From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD8FC433E0 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A308420663 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="YL/Rrp70" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A308420663 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48888 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jqIAe-0004YH-SV for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:27:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jqI4G-0005m7-1b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:21:04 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:31877 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jqI4E-00087s-C6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:21:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1593530458; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yUmhadzYsbJoUsPNvSzXULsKvEgPV32pY2Dh+SsTOBs=; b=YL/Rrp70o6VwAgegTSjdxJtFfZQmcTRY5weZznk27S7XM1S22xQYd0Yv2l1mtephZZO/Mr 58T/ue6YTyMXgvXpaswccQUgnH/XxW2uAeGTFdHw2Z77PtVqQuErI+PsRvnmVx9kWB2nub vu8RIfX7uatNFhfkNL5sCUHgbvtEZMU= Received: from mail-qv1-f69.google.com (mail-qv1-f69.google.com [209.85.219.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-264-tfOaxwxuMpWY0jrC2DgSoA-1; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:20:56 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tfOaxwxuMpWY0jrC2DgSoA-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 59so14130377qvb.4 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:20:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=yUmhadzYsbJoUsPNvSzXULsKvEgPV32pY2Dh+SsTOBs=; b=ekVlex57BqbF74YXzbTpR5uYPIS5SIOHaGARh7FgFKh+KZTN3WkGloyyA/Mt3E0K1F 4HtgDL4bqNMjpPv2iPrgbPFGmIm3LXdZsKvkDqilhhGxtxefFP1FggxlX4qMJsyly6Ma 7q1E4+uLPd3EX8Y3edOXRnJXX67THiQ7XBFY/egDKYz1gy0YBUF+Dt2b/6btGqumoHi4 pmr1tJpn0w2Yhn7lIk4THsTkMpstYca2EKRr8Vp6XrXDeWkFlWUQfGfr6XSMJFh0UGZU dOhG6W82mxojzbVxINIhCE/hSw0ggjk/eUK3IIik5u+NtNQTDXjpv3lfCezN3RFdSbv+ LBqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530WT9OeyYkP2FE0hMO4ueMe95OzZDUpFb05V3l4l2mFWajpBG5L 1p8tGTIX1RseRIZjuLTFj3VcUwIfuNBB2qXnt6UQgd7b4IMSUaJAFXzxAQLKGcrt0wLnH1M2eBj xwbPGSVCDCm7EohM= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:691:: with SMTP id f17mr21071263qth.60.1593530455163; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:20:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyaSyRApaOEKtSry3MwsgGncS6tKjbi/UUHjyaY0u983MTzn5zOMB9Ndi7N57O0ZmipW+5A6g== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:691:: with SMTP id f17mr21071097qth.60.1593530453188; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xz-x1 ([2607:9880:19c0:32::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t48sm3530585qtb.50.2020.06.30.08.20.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:20:50 -0400 From: Peter Xu To: Jason Wang Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/1] memory: Delete assertion in memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier Message-ID: <20200630152050.GC3138@xz-x1> References: <20200626064122.9252-2-eperezma@redhat.com> <20200626212917.GD175520@xz-x1> <8cf25190-53e6-8cbb-372b-e3d4ec714dc5@redhat.com> <20200628144746.GA239443@xz-x1> <54d2cdfd-97b8-9e1d-a607-d7a5e96be3a1@redhat.com> <20200629133403.GA266532@xz-x1> <2589d0e9-cc5b-a4df-8790-189b49f1a40e@redhat.com> <1b4eaaaf-c2ab-0da8-afb4-1b7b4221e6cf@redhat.com> <20200630052148-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <49f547e1-dd87-7abe-1075-9dcece75b641@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49f547e1-dd87-7abe-1075-9dcece75b641@redhat.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=peterx@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.61; envelope-from=peterx@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/30 01:11:03 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Yan Zhao , Juan Quintela , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eugenio =?utf-8?B?UMOpcmV6?= , Eric Auger , Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 05:23:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > Ok, we had a dedicated mr for interrupt: > > > > > > memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(MEMORY_REGION(&vtd_dev_as->iommu), > > > VTD_INTERRUPT_ADDR_FIRST, > > > &vtd_dev_as->iommu_ir, 1); > > > > > > So it should be fine. I guess the reason that I'm asking is that I thought > > > "IR" means "Interrupt remapping" but in fact it means "Interrupt Region"? I was meaning "interrupt remapping", and of course it's the interrupt region too when IR enabled... > > > > > > But I'm still not clear about the invalidation part for interrupt region, > > > maybe you can elaborate a little more on this. > > > > > > Btw, I think guest can trigger the assert in vtd_do_iommu_translate() if we > > > teach vhost to DMA to that region: > > > > Why would we want to? > > > I meant a buggy(malicious) guest driver. Yes seems possible. Do you want to post a patch? Let me know if you want me to... Thanks, -- Peter Xu