From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D8DC433DF for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 15:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6292620885 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 15:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="WlEvnjRA" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6292620885 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54122 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jr1Py-0005ND-N2 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 11:46:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48292) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jr1PK-0004wb-JP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 11:45:50 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:50455 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jr1PH-0003IX-3a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 11:45:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1593704745; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KERfCJPX8Xpwv3CIVOz74GuJ/tFpQ+OLN608kByojBE=; b=WlEvnjRAUTlF3ouoPwMWXWD3TjsjcRZ/O7QU2yJvQ9daaHxLSveZEtiJ1q/9dy+I7vKwOY p0/GD5T04pWVRJj9+wAORFTRD1HcNfH7p3UuR7DM/eDjWBc3pjc/NdDmOrgjHnNogV9vmz HzYLjAc2LoVObId3rjHnd3v6PHlxly0= Received: from mail-qt1-f198.google.com (mail-qt1-f198.google.com [209.85.160.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-426-3k7YBLgyODmtRBtwYQhKEQ-1; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 11:45:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 3k7YBLgyODmtRBtwYQhKEQ-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f198.google.com with SMTP id 71so11586216qte.5 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 08:45:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=KERfCJPX8Xpwv3CIVOz74GuJ/tFpQ+OLN608kByojBE=; b=KSNBYMQwF/EdEOrHdQ7gI94/QlzGtuFldMR4sMI+C+TN64wc5IrtZ0ZMKwkUh4xriB DjdYd7rtdEARbktdvwUach6Qpf1+7jpQ5jkWLu1o6q8IC6GLuiZmy7z8jda60ed3AUSH aPK0TUfh+Vj+l//7jZ+PsJcztqqQsvYyzY+3XoQ6QfZZrv+zc/fEC0a4cTL0HTfNa3Ff zRNGuzZVmXy2scL7UGmjR2JV3Dk924kHGHMlFVPCJ/Yi0lDli+VWSk7nySytiuiIk1vC wjIzv7utE70Q7s4kLNRQMK1bKSV/b7zxt6mJg7PmK9ja2xCfJn1x8RdXSC4BoSFPEqPq SYaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315Tk02uu2UsoMh2vl+xYvh4xkPBpPlFvUej2Dc6r8FV10x9Adw YQkJSS7LYgdp7ZqvprHd1/5C7Cs0VRsMHHFznqSc9NNPPocJXle3yfA10GfD9bj8qfkjehzsk4A esU6WBAkbGsMUDn4= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a758:: with SMTP id q85mr29468723qke.301.1593704743076; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 08:45:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwf5gu7UwG4Dlhr41vbJtpDIYlNchQpcmzvymWPNUsWyZoRszin42Oqzkpe09NR10OFZUu4Bw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:a758:: with SMTP id q85mr29468699qke.301.1593704742784; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 08:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xz-x1 ([2607:9880:19c0:32::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d53sm6807257qtc.47.2020.07.02.08.45.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 02 Jul 2020 08:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:45:40 -0400 From: Peter Xu To: Jason Wang Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/1] memory: Delete assertion in memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier Message-ID: <20200702154540.GI40675@xz-x1> References: <20200626064122.9252-2-eperezma@redhat.com> <20200626212917.GD175520@xz-x1> <8cf25190-53e6-8cbb-372b-e3d4ec714dc5@redhat.com> <20200628144746.GA239443@xz-x1> <54d2cdfd-97b8-9e1d-a607-d7a5e96be3a1@redhat.com> <20200629133403.GA266532@xz-x1> <2589d0e9-cc5b-a4df-8790-189b49f1a40e@redhat.com> <20200630153911.GD3138@xz-x1> <69f6d6e7-a0b1-abae-894e-4e81b7e0cc90@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=peterx@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.61; envelope-from=peterx@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/02 03:42:59 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Yan Zhao , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "libvir-list@redhat.com" , Juan Quintela , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eugenio =?utf-8?B?UMOpcmV6?= , Eric Auger , Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:01:54AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > So I think we agree that a new notifier is needed? Good to me, or a new flag should be easier (IOMMU_NOTIFIER_DEV_IOTLB)? -- Peter Xu