qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, fam@euphon.net, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
	den@openvz.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/9] block/io: refactor bdrv_is_allocated_above to run only one coroutine
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:38:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200427143907.5710-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200427143907.5710-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

bdrv_is_allocated_above creates new coroutine on each iteration if
called from non-coroutine context. To simplify expansion of in_flight
inc/dec sections in further patch let's refactor it.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
---
 block/io.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index aba67f66b9..94ab8eaa0f 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -2482,6 +2482,22 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_block_status_above(BlockDriverState *bs,
     return ret;
 }
 
+static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_is_allocated(BlockDriverState *bs,
+                                             int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
+                                             int64_t *pnum)
+{
+    int ret;
+    int64_t dummy;
+
+    ret = bdrv_co_block_status_above(bs, backing_bs(bs), false, offset,
+                                     bytes, pnum ? pnum : &dummy, NULL,
+                                     NULL);
+    if (ret < 0) {
+        return ret;
+    }
+    return !!(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED);
+}
+
 /* Coroutine wrapper for bdrv_block_status_above() */
 static void coroutine_fn bdrv_block_status_above_co_entry(void *opaque)
 {
@@ -2578,10 +2594,10 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_is_allocated(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
  * but 'pnum' will only be 0 when end of file is reached.
  *
  */
-int bdrv_is_allocated_above(BlockDriverState *top,
-                            BlockDriverState *base,
-                            bool include_base, int64_t offset,
-                            int64_t bytes, int64_t *pnum)
+static int coroutine_fn
+bdrv_co_is_allocated_above(BlockDriverState *top, BlockDriverState *base,
+                           bool include_base, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
+                           int64_t *pnum)
 {
     BlockDriverState *intermediate;
     int ret;
@@ -2595,7 +2611,7 @@ int bdrv_is_allocated_above(BlockDriverState *top,
         int64_t size_inter;
 
         assert(intermediate);
-        ret = bdrv_is_allocated(intermediate, offset, bytes, &pnum_inter);
+        ret = bdrv_co_is_allocated(intermediate, offset, bytes, &pnum_inter);
         if (ret < 0) {
             return ret;
         }
@@ -2624,6 +2640,56 @@ int bdrv_is_allocated_above(BlockDriverState *top,
     return 0;
 }
 
+typedef struct BdrvCoIsAllocatedAboveData {
+    BlockDriverState *top;
+    BlockDriverState *base;
+    bool include_base;
+    int64_t offset;
+    int64_t bytes;
+    int64_t *pnum;
+    int ret;
+    bool done;
+} BdrvCoIsAllocatedAboveData;
+
+static void coroutine_fn bdrv_is_allocated_above_co_entry(void *opaque)
+{
+    BdrvCoIsAllocatedAboveData *data = opaque;
+
+    data->ret = bdrv_co_is_allocated_above(data->top, data->base,
+                                           data->include_base,
+                                           data->offset, data->bytes,
+                                           data->pnum);
+    data->done = true;
+    aio_wait_kick();
+}
+
+int bdrv_is_allocated_above(BlockDriverState *top, BlockDriverState *base,
+                            bool include_base, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
+                            int64_t *pnum)
+{
+    Coroutine *co;
+    BdrvCoIsAllocatedAboveData data = {
+        .top = top,
+        .base = base,
+        .include_base = include_base,
+        .offset = offset,
+        .bytes = bytes,
+        .pnum = pnum,
+        .done = false,
+    };
+
+    if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
+        /* Fast-path if already in coroutine context */
+        bdrv_is_allocated_above_co_entry(&data);
+    } else {
+        co = qemu_coroutine_create(bdrv_is_allocated_above_co_entry, &data);
+        bdrv_coroutine_enter(top, co);
+        BDRV_POLL_WHILE(top, !data.done);
+    }
+
+    return data.ret;
+}
+
 typedef struct BdrvVmstateCo {
     BlockDriverState    *bs;
     QEMUIOVector        *qiov;
-- 
2.21.0



  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-27 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-27 14:38 [PATCH v2 0/9] block/io: safer inc/dec in_flight sections Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:38 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2020-05-01 21:25   ` [PATCH v2 1/9] block/io: refactor bdrv_is_allocated_above to run only one coroutine Eric Blake
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] block/io: refactor bdrv_co_ioctl: move aio stuff to corresponding block Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] block/io: move flush and pdiscard stuff down Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] block/io: move bdrv_rw_co_entry and friends down Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] block/io: expand in_flight inc/dec section: simple cases Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 21:43   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-06  7:02   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-18 18:21     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 10:52     ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-19 11:06       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 11:16         ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-19 11:25           ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 14:01             ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 14:33               ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-19 16:54                 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 11:04   ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] block/io: expand in_flight inc/dec section: block-status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 22:00   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-19 10:57     ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] block/io: add bdrv_do_pwrite_zeroes Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 22:05   ` Eric Blake
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] block/io: move bdrv_make_zero under block-status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] block/io: expand in_flight inc/dec section: bdrv_make_zero Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 22:08   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-19 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] block/io: safer inc/dec in_flight sections Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200427143907.5710-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).