From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Cc: Zhengxiao.zx@Alibaba-inc.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
yi.l.liu@intel.com, cjia@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
eskultet@redhat.com, ziye.yang@intel.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
cohuck@redhat.com, shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com,
dgilbert@redhat.com, zhi.a.wang@intel.com, mlevitsk@redhat.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, eauger@redhat.com,
felipe@nutanix.com, jonathan.davies@nutanix.com,
yan.y.zhao@intel.com, changpeng.liu@intel.com, Ken.Xue@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Kernel v20 6/8] vfio iommu: Update UNMAP_DMA ioctl to get dirty bitmap before unmap
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 21:27:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200514212706.036a336a@x1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589488667-9683-7-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com>
On Fri, 15 May 2020 02:07:45 +0530
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> wrote:
> DMA mapped pages, including those pinned by mdev vendor drivers, might
> get unpinned and unmapped while migration is active and device is still
> running. For example, in pre-copy phase while guest driver could access
> those pages, host device or vendor driver can dirty these mapped pages.
> Such pages should be marked dirty so as to maintain memory consistency
> for a user making use of dirty page tracking.
>
> To get bitmap during unmap, user should allocate memory for bitmap, set
> it all zeros, set size of allocated memory, set page size to be
> considered for bitmap and set flag VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 10 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index b76d3b14abfd..a1dc57bcece5 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -195,11 +195,15 @@ static void vfio_unlink_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *old)
> static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc(struct vfio_dma *dma, size_t pgsize)
> {
> uint64_t npages = dma->size / pgsize;
> + size_t bitmap_size;
>
> if (npages > DIRTY_BITMAP_PAGES_MAX)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - dma->bitmap = kvzalloc(DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages), GFP_KERNEL);
> + /* Allocate extra 64 bits which are used for bitmap manipulation */
> + bitmap_size = DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages) + sizeof(u64);
> +
> + dma->bitmap = kvzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!dma->bitmap)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -999,23 +1003,25 @@ static int verify_bitmap_size(uint64_t npages, uint64_t bitmap_size)
> }
>
> static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> - struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap)
> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap,
> + struct vfio_bitmap *bitmap)
> {
> - uint64_t mask;
> struct vfio_dma *dma, *dma_last = NULL;
> - size_t unmapped = 0;
> + size_t unmapped = 0, pgsize;
> int ret = 0, retries = 0;
> + unsigned long pgshift;
>
> mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>
> - mask = ((uint64_t)1 << __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap)) - 1;
> + pgshift = __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap);
> + pgsize = (size_t)1 << pgshift;
>
> - if (unmap->iova & mask) {
> + if (unmap->iova & (pgsize - 1)) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> - if (!unmap->size || unmap->size & mask) {
> + if (!unmap->size || unmap->size & (pgsize - 1)) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto unlock;
> }
> @@ -1026,9 +1032,15 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> - WARN_ON(mask & PAGE_MASK);
> -again:
> + /* When dirty tracking is enabled, allow only min supported pgsize */
> + if ((unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
> + (!iommu->dirty_page_tracking || (bitmap->pgsize != pgsize))) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
>
> + WARN_ON((pgsize - 1) & PAGE_MASK);
> +again:
> /*
> * vfio-iommu-type1 (v1) - User mappings were coalesced together to
> * avoid tracking individual mappings. This means that the granularity
> @@ -1066,6 +1078,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto unlock;
> }
> +
> dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova + unmap->size - 1, 0);
> if (dma && dma->iova + dma->size != unmap->iova + unmap->size) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -1083,6 +1096,23 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> if (dma->task->mm != current->mm)
> break;
>
> + if ((unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
> + (dma_last != dma)) {
> +
> + /*
> + * mark all pages dirty if all pages are pinned and
> + * mapped
> + */
> + if (dma->iommu_mapped)
> + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, 0,
> + dma->size >> pgshift);
Nit, all the callers of update_user_bitmap() precede the call with this
identical operation, we should probably push it into the function to do
it.
