qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PULL 10/20] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:44:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200430094445.25943-11-cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200430094445.25943-1-cohuck@redhat.com>

From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

SCLP for a protected guest is done over the SIDAD, so we need to use
the s390_cpu_pv_mem_* functions to access the SIDAD instead of guest
memory when reading/writing SCBs.

To not confuse the sclp emulation, we set 0x4000 as the SCCB address,
since the function that injects the sclp external interrupt would
reject a zero sccb address.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20200319131921.2367-10-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
 hw/s390x/sclp.c         | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 include/hw/s390x/sclp.h |  2 ++
 target/s390x/kvm.c      | 25 ++++++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
index f0c35aa57afd..ede056b3efd7 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -33,6 +33,22 @@ static inline SCLPDevice *get_sclp_device(void)
     return sclp;
 }
 
+static inline bool sclp_command_code_valid(uint32_t code)
+{
+    switch (code & SCLP_CMD_CODE_MASK) {
+    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO:
+    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED:
+    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_CPU_INFO:
+    case SCLP_CMDW_CONFIGURE_IOA:
+    case SCLP_CMDW_DECONFIGURE_IOA:
+    case SCLP_CMD_READ_EVENT_DATA:
+    case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA:
+    case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK:
+        return true;
+    }
+    return false;
+}
+
 static void prepare_cpu_entries(SCLPDevice *sclp, CPUEntry *entry, int *count)
 {
     MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
@@ -193,6 +209,34 @@ static void sclp_execute(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb, uint32_t code)
     }
 }
 
+/*
+ * We only need the address to have something valid for the
+ * service_interrupt call.
+ */
+#define SCLP_PV_DUMMY_ADDR 0x4000
+int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb,
+                                uint32_t code)
+{
+    SCLPDevice *sclp = get_sclp_device();
+    SCLPDeviceClass *sclp_c = SCLP_GET_CLASS(sclp);
+    SCCB work_sccb;
+    hwaddr sccb_len = sizeof(SCCB);
+
+    s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(env_archcpu(env), 0, &work_sccb, sccb_len);
+
+    if (!sclp_command_code_valid(code)) {
+        work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
+        goto out_write;
+    }
+
+    sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
+out_write:
+    s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, &work_sccb,
+                          be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length));
+    sclp_c->service_interrupt(sclp, SCLP_PV_DUMMY_ADDR);
+    return 0;
+}
+
 int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code)
 {
     SCLPDevice *sclp = get_sclp_device();
@@ -225,17 +269,7 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code)
         return -PGM_SPECIFICATION;
     }
 
-    switch (code & SCLP_CMD_CODE_MASK) {
-    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO:
-    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED:
-    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_CPU_INFO:
-    case SCLP_CMDW_CONFIGURE_IOA:
-    case SCLP_CMDW_DECONFIGURE_IOA:
-    case SCLP_CMD_READ_EVENT_DATA:
-    case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA:
-    case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK:
-        break;
-    default:
+    if (!sclp_command_code_valid(code)) {
         work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
         goto out_write;
     }
diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
index cd7b24359f28..822eff4396ff 100644
--- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
+++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
@@ -217,5 +217,7 @@ void s390_sclp_init(void);
 void sclp_service_interrupt(uint32_t sccb);
 void raise_irq_cpu_hotplug(void);
 int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code);
+int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb,
+                                uint32_t code);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
index e0b61680ab08..870dd1b52b6e 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
@@ -1233,12 +1233,27 @@ static void kvm_sclp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run,
     sccb = env->regs[ipbh0 & 0xf];
     code = env->regs[(ipbh0 & 0xf0) >> 4];
 
-    r = sclp_service_call(env, sccb, code);
-    if (r < 0) {
-        kvm_s390_program_interrupt(cpu, -r);
-        return;
+    switch (run->s390_sieic.icptcode) {
+    case ICPT_PV_INSTR_NOTIFICATION:
+        g_assert(s390_is_pv());
+        /* The notification intercepts are currently handled by KVM */
+        error_report("unexpected SCLP PV notification");
+        exit(1);
+        break;
+    case ICPT_PV_INSTR:
+        g_assert(s390_is_pv());
+        sclp_service_call_protected(env, sccb, code);
+        /* Setting the CC is done by the Ultravisor. */
+        break;
+    case ICPT_INSTRUCTION:
+        g_assert(!s390_is_pv());
+        r = sclp_service_call(env, sccb, code);
+        if (r < 0) {
+            kvm_s390_program_interrupt(cpu, -r);
+            return;
+        }
+        setcc(cpu, r);
     }
-    setcc(cpu, r);
 }
 
 static int handle_b2(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run, uint8_t ipa1)
-- 
2.21.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-30  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-30  9:44 [PULL 00/20] first set of s390x patches for 5.1 Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 01/20] virtio-net: fix rsc_ext compat handling Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 02/20] linux-headers: update against Linux 5.7-rc3 Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 03/20] s390x: Move diagnose 308 subcodes and rcs into ipl.h Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 04/20] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 05/20] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 06/20] s390x: protvirt: Inhibit balloon when switching to protected mode Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 07/20] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 08/20] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 09/20] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 11/20] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 12/20] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDA Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 13/20] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 14/20] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 15/20] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 16/20] docs: system: Add protvirt docs Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 17/20] s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1 Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 18/20] s390x: protvirt: Fix stray error_report_err in s390_machine_protect Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 19/20] s390x/pv: Retry ioctls on -EINTR Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30  9:44 ` [PULL 20/20] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: Fix build on systems without KVM Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 13:54 ` [PULL 00/20] first set of s390x patches for 5.1 Peter Maydell
2020-04-30 15:36 ` no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200430094445.25943-11-cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).