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ The core RCU API is small:
void atomic_rcu_set(p, typeof(*p) v);
- atomic_rcu_set() is also similar to atomic_mb_set(), and it also
+ atomic_rcu_set() is similar to atomic_store_release(), though it also
makes assumptions on the code that calls it in order to allow a more
optimized implementation.
--
2.18.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-07 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-07 14:07 [RFC PATCH 0/4] async: fix hangs on weakly-ordered architectures Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-07 14:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] atomics: convert to reStructuredText Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-07 16:49 ` Alex Bennée
2020-04-07 14:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] atomics: update documentation Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-07 15:25 ` Richard Henderson
2020-04-07 15:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-07 14:07 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-04-07 17:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] rcu: do not mention atomic_mb_read/set in documentation Richard Henderson
2020-04-07 14:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] aio-wait: delegate polling of main AioContext if BQL not held Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-07 14:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] async: use explicit memory barriers Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-09 6:22 ` Ying Fang
2020-04-08 9:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] async: fix hangs on weakly-ordered architectures Ying Fang
2020-04-08 15:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-09 6:54 ` Ying Fang
2020-04-09 15:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200407140746.8041-4-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=fangying1@huawei.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).