From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5938AC4724C for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 271FF206D9 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="a6LoNleV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 271FF206D9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54956 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jU9sc-0007p8-5z for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 10:09:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jU9gb-00084F-LU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:57:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jU9gI-00080o-Td for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:57:08 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:35540 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jU9gI-000808-Cd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:56:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588255007; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XS7u5ablesSdZITBn5CDn6l01hmPYtW9H+Z1fnvDIpE=; b=a6LoNleVbKvFlSAVa3RpgxJPNhDhKmjGfwagNb9oHGgnw5+QBqoP9EwdXqSNT6fWusIytx LyQyS0yFS5fcO0jg/PAfrhTzIYAJ9wKoQsVMraJqv12rQzVO8/AFwQbb8i3EWcpBhtQ1MY n/Y6Hhgl7cAXb55H5D/gUliJKfWDQ40= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-152-eaGRsDsxOkS_QWHlrEPGTw-1; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:56:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: eaGRsDsxOkS_QWHlrEPGTw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32274468 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from horse.redhat.com (ovpn-115-229.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.115.229]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010D81002392; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by horse.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 10451) id 88B4B223620; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:56:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:56:39 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtiofsd: Show submounts Message-ID: <20200430135639.GA260081@redhat.com> References: <20200424133516.73077-1-mreitz@redhat.com> <20200427175902.GM2923@work-vm> <20200429145720.GA2835@work-vm> <8c73f374-fcc8-1684-b581-84a9ab501aa9@redhat.com> <20200430085812.GC2874@work-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200430085812.GC2874@work-vm> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.61; envelope-from=vgoyal@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/30 01:04:40 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.61 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: virtio-fs@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 09:58:12AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: [..] > > > Even without this patch, the SLAVE stuff worked so if you start the > > > daemon and *then* mount under the shared directory, the guest sees it > > > with or without this patch. > >=20 > > Hm, I don=E2=80=99t. Do you really? >=20 > Yes! With your patch reverted: >=20 > Start virtiofsd, mount in the guest: >=20 > host: > # ./virtiofsd --socket-path=3D/tmp/vhostqemu -o source=3D/home/dgilbert/v= irtio-fs/fs -o log_level=3Dwarn -o no_writeback >=20 > guest: > # mount -t virtiofs myfs /sysroot >=20 > host: > # findmnt -o +PROPAGATION -N 6100 > TARGET SOURCE = FSTYPE OPTIONS PROPA= GATION > / /dev/mapper/fedora_dgilbert--t580-root[/home/dgilbert/virtio-fs/fs= ] xfs rw,relatime,seclabel,attr2,inode64,logbufs=3D8,logbsize=3D32k,no p= rivate,slave > # mount -t tmpfs /dev/null /home/dgilbert/virtio-fs/fs/tmp > # findmnt -o +PROPAGATION -N 6100 > TARGET SOURCE = FSTYPE OPTIONS PROPA= GATION > / /dev/mapper/fedora_dgilbert--t580-root[/home/dgilbert/virtio-fs/fs= ] xfs rw,relatime,seclabel,attr2,inode64,logbufs=3D8,logbsize=3D32k,no p= rivate,slave > =E2=94=94=E2=94=80/tmp /dev/null = tmpfs rw,relatime,seclabel = private,slave Why is it showing a mount point at "/tmp". If mount point propagated, then inside guest we should see a mount point at /sysroot/tmp? So there are two things. A. Propagation of mount from host to virtiofsd. B. Visibility of that mount inside guest over fuse protocol (submount functionality). I think A works for me without any patches. But don't think B is working for me. I don't see the submount inside guest.=20 > # touch /home/dgilbert/virtio-fs/fs/tmp/hello >=20 > guest: > # ls -l /sysroot/tmp > total 0 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Apr 30 08:50 hello Do a "findmnt /sysroot/tmp" inside guest and see what do you see. You will be able to see "hello" as long as virtiofsd sees the new mount point, I think. And guest does not have to see that mount point for this simple test to work. Vivek