From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:39:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200629173933.35cea40f.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200629104948-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:53:23 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:27:58PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > virtio-fs devices are only specified for virtio-1, so it is unclear
> > how a legacy or transitional device should behave.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Forcing off legacy now (after the virtio-fs device has already been
> > available) may have unintended consequences, therefore RFC.
> >
> > By default, a virtio-pci device uses 'AUTO' for disable_legacy, which
> > will resolve to different values based upon which bus the device has
> > been plugged. Therefore, forcing disable_legacy may result in the same
> > device or a quite different one.
> >
> > Even though pre-virtio-1 behaviour of virtio-fs devices is simply not
> > specified, toggling disable_legacy will have implications for the BAR
> > layout, IIRC, and therefore a guest might end up getting a different
> > device, even if it always used it with virtio-1 anyway.
> >
> > Not sure what the best way to solve this problem is. Adding a compat
> > property for disable_legacy=AUTO may be the right thing to do, but I'm
> > not quite clear if there are any further implications here.
>
> Well I notice that this device is not migrateable.
> So I think that we can just switch it over and be done with it.
Oh, that makes things easier. (I'm wondering if libvirt already
configures this correctly?)
>
>
> > Whatever we do here, we should make sure that the ccw incarnation of
> > this device indeed forces virtio-1.
>
> I agree. I notice that the API virtio_pci_force_virtio_1 turned out
> to be too fragile. I propose that instead we have a whitelist of
> devices which can be legacy or transitional. Force rest to modern.
Also, there are further complications because the mechanism is per
transport, and therefore easy to miss.
bool virtio_legacy_allowed(VirtIODevice *vdev)
{
switch (vdev->device_id) {
case <...>:
<list of legacy-capable devices>
return true;
default:
return false;
}
Seems straightforward enough.
>
>
> > ---
> > hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c
> > index e11c889d82b3..244205edf765 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c
> > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static void vhost_user_fs_pci_realize(VirtIOPCIProxy *vpci_dev, Error **errp)
> > vpci_dev->nvectors = dev->vdev.conf.num_request_queues + 2;
> > }
> >
> > + virtio_pci_force_virtio_1(vpci_dev);
> > qdev_realize(vdev, BUS(&vpci_dev->bus), errp);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-29 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-29 10:27 [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage Cornelia Huck
2020-06-29 14:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-29 15:39 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-06-29 15:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-30 9:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-30 10:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-30 11:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-30 13:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-01 13:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-02 10:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-29 17:05 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-06-30 12:10 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-30 12:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-30 13:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-01 16:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-02 10:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-02 10:45 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-02 11:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-02 11:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-02 13:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200629173933.35cea40f.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).