From: Jon Doron <arilou@gmail.com>
To: Roman Kagan <rvkagan@yandex-team.ru>,
"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
QEMU <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Evgeny Yakovlev <eyakovlev@virtuozzo.com>,
ehabkost@redhat.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] i386: Hyper-V VMBus ACPI DSDT entry
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:05:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512150511.GJ2862@jondnuc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512150123.GI2862@jondnuc>
On 12/05/2020, Jon Doron wrote:
>On 12/05/2020, Roman Kagan wrote:
>>On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 06:35:18AM +0300, Jon Doron wrote:
>>>On 08/04/2020, Roman Kagan wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 07:16:39AM +0300, Jon Doron wrote:
>>>> > Well I have implemented the hyperv synthetic kernel debugger interface, but
>>>> > on Windows 10 it requires to have a working VMBus (it's not really using it,
>>>> > but without a function vmbus that will answer to the initiate contact then
>>>> > the kdnet will simply be stuck in a loop.
>>
>>I tried to google for this interface but the only thing I managed to
>>find was this
>>
>>https://withinrafael.com/2015/02/01/how-to-set-up-synthetic-kernel-debugging-for-hyper-v-virtual-machines/
>>
>>Is this what you're trying to implement? Are there any more
>>authoritative descriptions of the feature?
>>
>>The document doesn't quite explain the inner workings of the feature,
>>but it looks like the regular network debugging interface, except that
>>IP is forwarded by the hypervisor app, so that the debugger has to
>>connect to the host and avoid setting up full-fledged network
>>connectivity to the guest. That would be essentially hv-net + slirp.
>>OTOH you say it doesn't use VMBus so I'm confused...
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Roman.
>>
>>>> > In addition to that Michael Kelley from Microsoft has informed us that
>>>> > Microsoft might be dropped the synthetic kernel debugger interface sometime
>>>> > in the future, and it seems like the new mode is simply to use hvnet device
>>>> > for the communication (which is again much faster).
>
>Yes that's indeed the interface I have implemented this part of the
>patch it not full ready for commit, but I think we can keep going with
>the VMBUS.
>
>Based on your previous reply it sounds like there is not a real issue
>with the current patch of ACPI DSDT entry, right?
>
>Thanks,
>-- Jon.
I suggest referring to the KVM patches I have already submitted that
Paolo said will probably get in soon.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11507663/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-03 14:23 [PATCH v1 0/5] hyperv: VMBus implementation Jon Doron
2020-04-03 14:23 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] hyperv: expose API to determine if synic is enabled Jon Doron
2020-04-03 14:23 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] hyperv: SControl is optional to enable SynIc Jon Doron
2020-04-03 14:23 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] vmbus: add vmbus protocol definitions Jon Doron
2020-04-03 14:23 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] vmbus: vmbus implementation Jon Doron
2020-04-03 14:23 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] i386: Hyper-V VMBus ACPI DSDT entry Jon Doron
2020-04-03 14:56 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2020-04-03 15:06 ` Jon Doron
2020-04-03 15:30 ` Jon Doron
2020-04-03 15:50 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2020-04-03 17:18 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2020-04-03 21:00 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2020-04-06 7:32 ` Roman Kagan
2020-04-06 8:20 ` Jon Doron
2020-04-07 18:56 ` Roman Kagan
2020-04-07 19:03 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2020-04-08 4:16 ` Jon Doron
2020-04-08 20:47 ` Roman Kagan
2020-04-09 3:35 ` Jon Doron
2020-05-12 14:05 ` Roman Kagan
2020-05-12 15:01 ` Jon Doron
2020-05-12 15:05 ` Jon Doron [this message]
2020-04-08 20:26 ` Roman Kagan
2020-04-08 21:42 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2020-04-06 10:14 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-04-03 22:48 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] hyperv: VMBus implementation no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200512150511.GJ2862@jondnuc \
--to=arilou@gmail.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=eyakovlev@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rvkagan@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).