From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PULL 14/20] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:44:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200430094445.25943-15-cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200430094445.25943-1-cohuck@redhat.com>
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
For protected guests, we need to put the IO emulation results into the
SIDA, so SIE will write them into the guest at the next entry.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200319131921.2367-14-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
target/s390x/ioinst.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/s390x/ioinst.c b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
index 8828482eec30..7a14c52c123b 100644
--- a/target/s390x/ioinst.c
+++ b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
@@ -138,7 +138,9 @@ void ioinst_handle_msch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
return;
}
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &schib, sizeof(schib))) {
+ if (s390_is_pv()) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, addr, &schib, sizeof(schib));
+ } else if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &schib, sizeof(schib))) {
s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
return;
}
@@ -195,7 +197,9 @@ void ioinst_handle_ssch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
return;
}
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &orig_orb, sizeof(orb))) {
+ if (s390_is_pv()) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, addr, &orig_orb, sizeof(orb));
+ } else if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &orig_orb, sizeof(orb))) {
s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
return;
}
@@ -231,14 +235,19 @@ void ioinst_handle_stcrw(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
cc = css_do_stcrw(&crw);
/* 0 - crw stored, 1 - zeroes stored */
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &crw, sizeof(crw)) == 0) {
+ if (s390_is_pv()) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr, &crw, sizeof(crw));
setcc(cpu, cc);
} else {
- if (cc == 0) {
- /* Write failed: requeue CRW since STCRW is suppressing */
- css_undo_stcrw(&crw);
+ if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &crw, sizeof(crw)) == 0) {
+ setcc(cpu, cc);
+ } else {
+ if (cc == 0) {
+ /* Write failed: requeue CRW since STCRW is suppressing */
+ css_undo_stcrw(&crw);
+ }
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
}
- s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
}
}
@@ -260,6 +269,13 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb,
}
if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(reg1, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid)) {
+ /*
+ * The Ultravisor checks schid bit 16 to be one and bits 0-12
+ * to be 0 and injects a operand exception itself.
+ *
+ * Hence we should never end up here.
+ */
+ g_assert(!s390_is_pv());
/*
* As operand exceptions have a lower priority than access exceptions,
* we check whether the memory area is writeable (injecting the
@@ -292,14 +308,17 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb,
}
}
if (cc != 3) {
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &schib,
- sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
+ if (s390_is_pv()) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr, &schib, sizeof(schib));
+ } else if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &schib,
+ sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
return;
}
} else {
/* Access exceptions have a higher priority than cc3 */
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
+ if (!s390_is_pv() &&
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
return;
}
@@ -336,7 +355,9 @@ int ioinst_handle_tsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
}
/* 0 - status pending, 1 - not status pending, 3 - not operational */
if (cc != 3) {
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &irb, irb_len) != 0) {
+ if (s390_is_pv()) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr, &irb, irb_len);
+ } else if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &irb, irb_len) != 0) {
s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
return -EFAULT;
}
@@ -344,7 +365,8 @@ int ioinst_handle_tsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
} else {
irb_len = sizeof(irb) - sizeof(irb.emw);
/* Access exceptions have a higher priority than cc3 */
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, irb_len) != 0) {
+ if (!s390_is_pv() &&
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, irb_len) != 0) {
s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
return -EFAULT;
}
@@ -642,7 +664,9 @@ void ioinst_handle_chsc(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
* present CHSC sub-handlers ... if we ever need more, we should take
* care of req->len here first.
*/
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, reg, buf, sizeof(ChscReq))) {
+ if (s390_is_pv()) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, addr, buf, sizeof(ChscReq));
+ } else if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, reg, buf, sizeof(ChscReq))) {
s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
return;
}
@@ -675,11 +699,16 @@ void ioinst_handle_chsc(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
break;
}
- if (!s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr + len, reg, res,
- be16_to_cpu(res->len))) {
+ if (s390_is_pv()) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr + len, res, be16_to_cpu(res->len));
setcc(cpu, 0); /* Command execution complete */
} else {
- s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+ if (!s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr + len, reg, res,
+ be16_to_cpu(res->len))) {
+ setcc(cpu, 0); /* Command execution complete */
+ } else {
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+ }
}
}
--
2.21.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-30 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-30 9:44 [PULL 00/20] first set of s390x patches for 5.1 Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 01/20] virtio-net: fix rsc_ext compat handling Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 02/20] linux-headers: update against Linux 5.7-rc3 Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 03/20] s390x: Move diagnose 308 subcodes and rcs into ipl.h Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 04/20] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 05/20] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 06/20] s390x: protvirt: Inhibit balloon when switching to protected mode Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 07/20] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 08/20] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 09/20] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 10/20] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 11/20] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 12/20] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDA Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 13/20] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 15/20] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 16/20] docs: system: Add protvirt docs Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 17/20] s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1 Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 18/20] s390x: protvirt: Fix stray error_report_err in s390_machine_protect Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 19/20] s390x/pv: Retry ioctls on -EINTR Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 9:44 ` [PULL 20/20] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: Fix build on systems without KVM Cornelia Huck
2020-04-30 13:54 ` [PULL 00/20] first set of s390x patches for 5.1 Peter Maydell
2020-04-30 15:36 ` no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200430094445.25943-15-cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).