qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Klaus Jensen" <k.jensen@samsung.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	"Javier Gonzalez" <javier.gonz@samsung.com>,
	"Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/20] hw/block/nvme: fix pin-based interrupt behavior
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 08:45:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526144509.GA7809@C02WT3WMHTD6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200514044611.734782-8-its@irrelevant.dk>

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 06:45:58AM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> 
> First, since the device only supports MSI-X or pin-based interrupt, if
> MSI-X is not enabled, it should not accept interrupt vectors different
> from 0 when creating completion queues.
> 
> Secondly, the irq_status NvmeCtrl member is meant to be compared to the
> INTMS register, so it should only be 32 bits wide. And it is really only
> useful when used with multi-message MSI.
> 
> Third, since we do not force a 1-to-1 correspondence between cqid and
> interrupt vector, the irq_status register should not have bits set
> according to cqid, but according to the associated interrupt vector.
> 
> Fix these issues, but keep irq_status available so we can easily support
> multi-message MSI down the line.

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-14  4:45 [PATCH v6 00/20] nvme: small fixes, refactoring and cleanups Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:45 ` [PATCH v6 01/20] hw/block/nvme: fix pci doorbell size calculation Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:45 ` [PATCH v6 02/20] hw/block/nvme: rename trace events to pci_nvme Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:45 ` [PATCH v6 03/20] hw/block/nvme: remove superfluous breaks Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:45 ` [PATCH v6 04/20] hw/block/nvme: move device parameters to separate struct Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:45 ` [PATCH v6 05/20] hw/block/nvme: use constants in identify Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:45 ` [PATCH v6 06/20] hw/block/nvme: refactor nvme_addr_read Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:45 ` [PATCH v6 07/20] hw/block/nvme: fix pin-based interrupt behavior Klaus Jensen
2020-05-18  5:02   ` Klaus Jensen
2020-05-25  8:20     ` Klaus Jensen
2020-05-26 14:45   ` Keith Busch [this message]
2020-05-14  4:45 ` [PATCH v6 08/20] hw/block/nvme: allow use of any valid msix vector Klaus Jensen
2020-05-28 15:44   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-02 16:06     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-14  4:46 ` [PATCH v6 09/20] hw/block/nvme: add max_ioqpairs device parameter Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:46 ` [PATCH v6 10/20] hw/block/nvme: remove redundant cmbloc/cmbsz members Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:46 ` [PATCH v6 11/20] hw/block/nvme: factor out property/constraint checks Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:46 ` [PATCH v6 12/20] hw/block/nvme: factor out device state setup Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:46 ` [PATCH v6 13/20] hw/block/nvme: factor out block backend setup Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:46 ` [PATCH v6 14/20] hw/block/nvme: add namespace helpers Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:46 ` [PATCH v6 15/20] hw/block/nvme: factor out namespace setup Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:46 ` [PATCH v6 16/20] hw/block/nvme: factor out pci setup Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:46 ` [PATCH v6 17/20] hw/block/nvme: factor out cmb setup Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  4:46 ` [PATCH v6 18/20] hw/block/nvme: factor out pmr setup Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  7:59   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-14  4:46 ` [PATCH v6 19/20] hw/block/nvme: do cmb/pmr init as part of pci init Klaus Jensen
2020-05-14  8:04   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-14  4:46 ` [PATCH v6 20/20] hw/block/nvme: factor out controller identify setup Klaus Jensen
2020-06-02 15:31 ` [PATCH v6 00/20] nvme: small fixes, refactoring and cleanups Kevin Wolf
2020-06-07 12:51   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-06-07 13:08     ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200526144509.GA7809@C02WT3WMHTD6 \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
    --cc=javier.gonz@samsung.com \
    --cc=k.jensen@samsung.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).