From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [PULL 3/7] backup: don't acquire aio_context in backup_clean
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 16:26:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200407142616.7961-4-kwolf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200407142616.7961-1-kwolf@redhat.com>
From: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
All code-paths leading to backup_clean (via job_clean) have the job's
context already acquired. The job's context is guaranteed to be the same
as the one used by backup_top via backup_job_create.
Since the previous logic effectively acquired the lock twice, this
broke cleanup of backups for disks using IO threads, since the BDRV_POLL_WHILE
in bdrv_backup_top_drop -> bdrv_do_drained_begin would only release the lock
once, thus deadlocking with the IO thread.
This is a partial revert of 0abf2581717a19.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200407115651.69472-4-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
block/backup.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c
index 7430ca5883..a7a7dcaf4c 100644
--- a/block/backup.c
+++ b/block/backup.c
@@ -126,11 +126,7 @@ static void backup_abort(Job *job)
static void backup_clean(Job *job)
{
BackupBlockJob *s = container_of(job, BackupBlockJob, common.job);
- AioContext *aio_context = bdrv_get_aio_context(s->backup_top);
-
- aio_context_acquire(aio_context);
bdrv_backup_top_drop(s->backup_top);
- aio_context_release(aio_context);
}
void backup_do_checkpoint(BlockJob *job, Error **errp)
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-07 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-07 14:26 [PULL 0/7] Block layer patches Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 14:26 ` [PULL 1/7] job: take each job's lock individually in job_txn_apply Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 14:26 ` [PULL 2/7] replication: assert we own context before job_cancel_sync Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 14:26 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2020-04-07 14:26 ` [PULL 4/7] block-backend: Reorder flush/pdiscard function definitions Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 14:26 ` [PULL 5/7] block: Increase BB.in_flight for coroutine and sync interfaces Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 14:26 ` [PULL 6/7] block: Fix blk->in_flight during blk_wait_while_drained() Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 14:26 ` [PULL 7/7] vpc: Don't round up already aligned BAT sizes Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 19:54 ` [PULL 0/7] Block layer patches Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200407142616.7961-4-kwolf@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).