From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>,
mst@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, svens@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, mihajlov@linux.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 15:47:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200519154739.0cd48192.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d72f56c0-fed0-12ea-dfa6-f3441952a30e@linux.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4911 bytes --]
On Mon, 18 May 2020 10:55:24 +0200
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 5/16/20 12:20 AM, Collin Walling wrote:
> > As more features and facilities are added to the Read SCP Info (RSCPI)
> > response, more space is required to store them. The space used to store
> > these new features intrudes on the space originally used to store CPU
> > entries. This means as more features and facilities are added to the
> > RSCPI response, less space can be used to store CPU entries.
> >
> > With the Extended-Length SCCB (ELS) facility, a KVM guest can execute
> > the RSCPI command and determine if the SCCB is large enough to store a
> > complete reponse. If it is not large enough, then the required length
> > will be set in the SCCB header.
> >
> > The caller of the SCLP command is responsible for creating a
> > large-enough SCCB to store a complete response. Proper checking should
> > be in place, and the caller should execute the command once-more with
> > the large-enough SCCB.
> >
> > This facility also enables an extended SCCB for the Read CPU Info
> > (RCPUI) command.
> >
> > When this facility is enabled, the boundary violation response cannot
> > be a result from the RSCPI, RSCPI Forced, or RCPUI commands.
> >
> > In order to tolerate kernels that do not yet have full support for this
> > feature, a "fixed" offset to the start of the CPU Entries within the
> > Read SCP Info struct is set to allow for the original 248 max entries
> > when this feature is disabled.
> >
> > Additionally, this is introduced as a CPU feature to protect the guest
> > from migrating to a machine that does not support storing an extended
> > SCCB. This could otherwise hinder the VM from being able to read all
> > available CPU entries after migration (such as during re-ipl).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > hw/s390x/sclp.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 1 +
> > target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h | 1 +
> > target/s390x/gen-features.c | 1 +
> > target/s390x/kvm.c | 4 ++++
> > 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> > index 755f5f3fab..bde4c5420e 100644
> > --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> > +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> > @@ -56,6 +56,18 @@ static bool sccb_has_valid_boundary(uint64_t sccb_addr, uint32_t code,
> > uint64_t allowed_len = (sccb_addr & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE;
> >
> > switch (code & SCLP_CMD_CODE_MASK) {
> > + case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO:
> > + case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED:
> > + case SCLP_CMDW_READ_CPU_INFO:
> > + /*
> > + * An extended-length SCCB is only allowed for RSCPI and RSCPU and is
Nit: I had to stare at this for a bit before I figured out what the
acronyms refer to.
> > + * allowed to exceed the 4k boundary. The respective commands will
> > + * set the length field to the required length if an insufficient
> > + * SCCB length is provided.
> > + */
> > + if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB)) {
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > default:
> > if (current_len <= allowed_len) {
> > return true;
(...)
> > diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> > index 8ddeebc544..6857f657fb 100644
> > --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> > +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> > @@ -522,6 +522,7 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN12_GA1[] = {
> > S390_FEAT_AP_QUEUE_INTERRUPT_CONTROL,
> > S390_FEAT_AP_FACILITIES_TEST,
> > S390_FEAT_AP,
> > + S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB,
> > };
> >
> > static uint16_t full_GEN12_GA2[] = {
> > diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> > index 69881a0da0..380fb81822 100644
> > --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> > +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> > @@ -2456,6 +2456,10 @@ void kvm_s390_get_host_cpu_model(S390CPUModel *model, Error **errp)
> > KVM_S390_VM_CRYPTO_ENABLE_APIE)) {
> > set_bit(S390_FEAT_AP, model->features);
> > }
> > +
> > + /* Extended-Length SCCB is handled entirely within QEMU */
> > + set_bit(S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, model->features);
> > +
>
> We need to fence this for secure guests as the SIDA is only 4k at the
> moment.
>
> Do we need to take extra steps for migration safety?
> I guess this is only available with host-passthrough or -model?
What do you mean with '-model'? I think it can be added manually
everywhere? But I'm always a bit confused by cpu models.
>
> > /* strip of features that are not part of the maximum model */
> > bitmap_and(model->features, model->features, model->def->full_feat,
> > S390_FEAT_MAX);
> >
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-15 22:20 [PATCH v2 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] s390/sclp: get machine once during read scp/cpu info Collin Walling
2020-05-18 8:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-18 17:30 ` Collin Walling
2020-06-11 11:33 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] s390/sclp: check sccb len before filling in data Collin Walling
2020-05-18 8:37 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-18 11:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-18 14:32 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-18 15:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-18 17:31 ` Collin Walling
2020-06-11 12:01 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-15 15:47 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary and length checks Collin Walling
2020-05-18 8:50 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-18 15:15 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-19 13:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-25 10:53 ` Janosch Frank
2020-06-11 12:56 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-15 15:47 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on sccb length Collin Walling
2020-06-11 13:05 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] s390/sclp: use cpu offset to locate cpu entries Collin Walling
2020-06-11 14:33 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest Collin Walling
2020-05-18 8:55 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-18 14:31 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-25 10:50 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-26 14:38 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-19 13:47 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] s390/kvm: header sync for diag318 Collin Walling
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-05-20 11:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-21 6:18 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-16 6:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 no-reply
2020-05-18 17:34 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-18 17:51 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200519154739.0cd48192.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).