From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390x/protvirt: allow to IPL secure execution guests with -no-reboot
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:05:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200723170515.4e2ee21e.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2d0d040-3fa9-df7b-eb05-8a5906212486@de.ibm.com>
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:29:29 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 21.07.20 14:25, Janosch Frank wrote:
> > On 7/21/20 12:32 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >> Right now -no-reboot does prevent secure execution guests from running.
> >
> > s/-no-reboot/--no-reboot/
>
> Actually qemu --help gives the parameters with just one "-"
>
>
> Not sure about secure vs protected. Whatever Conny prefers.
The doc seems to talk about "protected virtualization", "protected
mode", and "secure guests". What about (slight rewording):
"s390x/protvirt: allow to IPL secure guests with -no-reboot
Right now, -no-reboot prevents secure guests from running. This is
correct from an implementation point of view, as we have modeled the
transition from non-secure to secure as a program directed IPL. From a
user perspective, this is not the behavior of least surprise.
We should implement the IPL into protected mode similar to the functions
that we use for kdump/kexec. In other words, we do not stop here when
-no-reboot is specified on the command line. Like function 0 or function
1, function 10 is not a classic reboot. For example, it can only be called
once. Before calling it a second time, a real reboot/reset must happen
in-between. So function code 10 is more or less a state transition
reset, but not a "standard" reset or reboot."
I think this is still appropriate for hard freeze.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-23 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-21 10:32 [PATCH 1/1] s390x/protvirt: allow to IPL secure execution guests with -no-reboot Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-21 10:49 ` Viktor Mihajlovski
2020-07-21 10:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-21 12:25 ` Janosch Frank
2020-07-21 12:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-23 15:05 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-07-23 15:52 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-23 17:15 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200723170515.4e2ee21e.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).