[PULL 29/31] block/vhdx: drop unallocated_blocks_are_zero

[Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>]

From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

vhdx doesn't have .bdrv_co_block_status handler, so DATA|ALLOCATED is
always assumed for it in bdrv_co_block_status().
unallocated_blocks_are_zero is useless (it doesn't affect the only user
of the field: bdrv_co_block_status()), drop it.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200528094405.145708-9-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
---
 block/vhdx.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/vhdx.c b/block/vhdx.c
index fa9e544a5e..645dc4b4f4 100644
--- a/block/vhdx.c
+++ b/block/vhdx.c
@@ -1164,9 +1164,6 @@ static int vhdx_get_info(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverInfo *bdi)
 
     bdi->cluster_size = s->block_size;
 
-    bdi->unallocated_blocks_are_zero =
-        (s->params.data_bits & VHDX_PARAMS_HAS_PARENT) == 0;
-
     return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.26.2