qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:25:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630142504.688aa989.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630121037.GC91444@stefanha-x1.localdomain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2372 bytes --]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:10:37 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:27:58PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > virtio-fs devices are only specified for virtio-1, so it is unclear
> > how a legacy or transitional device should behave.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > ---  
> 
> I thought that the following already forced VIRTIO 1.0 because it
> doesn't advertize Legacy or Transitional devices:
> 
>   static const VirtioPCIDeviceTypeInfo vhost_user_fs_pci_info = {
>       .base_name             = TYPE_VHOST_USER_FS_PCI,
>       .non_transitional_name = "vhost-user-fs-pci",
>       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>       .instance_size = sizeof(VHostUserFSPCI),
>       .instance_init = vhost_user_fs_pci_instance_init,
>       .class_init    = vhost_user_fs_pci_class_init,
>   };

This indeed makes vhost-user-fs-pci modern-only, I had not spotted that
when I wrote the patch. Other modern-only devices do not go down this
route and use the virtio_pci_force_virtio_1() approach.

> 
> Do you have a guest that sees this VIRTIO 1.0 device and still fails to
> negotiate the VERSION_1 feature bit?
> 
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c
> > index e11c889d82b3..244205edf765 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c
> > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static void vhost_user_fs_pci_realize(VirtIOPCIProxy *vpci_dev, Error **errp)
> >          vpci_dev->nvectors = dev->vdev.conf.num_request_queues + 2;
> >      }
> >  
> > +    virtio_pci_force_virtio_1(vpci_dev);  
> 
> Can this be moved to virtio_pci_types_register() so that it
> automatically happens for .non_transitional_name devices?

There are several existing modern-only devices that don't use that kind
of naming scheme...

What bothers me most is that you need to explicitly request a device to
be modern-only, while that should be the default for any newly added
device. Hence the approach with the centralized list of device types
mentioned in a parallel thread. The main problem with that is that the
proxy device starts getting realized before the virtio device with its
id is present... I failed to find a solution so far. But I'd really
like an approach that can work for all transports.

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-30 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-29 10:27 [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage Cornelia Huck
2020-06-29 14:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-29 15:39   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-29 15:45     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-30  9:35       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-30 10:45         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-30 11:30           ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-30 13:02             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-01 13:58               ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-02 10:24                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-29 17:05   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-06-30 12:10 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-30 12:25   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-06-30 13:04     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-01 16:19       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-02 10:16         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-02 10:45           ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-02 11:22             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-02 11:55               ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-02 13:22                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200630142504.688aa989.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).