From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] virtio-ccw: auto-manage VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM if PV
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 12:53:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200608125207-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200606013217.2cffa3ed.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 01:32:17AM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2020 12:23:24 -0400
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:11:55AM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > > The virtio specification tells that the device is to present
> > > VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM (a.k.a. VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM) when the
> > > device "can only access certain memory addresses with said access
> > > specified and/or granted by the platform". This is the case for a
> > > protected VMs, as the device can access only memory addresses that are
> > > in pages that are currently shared (only the guest can share/unsare its
> > > pages).
> > >
> > > No VM, however, starts out as a protected VM, but some VMs may be
> > > converted to protected VMs if the guest decides so.
> > >
> > > Making the end user explicitly manage the VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM via
> > > the property iommu_on is a minor disaster. Since the correctness of the
> > > paravirtualized virtio devices depends (and thus in a sense the
> > > correctness of the hypervisor) it, then the hypervisor should have the
> > > last word about whether VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM is to be presented or
> > > not.
> >
> > So, how about this: switch iommu to on/off/auto. Add a property with a
> > reasonable name "allow protected"? If set allow switch to protected
> > memory and also set iommu auto to on by default. If not set then don't.
> >
> > This will come handy for other things like migrating to hosts without
> > protected memory support.
> >
> >
> > Also, virtio now calls this PLATFORM_ACCESS, maybe we should rename
> > the property (keeping old one around for compat)?
> > I feel this will address lots of complaints ...
> >
>
> I'm not sure I've entirely understood your proposal, but I tried to
> do something in that direction.
>
> Short summary of the changes:
> * added new property "access_platform" as on/off/auto (default auto)
> * added alias "iommu_platform" for compatibility
> * rewrote this patch to on/off/auto so that we only do the override when
> user specified auto
>
> Let me list some pros and cons (compared to the previous patch):
>
> PRO:
> * Thanks to on/off/auto we don't override what the user specified. From
> user interface perspective preferable. I usually hate software that
> thinks its than me and can do the opposite I tell it.
>
> CON:
> * It is more code: "4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)"
> against "3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)"
> * Unlike the previous one, this one is not fool-proof! The user can
> still specify access_platform=off to lets say a hotplug device, and
> bring down the guest. We could however fence such stuff with an error
> message. Would be even more code though.
> * As far as I can tell 'auto' was used to pick a value on initialization
> time. This is a novel, and possibly dodgy use in a sense that the value
> of the property may change during the lifetime of the VM.
> * We may need to do something about libvirt.
>
> Further improvements are possible and probably necessary if we want
> to go down this path. But I would like to verify that first.
I think it should be even simpler. If switching to protected
VM is *allowed* by host then auto should mean on.
No changes of features across reset necessary.
> ----------------------------8<---------------------------------
> From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:48:21 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH v2.5 1/1] virtio-ccw: auto-manage VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM if PV
>
> The virtio specification tells that the device is to present
> VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM (a.k.a. VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM) when the
> device "can only access certain memory addresses with said access
> specified and/or granted by the platform". This is the case for a
> protected VMs, as the device can access only memory addresses that are
> in pages that are currently shared (only the guest can share/unsare its
> pages).
>
> No VM, however, starts out as a protected VM, but some VMs may be
> converted to protected VMs if the guest decides so.
>
> Making the end user explicitly manage the VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM via
> the property iommu_on is a minor disaster. Since the correctness of the
> paravirtualized virtio devices depends (and thus in a sense the
> correctness of the hypervisor) it, then the hypervisor should have the
> last word about whether VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM is to be presented or
> not.
>
> Currently presenting a PV guest with a (paravirtualized) virtio-ccw
> device has catastrophic consequences for the VM (after the hypervisors
> access to protected memory). This is especially grave in case of device
> hotplug (because in this case the guest is more likely to be in the
> middle of something important).
>
> Let us add the ability to manage the VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM virtio
> feature automatically. This is accomplished by turning the property
> into an 'on/off/auto' property, and for virtio-ccw devices if auto
> was specified forcing its value before we start the protected VM. If
> the VM should cease to be protected, the original value is restored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 2 ++
> hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> hw/virtio/virtio.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index f660070d22..705e6b153a 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ static void s390_machine_unprotect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
> migrate_del_blocker(pv_mig_blocker);
> error_free_or_abort(&pv_mig_blocker);
> qemu_balloon_inhibit(false);
> + subsystem_reset();
> }
>
> static int s390_machine_protect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
> @@ -382,6 +383,7 @@ static int s390_machine_protect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
> if (rc) {
> goto out_err;
> }
> + subsystem_reset();
> return rc;
>
> out_err:
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
> index 64f928fc7d..2bb29b57aa 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -874,6 +874,20 @@ static void virtio_ccw_reset(DeviceState *d)
> VirtioCcwDevice *dev = VIRTIO_CCW_DEVICE(d);
> VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&dev->bus);
> VirtIOCCWDeviceClass *vdc = VIRTIO_CCW_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(dev);
> + S390CcwMachineState *ms = S390_CCW_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> +
> + /*
> + * An attempt to use a paravirt device without VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM
> + * in PV, has catastrophic consequences for the VM. Let's force
> + * VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM not already specified.
