qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	svens@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, mihajlov@linux.ibm.com,
	rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary and length checks
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:26:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200723082626.5f2bda1b.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4e80383-b244-e47b-8980-8b35fb6a7468@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:40:14 -0400
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 7/21/20 4:41 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:

> > The options I would support are
> > 
> > 1. "sccb_boundary_is_valid" which returns "true" if valid
> > 2. "sccb_boundary_is_invalid" which returns "true" if invalid
> > 3. "sccb_boundary_validate" which returns "0" if valid and -EINVAL if not.
> > 
> > Which makes reading this code a bit easier.
> >   

Of these, I like option 1 best.

> 
> Sounds good. I'll takes this into consideration for the next round. (I
> may wait just a little longer for that to allow more reviews to come in
> from whoever has the time, if that's okay.)

We have to wait for (a) QEMU to do a release and (b) the Linux changes
to merge upstream anyway, so we're not in a hurry :)

As said before, it already looked good from my side, but the suggested
changes are fine with me as well.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-23  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-24 20:23 [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-06-24 20:23 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] s390/sclp: get machine once during read scp/cpu info Collin Walling
2020-06-24 20:23 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] s390/sclp: check sccb len before filling in data Collin Walling
2020-06-24 20:23 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary and length checks Collin Walling
2020-06-25  6:29   ` Thomas Huth
2020-07-20  8:17   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-20 20:06     ` Collin Walling
2020-07-21  8:41       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-21 18:40         ` Collin Walling
2020-07-23  6:26           ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-07-24 15:06             ` Collin Walling
2020-06-24 20:23 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on sccb length Collin Walling
2020-07-20  8:19   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-20 20:06     ` Collin Walling
2020-06-24 20:23 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] s390/sclp: use cpu offset to locate cpu entries Collin Walling
2020-06-24 20:23 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest Collin Walling
2020-06-26 10:01   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-15 15:35     ` Collin Walling
2020-07-15 16:05       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-24 20:23 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] s390/kvm: header sync for diag318 Collin Walling
2020-06-24 20:23 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-06-26 10:03   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-15 15:36 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-07-15 16:04   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-15 16:26     ` Collin Walling
2020-07-16 12:02       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-09  7:54         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-09-09  8:46           ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-09  9:43             ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-09 18:13               ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10  6:38                 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-10  6:49                   ` Collin Walling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200723082626.5f2bda1b.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).