From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F3AC433E0 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BF4D207FF for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="O4LeHXjm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1BF4D207FF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:51128 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrOgO-0003tb-9b for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:37:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrOPG-0006CX-TV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:19:18 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:37086 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrOPF-0004eM-0K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:19:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1593793154; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9Fk6SyDxzNjz+9czjM2xdv/qjRhkmMBD8VMWbMN7ABM=; b=O4LeHXjmNOMWlvlrNGScZFkWFFnWV9as5OlxEG18+3jxzOgF/Rq1tFy2wQLzS/fplFiJcb 5TxfGOjGjfyKrdhRx+5gP6//aGd2whRY7FmBys3OhaVmSRGGLvUZgxgkTKC3dOP/MAGzlf DYVZV8WWJu1RMAP6YXSCNiwrYKVOCI0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-245-Ja4w9KHuNFOxnaUtH1znPw-1; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:19:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Ja4w9KHuNFOxnaUtH1znPw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5501100CCC0 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.36.110.57]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFFF119697; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:18:58 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Cover the firmware JSON schema Message-ID: <20200703161858.GO2213227@redhat.com> References: <20200703161453.8406-1-philmd@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200703161453.8406-1-philmd@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.3 (2020-06-14) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.81; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/03 01:34:15 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Kashyap Chamarthy , Laszlo Ersek , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 06:14:53PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Add an entry to cover firmware.json (see commit 3a0adfc9bf: > schema that describes the different uses and properties of > virtual machine firmware). > Cc the libvirt maintainers if it ever changes. > > Cc: Laszlo Ersek > Cc: Daniel P. Berrange > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann > Cc: Kashyap Chamarthy > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin > Suggested-by: Laszlo Ersek > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > --- > Based on a comment from Laszlo: > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg604925.html > > I don't think Laszlo should be the sole maintainer, not sure > who else should be listed. Gerd and Kashyap? :) > Can we add it 'maintained' without specific maintainer? > --- > MAINTAINERS | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index dec252f38b..57c90201df 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -2601,6 +2601,12 @@ F: include/hw/i2c/smbus_master.h > F: include/hw/i2c/smbus_slave.h > F: include/hw/i2c/smbus_eeprom.h > > +Firmware schema specifications > +M: Laszlo Ersek > +R: libvir-list@redhat.com FWIW, I don't think libvirt needs to review this. Our firmware handling code doesn't really care what specific files exist - it just follows the declared logic to pick amongst whatever exists. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|