qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: proposal: deprecate -readconfig/-writeconfig
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 11:06:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200515090647.hpeok5f57cf2oos5@sirius.home.kraxel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56379563-c1f3-3270-f9ac-5bdd49b324aa@redhat.com>

  Hi,

> Sometimes I feel like a broken and impartial solution is really worse
> than having none. If we don't truly support the read/write config
> options, we shouldn't pretend that we do.
> 
> Funneling users back to using the CLI is likely the better thing, even
> with no replacement.
> 
> I realize this is a pretty hostile thing to do in general, though, but
> it might truly be the kinder option to start simplifying and unifying
> configuration, documentation, and support efforts.
> 
> We don't have to actually remove it right away, either.

Removing doesn't buy us much as long as both cli and -readconfig are
using QemuOpts as backend.  -readconfig itself isn't that much code
after all, it is just an alternative way to feed QemuOpts.

I see -readconfig getting into the way when moving from QemuOpts to
something else (with proper tree support) though.

> We can just start sounding the alarms that we're preparing to remove
> it, and falling back to using the CLI would be a safe thing to do for
> now.

Yes, we should start sounding the alarms (aka deprecate it).  Not sure
"fallback to cli" is a good recommendation though, I suspect that might
not stay compatible either.

take care,
  Gerd



      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-15  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-14  8:09 proposal: deprecate -readconfig/-writeconfig Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-14  8:54 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-05-15  5:31   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-14  8:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-05-14 12:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-15  5:54     ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-15 10:19       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-14 14:40   ` John Snow
2020-05-14 15:34     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-05-14 15:51       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-14 15:55         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-05-15  5:44           ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-15  5:51       ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-15  9:06     ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200515090647.hpeok5f57cf2oos5@sirius.home.kraxel.org \
    --to=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).