From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] device-core: use atomic_set on .realized property
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:36:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200416203624.32366-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200416203624.32366-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Some code might race with placement of new devices on a bus.
We currently first place a (unrealized) device on the bus
and then realize it.
As a workaround, users that scan the child device list, can
check the realized property to see if it is safe to access such a device.
Use an atomic write here too to aid with this.
A separate discussion is what to do with devices that are unrealized:
It looks like for this case we only call the hotplug handler's unplug
callback and its up to it to unrealize the device.
An atomic operation doesn't cause harm for this code path though.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
hw/core/qdev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/core/qdev.c b/hw/core/qdev.c
index f0c87e582e..bbb1ae3eb3 100644
--- a/hw/core/qdev.c
+++ b/hw/core/qdev.c
@@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ static void device_set_realized(Object *obj, bool value, Error **errp)
}
assert(local_err == NULL);
- dev->realized = value;
+ atomic_set(&dev->realized, value);
return;
child_realize_fail:
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-16 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-16 20:36 [PATCH 0/4] RFC/WIP: Fix scsi devices plug/unplug races w.r.t virtio-scsi iothread Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-16 20:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] scsi/scsi_bus: switch search direction in scsi_device_find Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-16 20:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] device-core: use RCU for list of childs of a bus Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-04 10:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-05-11 8:48 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-16 20:36 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2020-05-04 10:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] device-core: use atomic_set on .realized property Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-05-04 11:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-04 11:36 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-11 11:00 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-11 11:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-11 11:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-16 20:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] virtio-scsi: don't touch scsi devices that are not yet realized Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-04 11:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-11 11:21 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-16 21:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] RFC/WIP: Fix scsi devices plug/unplug races w.r.t virtio-scsi iothread no-reply
2020-04-16 21:35 ` no-reply
2020-04-16 21:47 ` no-reply
2020-05-04 10:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-05-04 11:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-04 11:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200416203624.32366-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).