From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Cc: "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
"Roman Kagan" <rvkagan@yandex-team.ru>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] block: consolidate blocksize properties consistency checks
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 17:52:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200520155221.GF5192@linux.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP+75-U0SsdBeK-6gzjrjeBN099FnM15_qU6JZ2Fy6H8aNA1uA@mail.gmail.com>
Am 20.05.2020 um 10:59 hat Philippe Mathieu-Daudé geschrieben:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:57 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Roman,
> >
> > On 5/20/20 10:06 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > > Several block device properties related to blocksize configuration must
> > > be in certain relationship WRT each other: physical block must be no
> > > smaller than logical block; min_io_size, opt_io_size, and
> > > discard_granularity must be a multiple of a logical block.
> > >
> > > To ensure these requirements are met, add corresponding consistency
> > > checks to blkconf_blocksizes, adjusting its signature to communicate
> > > possible error to the caller. Also remove the now redundant consistency
> > > checks from the specific devices.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <rvkagan@yandex-team.ru>
> > > ---
> > > v4: new patch
> > >
> > > include/hw/block/block.h | 2 +-
> > > hw/block/block.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > hw/block/fdc.c | 5 ++++-
> > > hw/block/nvme.c | 5 ++++-
> > > hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 7 +------
> > > hw/ide/qdev.c | 5 ++++-
> > > hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c | 10 +++-------
> > > hw/usb/dev-storage.c | 5 ++++-
> > > tests/qemu-iotests/172.out | 2 +-
> > > 9 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/block/block.h b/include/hw/block/block.h
> > > index d7246f3862..784953a237 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/block/block.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/block/block.h
> > > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ bool blk_check_size_and_read_all(BlockBackend *blk, void *buf, hwaddr size,
> > > bool blkconf_geometry(BlockConf *conf, int *trans,
> > > unsigned cyls_max, unsigned heads_max, unsigned secs_max,
> > > Error **errp);
> > > -void blkconf_blocksizes(BlockConf *conf);
> > > +bool blkconf_blocksizes(BlockConf *conf, Error **errp);
>
> Maybe rename blkconf_validate_blocksizes()?
It does more than validating. It also assigns defaults or guesses
settings from the host file.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-20 8:06 [PATCH v4 0/3] block: make BlockConf.*_size properties 32-bit Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 8:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] virtio-blk: store opt_io_size with correct size Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 8:48 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-20 10:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-05-20 21:11 ` Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 15:36 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-20 20:34 ` Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 8:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] block: consolidate blocksize properties consistency checks Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 8:57 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-20 8:59 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-20 15:52 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2020-05-20 15:50 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-20 21:31 ` Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 8:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] block: make BlockConf.*_size properties 32-bit Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 9:04 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-20 21:45 ` Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 15:54 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-20 21:50 ` Roman Kagan
2020-05-25 15:20 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200520155221.GF5192@linux.fritz.box \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rvkagan@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).