From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw/386: Fix uninitialized memory with -device and CPU hotplug
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:59:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200616125901.772229a6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159164753015.20543.7987300339811704895.stgit@naples-babu.amd.com>
On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 15:18:50 -0500
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com> wrote:
> Noticed the following command failure while testing CPU hotplug.
>
> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -machine q35,accel=kvm -smp 1,maxcpus=2,
> cores=1, threads=1,sockets=2 -cpu EPYC -device EPYC-x86_64-
> cpu,core-id=0,socket-id=1,thread-id=0
>
> qemu-system-x86_64: -device EPYC-x86_64-cpu,core-id=0,socket-id=1,
> thread-id=0: Invalid CPU [socket: 21855, die: 0, core: 0, thread: 0]
> with APIC ID 21855, valid index range 0:1
>
> This happens because APIC ID is calculated using uninitialized memory.
> This is happening after the addition of new field node_id in X86CPUTopoIDs
> structure. The node_id field is uninitialized while calling
> apicid_from_topo_ids. The problem is discussed in the thread below.
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200602171838.GG577771@habkost.net/
>
> Fix the problem by initializing the node_id properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/pc.c | 2 ++
> include/hw/i386/topology.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index 2128f3d6fe..974cc30891 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -1585,6 +1585,8 @@ static void pc_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> topo_ids.die_id = cpu->die_id;
> topo_ids.core_id = cpu->core_id;
> topo_ids.smt_id = cpu->thread_id;
> + topo_ids.node_id = cpu_x86_use_epyc_apic_id_encoding(ms->cpu_type) ?
> + x86_node_id_for_epyc(&topo_info, &topo_ids) : 0;
I'd rather not calculate some default value here,
this is the branch where we check user provided topology info and error out asking
to provide missing bits.
I also wonder if we should force user to specify numa nodes on CLI if EPYC cpu is used.
(i.e. I'm assuming that EPYC always requires numa)
> cpu->apic_id = x86ms->apicid_from_topo_ids(&topo_info, &topo_ids);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/topology.h b/include/hw/i386/topology.h
> index 07239f95f4..ee4deb84c4 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/topology.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/topology.h
> @@ -140,6 +140,17 @@ static inline unsigned apicid_pkg_offset_epyc(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info)
> apicid_node_width_epyc(topo_info);
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned x86_node_id_for_epyc(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info,
> + const X86CPUTopoIDs *topo_ids)
> +{
> + unsigned nr_nodes = MAX(topo_info->nodes_per_pkg, 1);
> + unsigned cores_per_node = DIV_ROUND_UP((topo_info->dies_per_pkg *
> + topo_info->cores_per_die *
> + topo_info->threads_per_core),
> + nr_nodes);
> +
> + return (topo_ids->core_id / cores_per_node) % nr_nodes;
what if nr_nodes == 0?
> +}
> /*
> * Make APIC ID for the CPU based on Pkg_ID, Core_ID, SMT_ID
> *
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-16 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-08 20:18 [PATCH 0/2] Fix couple of issues with AMD topology Babu Moger
2020-06-08 20:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw/386: Fix uninitialized memory with -device and CPU hotplug Babu Moger
2020-06-16 10:59 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2020-06-16 17:18 ` Babu Moger
2020-06-24 13:47 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-06-24 17:35 ` Babu Moger
2020-06-25 15:18 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-06-25 16:41 ` Babu Moger
2020-06-25 18:32 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-06-25 22:55 ` Babu Moger
2020-06-26 20:56 ` Babu Moger
2020-06-30 2:48 ` Babu Moger
2020-06-08 20:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] i386: Simplify CPUID_8000_001E for AMD Babu Moger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200616125901.772229a6@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).