From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, "Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Laine Stump" <laine@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/pci/pcie: Forbid hot-plug via QMP if it's disabled on the slot
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:10:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200417070818-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMDeoFXZHjLQ=LZrStS6nLuLk1M9__Jy19D_TLEbtSgC1kYXUA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 01:03:01PM +0200, Julia Suvorova wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:51 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:20:33PM +0200, Julia Suvorova wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 12:55 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 12:51:20PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 16:50:17 +0200
> > > > > Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Raise an error when trying to hot-plug/unplug a device through QMP to a device
> > > > > > with disabled hot-plug capability. This makes the device behaviour more
> > > > > > consistent and provides an explanation of the failure in the case of
> > > > > > asynchronous unplug.
> > > > >
> > > > > it applies to hotplug in general (i.e. not only QMP)
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > hw/pci/pcie.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > > > > > index 0eb3a2a5d2..e9798caa8a 100644
> > > > > > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > > > > > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > > > > > @@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_plug_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > PCIDevice *hotplug_pdev = PCI_DEVICE(hotplug_dev);
> > > > > > uint8_t *exp_cap = hotplug_pdev->config + hotplug_pdev->exp.exp_cap;
> > > > > > + uint32_t sltcap = pci_get_word(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTCAP);
> > > > > > PCIDevice *pci_dev = PCI_DEVICE(dev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* Don't send event when device is enabled during qemu machine creation:
> > > > > > @@ -430,6 +431,13 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_plug_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> > > > > > return;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + /* Hot-plug is disabled on the slot */
> > > > > > + if ((sltcap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC) == 0) {
> > > > > > + error_setg(errp, "Device '%s' does not support hot-plug",
> > > > > > + DEVICE(hotplug_dev)->id);
> > > > > plug and unplug_req are synchronous. so one can skip on "Device '%s'",
> > > > > user will get this error message as response to device_add/del command.
> > > > >
> > > > > and more exactly it's concrete slot that does not support hotplug, how about
> > > > > "slot doesn't support ..." or just "hotlpug is not supported"
> > > >
> > > > Well device name is useful here, while these commands are synchronous
> > > > others aren't so log parsing might not be synchronous.
> > > >
> > > > I do think we should mention slot since that's the reason
> > > > hotplug failed:
> > > > "Device '%s' hot-plug failed: unsupported by slot"
> > > >
> > > > > > + return;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > /* To enable multifunction hot-plug, we just ensure the function
> > > > > > * 0 added last. When function 0 is added, we set the sltsta and
> > > > > > * inform OS via event notification.
> > > > > > @@ -464,14 +472,24 @@ static void pcie_unplug_device(PCIBus *bus, PCIDevice *dev, void *opaque)
> > > > > > object_unparent(OBJECT(dev));
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -void pcie_cap_slot_unplug_request_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> > > > > > +void pcie_cap_slot_unplug_request_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_handler,
> > > > > > DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > Error *local_err = NULL;
> > > > > > PCIDevice *pci_dev = PCI_DEVICE(dev);
> > > > > > PCIBus *bus = pci_get_bus(pci_dev);
> > > > > > + PCIDevice *hotplug_dev = PCI_DEVICE(hotplug_handler);
> > > > > > + uint8_t *exp_cap = hotplug_dev->config + hotplug_dev->exp.exp_cap;
> > > > > > + uint32_t sltcap = pci_get_word(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTCAP);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /* Hot-unplug is disabled on the slot */
> > > > > > + if ((sltcap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC) == 0) {
> > > > > > + error_setg(errp, "Device '%s' does not support hot-unplug",
> > > > > > + DEVICE(hotplug_dev)->id);
> > > > > > + return;
> > > >
> > > > Here too let's mention slot since that's the reason
> > > > hotplug failed:
> > > > "Device '%s' hot-unplug failed: unsupported by slot"
> > > >
> > > > ?
> > >
> > > Just to mention, for a user it's disabled on the device,
> >
> > How?
> > I assumed this is what is used:
> >
> > commit 530a0963184e57e71a5b538e9161f115df533e96
> > Author: Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
> > Date: Wed Feb 26 18:46:07 2020 +0100
> >
> > pcie_root_port: Add hotplug disabling option
> >
> > Make hot-plug/hot-unplug on PCIe Root Ports optional to allow libvirt
> > manage it and restrict unplug for the whole machine. This is going to
> > prevent user-initiated unplug in guests (Windows mostly).
> > Hotplug is enabled by default.
> > Usage:
> > -device pcie-root-port,hotplug=off,...
> >
> >
> > so it looks like user has to disable it on the slot.
>
> By device I mean root port, and it's shown in the error message. If
> you think it's not correct, I'll change it.
Oh I see. It might be confusing for user: I add device A
and get a report "Device B does not support hot-plug".
How about:
"Hot-plug failed: unsupported by port device %s"?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-07 14:50 [PATCH] hw/pci/pcie: Forbid hot-plug via QMP if it's disabled on the slot Julia Suvorova
2020-04-08 10:51 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-04-13 10:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-04-15 20:20 ` Julia Suvorova
2020-04-17 9:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-04-17 11:03 ` Julia Suvorova
2020-04-17 11:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-04-17 12:17 ` Julia Suvorova
2020-04-14 8:07 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2020-04-15 20:13 ` Julia Suvorova
2020-04-20 21:41 ` Julia Suvorova
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200417070818-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jusual@redhat.com \
--cc=laine@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).