[PATCH 5/6] target/arm/cpu: Update coding style to make checkpatch.pl happy

["Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>]

We will move this code in the next commit. Clean it up
first to avoid checkpatch.pl errors.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 target/arm/cpu.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index 9023d9e2cf..1ddf850f00 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -582,7 +582,8 @@ static bool arm_v7m_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
     CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
     bool ret = false;
 
-    /* ARMv7-M interrupt masking works differently than -A or -R.
+    /*
+     * ARMv7-M interrupt masking works differently than -A or -R.
      * There is no FIQ/IRQ distinction. Instead of I and F bits
      * masking FIQ and IRQ interrupts, an exception is taken only
      * if it is higher priority than the current execution priority
@@ -1902,7 +1903,8 @@ static void arm1026_initfn(Object *obj)
 static void arm1136_r2_initfn(Object *obj)
 {
     ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
-    /* What qemu calls "arm1136_r2" is actually the 1136 r0p2, ie an
+    /*
+     * What qemu calls "arm1136_r2" is actually the 1136 r0p2, ie an
      * older core than plain "arm1136". In particular this does not
      * have the v6K features.
      * These ID register values are correct for 1136 but may be wrong
@@ -2688,7 +2690,8 @@ static const ARMCPUInfo arm_cpus[] = {
     { .name = "arm926",      .initfn = arm926_initfn },
     { .name = "arm946",      .initfn = arm946_initfn },
     { .name = "arm1026",     .initfn = arm1026_initfn },
-    /* What QEMU calls "arm1136-r2" is actually the 1136 r0p2, i.e. an
+    /*
+     * What QEMU calls "arm1136-r2" is actually the 1136 r0p2, i.e. an
      * older core than plain "arm1136". In particular this does not
      * have the v6K features.
      */
-- 
2.21.1