From: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@au1.ibm.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH for-5.1] xhci: fix valid.max_access_size to access address registers
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:33:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200721083322.90651-1-lvivier@redhat.com> (raw)
QEMU XHCI advertises AC64 (64-bit addressing) but doesn't allow
64-bit mode access in "runtime" and "operational" MemoryRegionOps.
Set the max_access_size based on sizeof(dma_addr_t) as AC64 is set.
XHCI specs:
"If the xHC supports 64-bit addressing (AC64 = ‘1’), then software
should write 64-bit registers using only Qword accesses. If a
system is incapable of issuing Qword accesses, then writes to the
64-bit address fields shall be performed using 2 Dword accesses;
low Dword-first, high-Dword second. If the xHC supports 32-bit
addressing (AC64 = ‘0’), then the high Dword of registers containing
64-bit address fields are unused and software should write addresses
using only Dword accesses"
The problem has been detected with SLOF, as linux kernel always accesses
registers using 32-bit access even if AC64 is set and revealed by
5d971f9e6725 ("memory: Revert "memory: accept mismatching sizes in memory_region_access_valid"")
Suggested-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
---
hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c b/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c
index b330e36fe6cc..67a18fe2b64c 100644
--- a/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c
+++ b/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c
@@ -3184,7 +3184,7 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps xhci_oper_ops = {
.read = xhci_oper_read,
.write = xhci_oper_write,
.valid.min_access_size = 4,
- .valid.max_access_size = 4,
+ .valid.max_access_size = sizeof(dma_addr_t),
.endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
};
@@ -3200,7 +3200,7 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps xhci_runtime_ops = {
.read = xhci_runtime_read,
.write = xhci_runtime_write,
.valid.min_access_size = 4,
- .valid.max_access_size = 4,
+ .valid.max_access_size = sizeof(dma_addr_t),
.endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
};
--
2.26.2
next reply other threads:[~2020-07-21 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-21 8:33 Laurent Vivier [this message]
2020-07-21 9:17 ` [PATCH for-5.1] xhci: fix valid.max_access_size to access address registers Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-21 10:25 ` Laurent Vivier
2020-07-21 14:01 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200721083322.90651-1-lvivier@redhat.com \
--to=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=aik@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).