From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: use QOM macros for declaration/definition of secret types
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:12:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724091245.GC3146350@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200723185006.GR1274972@habkost.net>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:50:06PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 07:14:09PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > This introduces the use of the OBJECT_DEFINE and OBJECT_DECLARE macro
> > families in the secret types, in order to eliminate boilerplate code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > crypto/secret.c | 24 ++++--------------------
> > crypto/secret_common.c | 32 +++++++++-----------------------
> > crypto/secret_keyring.c | 28 +++++++++-------------------
> > include/crypto/secret.h | 11 ++---------
> > include/crypto/secret_common.h | 13 ++-----------
> > include/crypto/secret_keyring.h | 18 ++----------------
> > 6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Beautiful.
>
> I wonder how hard it would be to automate this. I'm assuming
> Coccinelle won't be able to deal with the macro definitions, but
> a handwritten conversion script would be really useful for
> dealing with our 1226 static TypeInfo structs.
Probably possible to do a reasonably good job with a perl script or
similar. The code patterns to be replaced are reasonably easy to
identify with a few regexes.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-24 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-23 18:14 [PATCH 0/4] qom: reduce boilerplate required for declaring and defining objects Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-23 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] qom: make object_ref/unref use a void * instead of Object * Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-23 19:04 ` Eric Blake
2020-07-24 9:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-23 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] qom: provide convenient macros for declaring and defining types Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-23 19:23 ` Eric Blake
2020-07-24 9:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-09 4:21 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-08-11 18:22 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-07-23 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] crypto: use QOM macros for declaration/definition of secret types Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-23 18:50 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-07-24 9:12 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2020-08-06 18:01 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-08-07 11:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-08 1:38 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-07-23 19:25 ` Eric Blake
2020-07-23 18:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] crypto: use QOM macros for declaration/definition of TLS creds types Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-23 19:26 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200724091245.GC3146350@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).