> + */
> + if (vdev->access_platform_auto && ms->pv) {
> + virtio_add_feature(&vdev->host_features, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
> + vdev->access_platform = ON_OFF_AUTO_ON;
> + } else if (vdev->access_platform_auto) {
> + virtio_clear_feature(&vdev->host_features, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
> + vdev->access_platform = ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF;
> + }
>
> virtio_ccw_reset_virtio(dev, vdev);
> if (vdc->parent_reset) {
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index b6c8ef5bc0..f6bd271f14 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -3232,7 +3232,11 @@ void virtio_instance_init_common(Object *proxy_obj, void *data,
>
> object_initialize_child(proxy_obj, "virtio-backend", vdev, vdev_size,
> vdev_name, &error_abort, NULL);
> + object_property_add_alias(OBJECT(vdev), "iommu_platform",
> + OBJECT(vdev), "access_platform", &error_abort);
> qdev_alias_all_properties(vdev, proxy_obj);
> + object_property_add_alias(proxy_obj, "iommu_platform",
> + OBJECT(vdev), "access_platform", &error_abort);
> }
>
> void virtio_init(VirtIODevice *vdev, const char *name,
> @@ -3626,6 +3630,19 @@ static void virtio_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> return;
> }
>
> + switch (vdev->access_platform) {
> + case ON_OFF_AUTO_ON:
> + virtio_add_feature(&vdev->host_features, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
> + break;
> + case ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO:
> + /* transport code can mange access_platform */
> + vdev->access_platform_auto = true;
> + break;
> + case ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF: /*fall through*/
> + default:
> + vdev->access_platform_auto = false;
> + }
> +
> vdev->listener.commit = virtio_memory_listener_commit;
> memory_listener_register(&vdev->listener, vdev->dma_as);
> }
> @@ -3681,6 +3698,8 @@ static Property virtio_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_VIRTIO_COMMON_FEATURES(VirtIODevice, host_features),
> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("use-started", VirtIODevice, use_started, true),
> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("use-disabled-flag", VirtIODevice, use_disabled_flag, true),
> + DEFINE_PROP_ON_OFF_AUTO("access_platform", VirtIODevice, access_platform,
> + ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO),
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> index b69d517496..b77e1545b4 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ struct VirtIODevice
> uint8_t device_endian;
> bool use_guest_notifier_mask;
> AddressSpace *dma_as;
> + OnOffAuto access_platform;
> + bool access_platform_auto;
> QLIST_HEAD(, VirtQueue) *vector_queues;
> };
>
> @@ -289,8 +291,6 @@ typedef struct VirtIORNGConf VirtIORNGConf;
> VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY, true), \
> DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("any_layout", _state, _field, \
> VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT, true), \
> - DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("iommu_platform", _state, _field, \
> - VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, false), \
> DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("packed", _state, _field, \
> VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED, false)
>
>
> base-commit: 0ffd3d64bd1bb8b84950e52159a0062fdab34628
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-08 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-14 22:11 [PATCH v2 1/1] virtio-ccw: auto-manage VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM if PV Halil Pasic
2020-05-20 12:16 ` Halil Pasic
2020-05-20 16:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-05-22 21:04 ` Halil Pasic
2020-05-28 11:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-28 14:42 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-28 18:49 ` Halil Pasic
2020-05-28 17:52 ` Halil Pasic
2020-06-05 23:32 ` Halil Pasic
2020-06-08 16:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-08 17:00 ` Halil Pasic
2020-06-09 6:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-09 9:41 ` Halil Pasic
2020-06-09 14:02 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-09 15:47 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-06-09 16:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-09 16:41 ` Halil Pasic
2020-06-10 13:34 ` Halil Pasic
2020-06-09 16:28 ` Halil Pasic
2020-06-09 16:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-10 4:31 ` David Gibson
2020-06-10 7:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-10 10:07 ` David Gibson
2020-06-10 10:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-10 13:00 ` Halil Pasic
2020-06-10 13:19 ` Viktor Mihajlovski
2020-06-10 14:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-19 0:36 ` David Gibson
2020-06-19 0:33 ` David Gibson
2020-06-10 13:15 ` Halil Pasic
2020-06-10 4:29 ` David Gibson
2020-06-10 13:57 ` Halil Pasic
2020-06-19 0:59 ` David Gibson
2020-06-09 16:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-10 4:25 ` David Gibson
2020-06-10 21:37 ` Halil Pasic
2020-06-19 1:01 ` David Gibson
2020-06-08 16:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200608125207-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fiuczy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).