> +
> + ret = update_user_bitmap(bitmap->data, dma,
> + unmap->iova, pgsize);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> + }
> +
As noted last time, the above is just busy work if pfn_list is not
already empty. The entire code block above should be moved to after
the block below. Thanks,
Alex
> if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dma->pfn_list)) {
> struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap nb_unmap;
>
> @@ -2447,17 +2477,40 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>
> } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA) {
> struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap unmap;
> - long ret;
> + struct vfio_bitmap bitmap = { 0 };
> + int ret;
>
> minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap, size);
>
> if (copy_from_user(&unmap, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - if (unmap.argsz < minsz || unmap.flags)
> + if (unmap.argsz < minsz ||
> + unmap.flags & ~VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - ret = vfio_dma_do_unmap(iommu, &unmap);
> + if (unmap.flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) {
> + unsigned long pgshift;
> +
> + if (unmap.argsz < (minsz + sizeof(bitmap)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&bitmap,
> + (void __user *)(arg + minsz),
> + sizeof(bitmap)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (!access_ok((void __user *)bitmap.data, bitmap.size))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + pgshift = __ffs(bitmap.pgsize);
> + ret = verify_bitmap_size(unmap.size >> pgshift,
> + bitmap.size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = vfio_dma_do_unmap(iommu, &unmap, &bitmap);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 123de3bc2dce..0a0c7315ddd6 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -1048,12 +1048,22 @@ struct vfio_bitmap {
> * field. No guarantee is made to the user that arbitrary unmaps of iova
> * or size different from those used in the original mapping call will
> * succeed.
> + * VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP should be set to get dirty bitmap
> + * before unmapping IO virtual addresses. When this flag is set, user must
> + * provide data[] as structure vfio_bitmap. User must allocate memory to get
> + * bitmap, zero the bitmap memory and must set size of allocated memory in
> + * vfio_bitmap.size field. A bit in bitmap represents one page of user provided
> + * page size in 'pgsize', consecutively starting from iova offset. Bit set
> + * indicates page at that offset from iova is dirty. Bitmap of pages in the
> + * range of unmapped size is returned in vfio_bitmap.data
> */
> struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap {
> __u32 argsz;
> __u32 flags;
> +#define VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP (1 << 0)
> __u64 iova; /* IO virtual address */
> __u64 size; /* Size of mapping (bytes) */
> + __u8 data[];
> };
>
> #define VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 14)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-15 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-14 20:37 [PATCH Kernel v20 0/8] Add UAPIs to support migration for VFIO devices Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14 20:37 ` [PATCH Kernel v20 1/8] vfio: UAPI for migration interface for device state Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14 20:37 ` [PATCH Kernel v20 2/8] vfio iommu: Remove atomicity of ref_count of pinned pages Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14 20:37 ` [PATCH Kernel v20 3/8] vfio iommu: Cache pgsize_bitmap in struct vfio_iommu Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14 20:37 ` [PATCH Kernel v20 4/8] vfio iommu: Add ioctl definition for dirty pages tracking Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-15 10:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-15 17:35 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-19 15:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-19 15:53 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-19 16:00 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-14 20:37 ` [PATCH Kernel v20 5/8] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl " Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-15 3:27 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-15 6:14 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-15 10:05 ` Yan Zhao
2020-05-15 11:14 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-15 15:15 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-15 15:33 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14 20:37 ` [PATCH Kernel v20 6/8] vfio iommu: Update UNMAP_DMA ioctl to get dirty bitmap before unmap Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-15 3:27 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2020-05-15 4:16 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-15 5:47 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-15 6:47 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-15 13:31 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-15 15:30 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-15 15:48 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-14 20:37 ` [PATCH Kernel v20 7/8] vfio iommu: Add migration capability to report supported features Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14 20:37 ` [PATCH Kernel v20 8/8] vfio: Selective dirty page tracking if IOMMU backed device pins pages Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-15 3:32 ` [PATCH Kernel v20 0/8] Add UAPIs to support migration for VFIO devices Alex Williamson
2020-05-15 10:14 ` Yan Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200514212706.036a336a@x1.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=Ken.Xue@amd.com \
--cc=Zhengxiao.zx@Alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eauger@redhat.com \
--cc=eskultet@redhat.com \
--cc=felipe@nutanix.com \
--cc=jonathan.davies@nutanix.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
--cc=ziye.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).