From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Cc: fam@euphon.net, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] bdrv_flush: only use fast path when in owned AioContext
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 12:57:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512105719.GI5951@linux.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200511165032.11384-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Am 11.05.2020 um 18:50 hat Stefan Reiter geschrieben:
> Just because we're in a coroutine doesn't imply ownership of the context
> of the flushed drive. In such a case use the slow path which explicitly
> enters bdrv_flush_co_entry in the correct AioContext.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
> ---
>
> We've experienced some lockups in this codepath when taking snapshots of VMs
> with drives that have IO-Threads enabled (we have an async 'savevm'
> implementation running from a coroutine).
>
> Currently no reproducer for upstream versions I could find, but in testing this
> patch fixes all issues we're seeing and I think the logic checks out.
>
> The fast path pattern is repeated a few times in this file, so if this change
> makes sense, it's probably worth evaluating the other occurences as well.
What do you mean by "owning" the context? If it's about taking the
AioContext lock, isn't the problem more with calling bdrv_flush() from
code that doesn't take the locks?
Though I think we have some code that doesn't only rely on holding the
AioContext locks, but that actually depends on running in the right
thread, so the change looks right anyway.
Kevin
> block/io.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
> index aba67f66b9..ee7310fa13 100644
> --- a/block/io.c
> +++ b/block/io.c
> @@ -2895,8 +2895,9 @@ int bdrv_flush(BlockDriverState *bs)
> .ret = NOT_DONE,
> };
>
> - if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
> - /* Fast-path if already in coroutine context */
> + if (qemu_in_coroutine() &&
> + bdrv_get_aio_context(bs) == qemu_get_current_aio_context()) {
> + /* Fast-path if already in coroutine and we own the drive's context */
> bdrv_flush_co_entry(&flush_co);
> } else {
> co = qemu_coroutine_create(bdrv_flush_co_entry, &flush_co);
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-11 16:50 [RFC] bdrv_flush: only use fast path when in owned AioContext Stefan Reiter
2020-05-12 10:57 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2020-05-12 11:32 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-12 12:22 ` Stefan Reiter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200512105719.GI5951@linux.fritz.box \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=s.reiter@proxmox.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).